陶瓷厚度和钛阳极氧化对二硅酸锂陶瓷在钛合金表面美观效果的影响。

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
P Weeranoppanant, M Palanuwech
{"title":"陶瓷厚度和钛阳极氧化对二硅酸锂陶瓷在钛合金表面美观效果的影响。","authors":"P Weeranoppanant,&nbsp;M Palanuwech","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2397Weeranoppanant10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In order to investigate the esthetic outcomes via color differences of various lithium disilicate ceramic thicknesses on various voltages of anodized titanium.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>28 lithium disilicate ceramic specimens (medium translucency) were arranged into four groups based on the thickness of the ceramic: 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mm (n=7). Each group was tested with seven different materials (n=7): composite resin (A2-dentin shade, control), zirconia, titanium, 40 V (blue), 50 V (light yellow), 60 V (yellow) and 70 V (pink)-anodized titanium. All the specimens were measured with a spectrophotometer, and then compared with the composite resin (control) to establish the color differences. To be considered as clinically acceptable, the color differences must be lower than 2.7. The data obtained was statistically analyzed through ANOVA and a post hoc test (p=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the thickness of the lithium disilicate ceramics and the type of material had a significant effect on the color differences observed (p⟨0.05). When ceramics thickness more than 2.0 mm were used for zirconia or 2.5- mm ceramic thickness for yellow-shade (50 V and 60 V) of anodized titanium, the color differences obtained were below the clinical acceptability values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>yellowshade of anodized titanium tends to achieve esthetics in combination with adequate ceramic thickness.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Ceramic Thickness and Titanium Anodization on Esthetic Outcomes of Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Over Titanium Alloys.\",\"authors\":\"P Weeranoppanant,&nbsp;M Palanuwech\",\"doi\":\"10.1922/EJPRD_2397Weeranoppanant10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In order to investigate the esthetic outcomes via color differences of various lithium disilicate ceramic thicknesses on various voltages of anodized titanium.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>28 lithium disilicate ceramic specimens (medium translucency) were arranged into four groups based on the thickness of the ceramic: 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mm (n=7). Each group was tested with seven different materials (n=7): composite resin (A2-dentin shade, control), zirconia, titanium, 40 V (blue), 50 V (light yellow), 60 V (yellow) and 70 V (pink)-anodized titanium. All the specimens were measured with a spectrophotometer, and then compared with the composite resin (control) to establish the color differences. To be considered as clinically acceptable, the color differences must be lower than 2.7. The data obtained was statistically analyzed through ANOVA and a post hoc test (p=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the thickness of the lithium disilicate ceramics and the type of material had a significant effect on the color differences observed (p⟨0.05). When ceramics thickness more than 2.0 mm were used for zirconia or 2.5- mm ceramic thickness for yellow-shade (50 V and 60 V) of anodized titanium, the color differences obtained were below the clinical acceptability values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>yellowshade of anodized titanium tends to achieve esthetics in combination with adequate ceramic thickness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2397Weeranoppanant10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2397Weeranoppanant10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨不同厚度的二硅酸锂陶瓷在不同阳极氧化钛电压下的颜色差异对美容效果的影响。材料与方法:28个二硅酸锂(中等半透明)陶瓷试样按陶瓷厚度分为1.0、1.5、2.0、2.5 mm四组(n=7)。每组用7种不同的材料(n=7)进行测试:复合树脂(a2 -牙本质阴影,对照),氧化锆,钛,40 V(蓝色),50 V(浅黄色),60 V(黄色)和70 V(粉红色)-阳极氧化钛。用分光光度计测定样品的色差,并与复合树脂(对照)进行对比。色差必须小于2.7,才被认为是临床可接受的。所得资料采用方差分析和事后检验进行统计学分析(p=0.05)。结果:二硅酸锂陶瓷的厚度和材料类型对观察到的颜色差异有显著影响(p⟨0.05)。当被用于氧化锆陶瓷厚度超过2.0毫米或2.5毫米陶瓷厚度为yellow-shade (50 V和60 V)阳极氧化钛,颜色差异获得低于临床可接受性值。结论:阳极氧化钛的黄色调与适当的陶瓷厚度相结合,更容易达到美观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Ceramic Thickness and Titanium Anodization on Esthetic Outcomes of Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Over Titanium Alloys.

Objective: In order to investigate the esthetic outcomes via color differences of various lithium disilicate ceramic thicknesses on various voltages of anodized titanium.

Materials and methods: 28 lithium disilicate ceramic specimens (medium translucency) were arranged into four groups based on the thickness of the ceramic: 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mm (n=7). Each group was tested with seven different materials (n=7): composite resin (A2-dentin shade, control), zirconia, titanium, 40 V (blue), 50 V (light yellow), 60 V (yellow) and 70 V (pink)-anodized titanium. All the specimens were measured with a spectrophotometer, and then compared with the composite resin (control) to establish the color differences. To be considered as clinically acceptable, the color differences must be lower than 2.7. The data obtained was statistically analyzed through ANOVA and a post hoc test (p=0.05).

Results: Both the thickness of the lithium disilicate ceramics and the type of material had a significant effect on the color differences observed (p⟨0.05). When ceramics thickness more than 2.0 mm were used for zirconia or 2.5- mm ceramic thickness for yellow-shade (50 V and 60 V) of anodized titanium, the color differences obtained were below the clinical acceptability values.

Conclusions: yellowshade of anodized titanium tends to achieve esthetics in combination with adequate ceramic thickness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信