Burcu Erdemi̇r
{"title":"Akademisyenlerin Etik Dışı Davranışlarına Yönelik Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Görüşleri","authors":"Burcu Erdemi̇r","doi":"10.33712/mana.1247554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Global higher education systems worldwide and their stakeholders have substantially been affected by the transformative effects of neoliberal policies that challenged ethical practices through increasing competition, changing managerial understanding, diminishing academic freedom and meritocracy. Considering these effects, this research aims to investigate Turkish university students’ perceptions about unethical practices of faculty ranging from teaching and assessment to their service duties for students. In this qualitative study, 23 Turkish university students’ interview data were evaluated from The Cultural Dimensions Model of Hofstede. The overall impression was that students had high consciousness about academic codes of conduct. As to the major findings, while the top five frequently experienced unethical practices were “favoritism, professional incompetence, humiliation, autonomy vs. responsibility dilemma and verbal abuse”, only a few students defended their rights against unethical practices because they did not want to rock the boat or they had disbelief in positive change. The main implications are briefly: for academic leaders to form an anti-harassment office run by an independent body; for faculty to adopt a fair approach and be open to feedback; for students to reflect their concerns to faculty, report them to authorities when needed and develop their knowledge further about academic ethics.","PeriodicalId":112131,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi","volume":"55 15","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.1247554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新自由主义政策通过增加竞争、改变管理理解、减少学术自由和精英管理来挑战道德实践,从而极大地影响了全球高等教育体系及其利益相关者。考虑到这些影响,本研究旨在调查土耳其大学生对教师不道德行为的看法,从教学和评估到他们对学生的服务职责。本定性研究采用Hofstede的文化维度模型对23名土耳其大学生的访谈数据进行评估。总体印象是学生对学术行为准则的意识很高。调查发现,最常见的五种不道德行为是“偏袒、专业无能、羞辱、自主与责任困境和言语虐待”,只有少数学生捍卫自己的权利,反对不道德行为,因为他们不想破坏现状,或者他们不相信积极的变化。其主要含义如下:学术领袖应成立一个由独立机构管理的反骚扰办公室;教师应采取公平的方法并对反馈持开放态度;让学生向教师反映他们的担忧,在需要时向当局报告,并进一步发展他们对学术道德的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Akademisyenlerin Etik Dışı Davranışlarına Yönelik Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Görüşleri
Global higher education systems worldwide and their stakeholders have substantially been affected by the transformative effects of neoliberal policies that challenged ethical practices through increasing competition, changing managerial understanding, diminishing academic freedom and meritocracy. Considering these effects, this research aims to investigate Turkish university students’ perceptions about unethical practices of faculty ranging from teaching and assessment to their service duties for students. In this qualitative study, 23 Turkish university students’ interview data were evaluated from The Cultural Dimensions Model of Hofstede. The overall impression was that students had high consciousness about academic codes of conduct. As to the major findings, while the top five frequently experienced unethical practices were “favoritism, professional incompetence, humiliation, autonomy vs. responsibility dilemma and verbal abuse”, only a few students defended their rights against unethical practices because they did not want to rock the boat or they had disbelief in positive change. The main implications are briefly: for academic leaders to form an anti-harassment office run by an independent body; for faculty to adopt a fair approach and be open to feedback; for students to reflect their concerns to faculty, report them to authorities when needed and develop their knowledge further about academic ethics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信