Debby Alita, RB Ali Shodiqin
{"title":"Sentimen Analisis Vaksin Covid-19 Menggunakan Naive Bayes Dan Support Vector Machine","authors":"Debby Alita, RB Ali Shodiqin","doi":"10.58602/jaiti.v1i1.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vaccine administration in Indonesia has now reached the booster vaccine stage, various types of vaccines have been given to the Indonesian people from the Sinovac, AstraZeneca, Sinopharm, Moderna, Pfizer vaccines, etc. Not a few Indonesian people use several types of vaccines that are offered up to booster vaccines, but there are some people who think they are still infected with this Covid virus with severe symptoms. Another opinion is that there is also a vaccine. In 2019, people were shocked by a new virus from Wuhan, China, namely the corona virus or called COVID-19 (Corona Virus Disease 2019). The government invites the public to get the Covid-19 vaccine in order to form herd immunity or group immunity to the Covid-19 virus. Sentiment analysis can be used to evaluate a service performance and so on. So the author will conduct a comparison between the Naive Bayer Classifier method and the Support Vector Machine to find out which method is more efficient in knowing people's accurate views of the Covid-19 vaccine. The performance test results of the two methods show that the performance of the Naive Bayes Classifier method (Accuracy 72.88%, Precision 43.49%, Recall 54.95%, and average performance 57.10%) is higher than the average performance of the Support Vector Machine method (Accuracy 77.00% , Precision 75.00%, Recall 7.70%, and average performance 53.52%). Based on the average performance value of the Naive Bayes Classifier method, it can be considered more efficient than the Support Vector Machine method.","PeriodicalId":408393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology Information (JAITI)","volume":"76 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology Information (JAITI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58602/jaiti.v1i1.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印尼的疫苗管理目前已经进入了加强疫苗阶段,印尼人民已经接种了各种类型的疫苗,包括科兴、阿斯利康、国药、现代、辉瑞等疫苗。不少印度尼西亚人使用了几种加强疫苗,但也有一些人认为他们仍然感染了这种症状严重的新冠病毒。另一种观点是,也有疫苗。2019年,人们被来自中国武汉的一种新病毒震惊了,即冠状病毒或称为COVID-19(冠状病毒病2019)。政府邀请公众接种新冠病毒疫苗,以形成对新冠病毒的群体免疫或群体免疫。情感分析可以用来评估服务性能等等。因此,笔者将对朴素拜耳分类器方法和支持向量机方法进行比较,找出哪种方法在了解人们对Covid-19疫苗的准确看法方面更有效。两种方法的性能测试结果表明,朴素贝叶斯分类器方法的性能(准确率72.88%,精密度43.49%,召回率54.95%,平均性能57.10%)高于支持向量机方法的平均性能(准确率77.00%,精密度75.00%,召回率7.70%,平均性能53.52%)。基于朴素贝叶斯分类器方法的平均性能值,可以认为它比支持向量机方法更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sentimen Analisis Vaksin Covid-19 Menggunakan Naive Bayes Dan Support Vector Machine
Vaccine administration in Indonesia has now reached the booster vaccine stage, various types of vaccines have been given to the Indonesian people from the Sinovac, AstraZeneca, Sinopharm, Moderna, Pfizer vaccines, etc. Not a few Indonesian people use several types of vaccines that are offered up to booster vaccines, but there are some people who think they are still infected with this Covid virus with severe symptoms. Another opinion is that there is also a vaccine. In 2019, people were shocked by a new virus from Wuhan, China, namely the corona virus or called COVID-19 (Corona Virus Disease 2019). The government invites the public to get the Covid-19 vaccine in order to form herd immunity or group immunity to the Covid-19 virus. Sentiment analysis can be used to evaluate a service performance and so on. So the author will conduct a comparison between the Naive Bayer Classifier method and the Support Vector Machine to find out which method is more efficient in knowing people's accurate views of the Covid-19 vaccine. The performance test results of the two methods show that the performance of the Naive Bayes Classifier method (Accuracy 72.88%, Precision 43.49%, Recall 54.95%, and average performance 57.10%) is higher than the average performance of the Support Vector Machine method (Accuracy 77.00% , Precision 75.00%, Recall 7.70%, and average performance 53.52%). Based on the average performance value of the Naive Bayes Classifier method, it can be considered more efficient than the Support Vector Machine method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信