20世纪酸碱理论与科学工作的反思性分析

Q4 Social Sciences
Felipe de Moura Souza , Eliana Maria Aricó
{"title":"20世纪酸碱理论与科学工作的反思性分析","authors":"Felipe de Moura Souza ,&nbsp;Eliana Maria Aricó","doi":"10.1016/j.eq.2017.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper presents a new reading on the construction of acid‐base theory in the twentieth century, more specifically the participation of S.A. Arrhenius, J.N. Bronsted, T.M. Lowry and G.N. Lewis. Along the historiographical review confronted naive views of the nature of science in order to achieve a better reflection on the scientist's role in science. The reading will provide a rethink about the importance of the history of chemistry in the classroom.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39011,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Quimica","volume":"28 4","pages":"Pages 211-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.eq.2017.07.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teorias ácido‐base no século XX e uma análise reflexiva do trabalho científico\",\"authors\":\"Felipe de Moura Souza ,&nbsp;Eliana Maria Aricó\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eq.2017.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The paper presents a new reading on the construction of acid‐base theory in the twentieth century, more specifically the participation of S.A. Arrhenius, J.N. Bronsted, T.M. Lowry and G.N. Lewis. Along the historiographical review confronted naive views of the nature of science in order to achieve a better reflection on the scientist's role in science. The reading will provide a rethink about the importance of the history of chemistry in the classroom.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educacion Quimica\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 211-216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.eq.2017.07.002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educacion Quimica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0187893X17300721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Quimica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0187893X17300721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对20世纪酸碱理论的构建提出了一个新的解读,更具体地说,是a.a Arrhenius, J.N. Bronsted, T.M. Lowry和G.N. Lewis的参与。沿着史学的回顾,面对科学本质的幼稚观点,以便更好地反映科学家在科学中的作用。阅读材料将提供一个重新思考化学历史在课堂上的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teorias ácido‐base no século XX e uma análise reflexiva do trabalho científico

The paper presents a new reading on the construction of acid‐base theory in the twentieth century, more specifically the participation of S.A. Arrhenius, J.N. Bronsted, T.M. Lowry and G.N. Lewis. Along the historiographical review confronted naive views of the nature of science in order to achieve a better reflection on the scientist's role in science. The reading will provide a rethink about the importance of the history of chemistry in the classroom.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educacion Quimica
Educacion Quimica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信