政治法律规定心理学家和心理学科学家在与法医心理学相关的新闻媒体上的陈述的权威

U. Mustika
{"title":"政治法律规定心理学家和心理学科学家在与法医心理学相关的新闻媒体上的陈述的权威","authors":"U. Mustika","doi":"10.37303/magister.v10i2.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article wants to find the legal politics of authorizing forensic psychologists to make statements on client data in the media as stipulated in the Indonesian Code of Ethics of Psychology. Consistency between regulations in the code of ethics in formulating objectives and achieving regulatory objectives needs to be studied, as well as consistency between the content of the code of ethics regulations and the content of applicable laws and regulations in Indonesia. Forensic psychology is part of 18 sub-fields of psychology. Forensic Psychology services can be performed by a psychologist of one psychological scientist to assist law enforcement in legal proceedings inside and outside the court, research and educational needs. Based on the study of legal politics, it can be found that the legal regulations contained in the Code of Ethics are clearly intended to help law enforcement, researchers, and educators to understand phenomena, but the process and content of forensic psychologist statements on clients must always protect client privacy. Normatively, there are no inconsistencies in all regulations in the code of ethics, and all the contents of the code of ethics are in harmony with the laws and regulations governing education, research, law enforcement, and confidentiality of personal data. Thus, from the study of legal politics has been found consistency between goals, ways, and efforts so that it is clearly illustrated the politics of law granting authority, namely for the development of education and law enforcement without disturbing client privacy. \nKeywords: Legal Politics, Psychologist, Psychology Scientist, Mass Media, Forensic Psychology","PeriodicalId":441760,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif","volume":"42 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"POLITIK HUKUM PENGATURAN WEWENANG PSIKOLOG DAN ILMUWAN PSIKOLOGI DALAM PENYAMPAIAN PERNYATAAN MELALUI MEDIA MASSA TERKAIT DENGAN PSIKOLOGI FORENSIK\",\"authors\":\"U. Mustika\",\"doi\":\"10.37303/magister.v10i2.39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article wants to find the legal politics of authorizing forensic psychologists to make statements on client data in the media as stipulated in the Indonesian Code of Ethics of Psychology. Consistency between regulations in the code of ethics in formulating objectives and achieving regulatory objectives needs to be studied, as well as consistency between the content of the code of ethics regulations and the content of applicable laws and regulations in Indonesia. Forensic psychology is part of 18 sub-fields of psychology. Forensic Psychology services can be performed by a psychologist of one psychological scientist to assist law enforcement in legal proceedings inside and outside the court, research and educational needs. Based on the study of legal politics, it can be found that the legal regulations contained in the Code of Ethics are clearly intended to help law enforcement, researchers, and educators to understand phenomena, but the process and content of forensic psychologist statements on clients must always protect client privacy. Normatively, there are no inconsistencies in all regulations in the code of ethics, and all the contents of the code of ethics are in harmony with the laws and regulations governing education, research, law enforcement, and confidentiality of personal data. Thus, from the study of legal politics has been found consistency between goals, ways, and efforts so that it is clearly illustrated the politics of law granting authority, namely for the development of education and law enforcement without disturbing client privacy. \\nKeywords: Legal Politics, Psychologist, Psychology Scientist, Mass Media, Forensic Psychology\",\"PeriodicalId\":441760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37303/magister.v10i2.39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37303/magister.v10i2.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文希望找到印尼《心理学伦理守则》中规定的授权法医心理学家在媒体上对客户数据发表声明的法律政治。道德守则的规定之间在制定目标和实现监管目标方面的一致性需要研究,道德守则规定的内容与印度尼西亚适用法律法规的内容之间的一致性也需要研究。法医心理学是心理学18个子领域的一部分。法医心理学服务可由一名心理学家或一名心理科学家提供,以协助执法人员进行法庭内外的法律诉讼、研究和教育需要。通过对法律政治的研究可以发现,《道德规范》所包含的法律规定显然是为了帮助执法人员、研究人员和教育工作者理解现象,但法医心理学家对委托人陈述的过程和内容必须始终保护委托人的隐私。规范上,《道德守则》各项规定不存在不一致之处,《道德守则》各项内容与教育、科研、执法、个人资料保密等方面的法律法规保持一致。因此,从法律政治学的研究中发现了目标、方式和努力之间的一致性,从而清晰地阐明了法律赋予权力的政治,即在不侵犯当事人隐私的情况下发展教育和执法。关键词:法律政治,心理学家,心理学家,大众传媒,法医心理学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
POLITIK HUKUM PENGATURAN WEWENANG PSIKOLOG DAN ILMUWAN PSIKOLOGI DALAM PENYAMPAIAN PERNYATAAN MELALUI MEDIA MASSA TERKAIT DENGAN PSIKOLOGI FORENSIK
This article wants to find the legal politics of authorizing forensic psychologists to make statements on client data in the media as stipulated in the Indonesian Code of Ethics of Psychology. Consistency between regulations in the code of ethics in formulating objectives and achieving regulatory objectives needs to be studied, as well as consistency between the content of the code of ethics regulations and the content of applicable laws and regulations in Indonesia. Forensic psychology is part of 18 sub-fields of psychology. Forensic Psychology services can be performed by a psychologist of one psychological scientist to assist law enforcement in legal proceedings inside and outside the court, research and educational needs. Based on the study of legal politics, it can be found that the legal regulations contained in the Code of Ethics are clearly intended to help law enforcement, researchers, and educators to understand phenomena, but the process and content of forensic psychologist statements on clients must always protect client privacy. Normatively, there are no inconsistencies in all regulations in the code of ethics, and all the contents of the code of ethics are in harmony with the laws and regulations governing education, research, law enforcement, and confidentiality of personal data. Thus, from the study of legal politics has been found consistency between goals, ways, and efforts so that it is clearly illustrated the politics of law granting authority, namely for the development of education and law enforcement without disturbing client privacy. Keywords: Legal Politics, Psychologist, Psychology Scientist, Mass Media, Forensic Psychology
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信