溶解气体分析缺陷类型识别新方法的比较分析

O. Shutenko, O. Kulyk
{"title":"溶解气体分析缺陷类型识别新方法的比较分析","authors":"O. Shutenko, O. Kulyk","doi":"10.1109/KhPIWeek57572.2022.9916319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the authors' most recent methods of defect type recognition based on the results of dissolved gas analysis. The analysis of diagnostic criteria used by these methods for defect type recognition is performed. The results of comparative analysis of reliability of defect recognition of different types with the considered methods are given. It is found that recognition reliability for all analysed methods is approximately at the same level, but there are differences in recognition reliability of different methods in relation to defects of different types.","PeriodicalId":197096,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 3rd KhPI Week on Advanced Technology (KhPIWeek)","volume":"22 1-2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of New Methods for Defect Type Recognition by Dissolved Gas Analysis\",\"authors\":\"O. Shutenko, O. Kulyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/KhPIWeek57572.2022.9916319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with the authors' most recent methods of defect type recognition based on the results of dissolved gas analysis. The analysis of diagnostic criteria used by these methods for defect type recognition is performed. The results of comparative analysis of reliability of defect recognition of different types with the considered methods are given. It is found that recognition reliability for all analysed methods is approximately at the same level, but there are differences in recognition reliability of different methods in relation to defects of different types.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 3rd KhPI Week on Advanced Technology (KhPIWeek)\",\"volume\":\"22 1-2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 3rd KhPI Week on Advanced Technology (KhPIWeek)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/KhPIWeek57572.2022.9916319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 3rd KhPI Week on Advanced Technology (KhPIWeek)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/KhPIWeek57572.2022.9916319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文介绍了基于溶解气体分析结果的缺陷类型识别的最新方法。对这些方法用于缺陷类型识别的诊断标准进行了分析。给出了不同类型缺陷识别方法的可靠性对比分析结果。结果表明,各分析方法的识别信度基本处于同一水平,但对于不同类型的缺陷,不同方法的识别信度存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of New Methods for Defect Type Recognition by Dissolved Gas Analysis
The article deals with the authors' most recent methods of defect type recognition based on the results of dissolved gas analysis. The analysis of diagnostic criteria used by these methods for defect type recognition is performed. The results of comparative analysis of reliability of defect recognition of different types with the considered methods are given. It is found that recognition reliability for all analysed methods is approximately at the same level, but there are differences in recognition reliability of different methods in relation to defects of different types.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信