[跨学科和跨学科性作为一种规范性动力:政治学的挑战与机遇]。

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Antonia Graf, Bastian Loges, Sandra Schwindenhammer
{"title":"[跨学科和跨学科性作为一种规范性动力:政治学的挑战与机遇]。","authors":"Antonia Graf, Bastian Loges, Sandra Schwindenhammer","doi":"10.1007/s11615-023-00453-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inter- and transdisciplinarity (ITD) has been part of political science for quite some time now, but although political science regularly deals with its self-understanding, the consequences for research and researchers of ITD have not yet been systematically considered. To stimulate this debate, we conceptualize ITD as a spectrum of knowledge integration, application, and participation. We use International Relations norm research as a theoretical framework to describe, analyze, and reflect on ITD as a normative dynamic. Autoethnographically and through participatory observation, we examine ITD as a normative dynamic, with insights from three research projects in the field of sustainability. Specifically, we ask what implications ITD has for researchers and research in political science. As a result, we find that ITD offers both opportunities and challenges. In the context of knowledge integration, we discuss the importance of the participation of political science in major societal issues in contrast to ITD's preferences for a particular understanding of knowledge and research. We reflect on ITD's application bias in terms of problem-solving opportunities and output orientation. In addition, we consider the participation postulate of ITD and weigh potential democratizing effects against the conditions under which these might be realized. Finally, we address where further research seems useful to continue reflection on ITD.</p>","PeriodicalId":45529,"journal":{"name":"Politische Vierteljahresschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948790/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Inter- and Transdisciplinarity as a Normative Dynamic: Challenges and Opportunities for Political Science].\",\"authors\":\"Antonia Graf, Bastian Loges, Sandra Schwindenhammer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11615-023-00453-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Inter- and transdisciplinarity (ITD) has been part of political science for quite some time now, but although political science regularly deals with its self-understanding, the consequences for research and researchers of ITD have not yet been systematically considered. To stimulate this debate, we conceptualize ITD as a spectrum of knowledge integration, application, and participation. We use International Relations norm research as a theoretical framework to describe, analyze, and reflect on ITD as a normative dynamic. Autoethnographically and through participatory observation, we examine ITD as a normative dynamic, with insights from three research projects in the field of sustainability. Specifically, we ask what implications ITD has for researchers and research in political science. As a result, we find that ITD offers both opportunities and challenges. In the context of knowledge integration, we discuss the importance of the participation of political science in major societal issues in contrast to ITD's preferences for a particular understanding of knowledge and research. We reflect on ITD's application bias in terms of problem-solving opportunities and output orientation. In addition, we consider the participation postulate of ITD and weigh potential democratizing effects against the conditions under which these might be realized. Finally, we address where further research seems useful to continue reflection on ITD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politische Vierteljahresschrift\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948790/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politische Vierteljahresschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-023-00453-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politische Vierteljahresschrift","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-023-00453-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跨学科和跨学科性(ITD)成为政治学的一部分已有相当长的时间,但尽管政治学经常讨论其自我理解问题,却尚未系统地考虑 ITD 对研究和研究人员的影响。为了激发这场辩论,我们将 ITD 概念化为知识的整合、应用和参与。我们将国际关系规范研究作为一个理论框架来描述、分析和反思作为规范动态的 ITD。通过参与式观察,我们以自传体的方式,从可持续发展领域的三个研究项目中获得启示,将 ITD 作为一种规范性动态加以研究。具体而言,我们询问 ITD 对政治学研究人员和研究有何影响。结果,我们发现 ITD 既提供了机遇,也带来了挑战。在知识整合方面,我们讨论了政治学参与重大社会问题的重要性,这与 ITD 对知识和研究的特定理解形成了鲜明对比。我们从解决问题的机会和产出导向的角度反思了 ITD 的应用偏向。此外,我们还考虑了 ITD 的参与假设,并权衡了潜在的民主化效应与实现这些效应的条件。最后,我们探讨了进一步的研究对继续反思 ITD 有何益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Inter- and Transdisciplinarity as a Normative Dynamic: Challenges and Opportunities for Political Science].

