“当我看到它时,我就知道它”代码质量的感知:ITiCSE '17工作组报告

J. Börstler, H. Störrle, Daniel Toll, Jelle van Assema, Rodrigo Duran, Sara Hooshangi, J. Jeuring, H. Keuning, Carsten Kleiner, Bonnie K. MacKellar
{"title":"“当我看到它时,我就知道它”代码质量的感知:ITiCSE '17工作组报告","authors":"J. Börstler, H. Störrle, Daniel Toll, Jelle van Assema, Rodrigo Duran, Sara Hooshangi, J. Jeuring, H. Keuning, Carsten Kleiner, Bonnie K. MacKellar","doi":"10.1145/3174781.3174785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context. Code quality is a key issue in software development. The ability to develop high quality software is therefore a key learning goal of computing programs. However, there are no universally accepted measures to assess the quality of code and current standards are considered weak. Furthermore, there are many facets to code quality. Defining and explaining the concept of code quality is therefore a challenge faced by many educators. Objectives. In this working group, we investigated code quality as perceived by students, educators, and professional developers, in particular, the differences in their views of code quality and which quality aspects they consider as more or less important. Furthermore, we investigated their sources for information about code quality and its assessment. Methods. We interviewed 34 students, educators and professional developers regarding their perceptions of code quality. For the interviews they brought along code from their own experience to discuss and exemplify code quality. Results. There was no common definition of code quality among or within these groups. Quality was mostly described in terms of indicators that could measure an aspect of code quality. Among these indicators, readability was named most frequently by all groups. The groups showed significant differences in the sources they use for learning about code quality with education ranked lowest in all groups. Conclusions. Code quality should be discussed more thoroughly in educational programs.","PeriodicalId":254043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 ITiCSE Conference on Working Group Reports","volume":"14 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"I know it when I see it\\\" Perceptions of Code Quality: ITiCSE '17 Working Group Report\",\"authors\":\"J. Börstler, H. Störrle, Daniel Toll, Jelle van Assema, Rodrigo Duran, Sara Hooshangi, J. Jeuring, H. Keuning, Carsten Kleiner, Bonnie K. MacKellar\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3174781.3174785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context. Code quality is a key issue in software development. The ability to develop high quality software is therefore a key learning goal of computing programs. However, there are no universally accepted measures to assess the quality of code and current standards are considered weak. Furthermore, there are many facets to code quality. Defining and explaining the concept of code quality is therefore a challenge faced by many educators. Objectives. In this working group, we investigated code quality as perceived by students, educators, and professional developers, in particular, the differences in their views of code quality and which quality aspects they consider as more or less important. Furthermore, we investigated their sources for information about code quality and its assessment. Methods. We interviewed 34 students, educators and professional developers regarding their perceptions of code quality. For the interviews they brought along code from their own experience to discuss and exemplify code quality. Results. There was no common definition of code quality among or within these groups. Quality was mostly described in terms of indicators that could measure an aspect of code quality. Among these indicators, readability was named most frequently by all groups. The groups showed significant differences in the sources they use for learning about code quality with education ranked lowest in all groups. Conclusions. Code quality should be discussed more thoroughly in educational programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2017 ITiCSE Conference on Working Group Reports\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2017 ITiCSE Conference on Working Group Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3174781.3174785\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 ITiCSE Conference on Working Group Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3174781.3174785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

上下文。代码质量是软件开发中的一个关键问题。因此,开发高质量软件的能力是计算机程序的一个关键学习目标。然而,没有普遍接受的方法来评估代码的质量,而且目前的标准被认为是薄弱的。此外,代码质量有许多方面。因此,定义和解释代码质量的概念是许多教育者面临的一个挑战。目标。在这个工作组中,我们调查了学生、教育工作者和专业开发人员对代码质量的看法,特别是他们对代码质量的看法的差异,以及他们认为哪些质量方面更重要或更不重要。此外,我们调查了他们关于代码质量及其评估的信息来源。方法。我们采访了34名学生、教育工作者和专业开发人员,了解他们对代码质量的看法。在面试中,他们从自己的经验中带来了代码来讨论和举例代码质量。结果。在这些组之间或组内没有代码质量的共同定义。质量主要是根据能够度量代码质量的某个方面的指标来描述的。在这些指标中,易读性被所有群体提到的频率最高。这些小组在他们用来学习代码质量的资源上表现出了显著的差异,教育程度在所有小组中排名最低。结论。应该在教育项目中更彻底地讨论代码质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"I know it when I see it" Perceptions of Code Quality: ITiCSE '17 Working Group Report
Context. Code quality is a key issue in software development. The ability to develop high quality software is therefore a key learning goal of computing programs. However, there are no universally accepted measures to assess the quality of code and current standards are considered weak. Furthermore, there are many facets to code quality. Defining and explaining the concept of code quality is therefore a challenge faced by many educators. Objectives. In this working group, we investigated code quality as perceived by students, educators, and professional developers, in particular, the differences in their views of code quality and which quality aspects they consider as more or less important. Furthermore, we investigated their sources for information about code quality and its assessment. Methods. We interviewed 34 students, educators and professional developers regarding their perceptions of code quality. For the interviews they brought along code from their own experience to discuss and exemplify code quality. Results. There was no common definition of code quality among or within these groups. Quality was mostly described in terms of indicators that could measure an aspect of code quality. Among these indicators, readability was named most frequently by all groups. The groups showed significant differences in the sources they use for learning about code quality with education ranked lowest in all groups. Conclusions. Code quality should be discussed more thoroughly in educational programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信