异胺酸与碘酸钠在胆囊造影中的比较。

Radiologia clinica Pub Date : 1977-01-01

B Golberg

{"title":"异胺酸与碘酸钠在胆囊造影中的比较。","authors":"B Golberg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cholecystography was carried out on 456 consecutive patients using varying dosage schedules of cholebrine (iocetamic acid) tablets and biloptin (sodium iopodate) tablets. The density of gall-bladder gave the impression of a slightly greater opacification with cholebrin tablets. Quality of common duct demonstration was equally good with both media, with those patients having a morning dose of contrast giving the best demonstration.","PeriodicalId":76405,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia clinica","volume":"46 1","pages":"42-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of iocetamic acid and sodium iopodate in cholecystography.\",\"authors\":\"B Golberg\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cholecystography was carried out on 456 consecutive patients using varying dosage schedules of cholebrine (iocetamic acid) tablets and biloptin (sodium iopodate) tablets. The density of gall-bladder gave the impression of a slightly greater opacification with cholebrin tablets. Quality of common duct demonstration was equally good with both media, with those patients having a morning dose of contrast giving the best demonstration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia clinica\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"42-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1977-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia clinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

对连续456例患者使用不同剂量计划的胆卤(醋胺酸)片和比洛匹丁(碘酸钠)片进行了胆囊造影。胆囊密度表现为胆蛋白片略大的混浊。两种造影剂的共管显像质量都很好，早晨造影剂的患者显像效果最好。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

A comparison of iocetamic acid and sodium iopodate in cholecystography.

Cholecystography was carried out on 456 consecutive patients using varying dosage schedules of cholebrine (iocetamic acid) tablets and biloptin (sodium iopodate) tablets. The density of gall-bladder gave the impression of a slightly greater opacification with cholebrin tablets. Quality of common duct demonstration was equally good with both media, with those patients having a morning dose of contrast giving the best demonstration.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Radiologia clinica

自引率

0.00%

发文量