Inter- and transdisciplinarity (ITD) has been part of political science for quite some time now, but although political science regularly deals with its self-understanding, the consequences for research and researchers of ITD have not yet been systematically considered. To stimulate this debate, we conceptualize ITD as a spectrum of knowledge integration, application, and participation. We use International Relations norm research as a theoretical framework to describe, analyze, and reflect on ITD as a normative dynamic. Autoethnographically and through participatory observation, we examine ITD as a normative dynamic, with insights from three research projects in the field of sustainability. Specifically, we ask what implications ITD has for researchers and research in political science. As a result, we find that ITD offers both opportunities and challenges. In the context of knowledge integration, we discuss the importance of the participation of political science in major societal issues in contrast to ITD's preferences for a particular understanding of knowledge and research. We reflect on ITD's application bias in terms of problem-solving opportunities and output orientation. In addition, we consider the participation postulate of ITD and weigh potential democratizing effects against the conditions under which these might be realized. Finally, we address where further research seems useful to continue reflection on ITD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politische Vierteljahresschrift
Politische Vierteljahresschrift POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: - Für die deutsche Version bitte nach unten scrollen - Politische Vierteljahresschrift (PVS) (“German Political Science Quarterly”, GPSQ) publishes the latest double-blind peer-reviewed research results from all sub-disciplines of political science. It thus includes original contributions from political theory and the history of ideas, from the analysis and comparison of political systems, from policy analysis, from the field of international relations and foreign policy, from empirical social research and methodology, from political sociology as well as political science pedagogy. The contributions published in PVS come from German or German-speaking political scientists as well as from international political scientists who refer to the German or German-speaking political science. Special Issues Special Issues provide opportunities to contribute to important thematic and/or theoretical developments in political science or its subfields. Regular Calls for Proposals are initiated by the Editors, but potential Guest Editors may also send offers for special issues at any time. Special issues include at least six contributions to be recruited by the Guest Editors, supplemented by an introduction. Most of these contributions are critical papers, but the integration of a literature review and/or one or two research notes is also possible. All contributions need to successfully pass the double-blind peer-review process before publication. The PVS is listed in the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). ______ Die Politische Vierteljahresschrift (PVS) – German Political Science Quarterly bietet Raum für neueste Forschungsergebnisse aus allen Teildisziplinen der Politikwissenschaft. Sie beinhaltet doppelblind begutachtete Beiträge aus der Politischen Theorie und Ideengeschichte, aus dem Bereich Analyse und Vergleich politischer Systeme, aus der Policy-Analyse, aus dem Bereich der Internationalen Beziehungen und der Außenpolitik, aus der empirischen Sozialforschung und Methodenlehre, der Politischen Soziologie sowie der Didaktik der Politikwissenschaft. Die in der PVS veröffentlichten Beiträge stammen von deutschen bzw. deutschsprachigen Politikwissenschaftler*innen sowie von internationalen Politikwissenschaftler*innen, die sich mit der deutschen bzw. deutschsprachigen Politikwissenschaft auseinandersetzen. Special Issues Das Special Issue soll die Möglichkeit bieten, auf thematische und theoretische Entwicklungen im Fach insgesamt oder in einzelnen Teildisziplinen zu reagieren, denen eine fachallgemeine Bedeutung zugeschrieben werden kann. Die Redaktion akquiriert mögliche Schwerpunkte eigenständig über entsprechende Call for Proposals, ist aber für entsprechende Initiativen und Vorschläge offen. In Special Issues werden mindestens sechs von Gastherausgeber*innen einzuwerbende Beiträge zusammengefasst und durch eine inhaltliche Einleitung durch die Gastherausgeber*innen ergänzt. Die Beiträge sollen schwerpunktmäßig Abhandlungen sein; es sind aber auch die Integration einer Literaturübersicht und/oder einer bis zwei Research Notes möglich. Veröffentlicht werden ausschließlich Beiträge, die erfolgreich das anonymisierte Gutachter*innenverfahren durchlaufen haben und für eine Veröffentlichung empfohlen wurden. Die PVS wird im Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) erfasst.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信