{"title":"囊性脊柱裂的筛查。成本效益分析。","authors":"S Hagard, F Carter, R G Milne","doi":"10.1136/jech.30.1.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The costs and economic benefits are examined of introducing a programme for the mass-screening of pregnancies for the detection and abortion of fetuses with spina bifida cystica. A benefit-cost index is derived, and the possible effects on it of making different input assumptions are discussed. It is considered that, on economic grounds, screening may be worthwhile only in populations in which the incidence of spina bifida is high.</p>","PeriodicalId":75622,"journal":{"name":"British journal of preventive & social medicine","volume":"30 1","pages":"40-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jech.30.1.40","citationCount":"59","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening for spina bifida cystica. A cost-benefit analysis.\",\"authors\":\"S Hagard, F Carter, R G Milne\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jech.30.1.40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The costs and economic benefits are examined of introducing a programme for the mass-screening of pregnancies for the detection and abortion of fetuses with spina bifida cystica. A benefit-cost index is derived, and the possible effects on it of making different input assumptions are discussed. It is considered that, on economic grounds, screening may be worthwhile only in populations in which the incidence of spina bifida is high.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of preventive & social medicine\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"40-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1976-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jech.30.1.40\",\"citationCount\":\"59\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of preventive & social medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.30.1.40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of preventive & social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.30.1.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Screening for spina bifida cystica. A cost-benefit analysis.
The costs and economic benefits are examined of introducing a programme for the mass-screening of pregnancies for the detection and abortion of fetuses with spina bifida cystica. A benefit-cost index is derived, and the possible effects on it of making different input assumptions are discussed. It is considered that, on economic grounds, screening may be worthwhile only in populations in which the incidence of spina bifida is high.