Mayo肘关节功能评分在术后患者中的可靠性检验。

Aaron Baessler, Robert Renn Eason, Myles R Joyce, Daniel T Dibaba, Jim Y Wan, Frederick M Azar, Tyler J Brolin, Thomas W Throckmorton
{"title":"Mayo肘关节功能评分在术后患者中的可靠性检验。","authors":"Aaron Baessler,&nbsp;Robert Renn Eason,&nbsp;Myles R Joyce,&nbsp;Daniel T Dibaba,&nbsp;Jim Y Wan,&nbsp;Frederick M Azar,&nbsp;Tyler J Brolin,&nbsp;Thomas W Throckmorton","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to determine intra-observer and inter-observer reliability of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Patients undergoing elbow surgery completed a MEPS questionnaire initially and another 2-3 weeks later. During the second interview, patients completed the Oxford Elbow Score (OES) for comparison. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) > 0.80 indicated substantial agreement. In 42 patients who had elbow surgery, the average MEPS score initially was 78 (range, 5-100, SD 22.4) and 77 (range, 5-100, SD 21.5) at second interview. The average normalized OES score was 79 (range, 17-100, SD 23.6). The ICC for MEPS scores at the two time points was 0.90, and the PCC between the MEPS and OES scores was 0.87, indicating substantial agreement. The MEPS has strong intra-observer reliability at different time points and strong inter-observer reliability when compared with the OES, validating the MEPS as an outcome measure of elbow surgery. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(4):229-232, 2022).</p>","PeriodicalId":17143,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":"31 4","pages":"229-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability Testing of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score in Post-operative Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Baessler,&nbsp;Robert Renn Eason,&nbsp;Myles R Joyce,&nbsp;Daniel T Dibaba,&nbsp;Jim Y Wan,&nbsp;Frederick M Azar,&nbsp;Tyler J Brolin,&nbsp;Thomas W Throckmorton\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to determine intra-observer and inter-observer reliability of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Patients undergoing elbow surgery completed a MEPS questionnaire initially and another 2-3 weeks later. During the second interview, patients completed the Oxford Elbow Score (OES) for comparison. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) > 0.80 indicated substantial agreement. In 42 patients who had elbow surgery, the average MEPS score initially was 78 (range, 5-100, SD 22.4) and 77 (range, 5-100, SD 21.5) at second interview. The average normalized OES score was 79 (range, 17-100, SD 23.6). The ICC for MEPS scores at the two time points was 0.90, and the PCC between the MEPS and OES scores was 0.87, indicating substantial agreement. The MEPS has strong intra-observer reliability at different time points and strong inter-observer reliability when compared with the OES, validating the MEPS as an outcome measure of elbow surgery. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(4):229-232, 2022).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"229-232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定Mayo肘部表现评分(MEPS)的观察者内部和观察者之间的信度。接受肘部手术的患者最初完成了一份MEPS问卷,并在2-3周后再次完成。在第二次访谈中,患者完成牛津肘部评分(OES)进行比较。类内相关系数(ICC)和皮尔逊相关系数(PCC)均> 0.80,表明两者具有较好的一致性。在42例肘部手术患者中,第二次访谈时平均MEPS评分为78(范围,5-100,SD 22.4)和77(范围,5-100,SD 21.5)。平均归一化OES评分为79(范围17-100,标准差23.6)。两个时间点MEPS得分的ICC为0.90,MEPS和OES得分之间的PCC为0.87,表明基本一致。与OES相比,MEPS在不同时间点具有较强的观察者内信度和较强的观察者间信度,验证了MEPS作为肘部手术结局指标的有效性。[j] .外科骨科进展,31(4):229- 232,2022。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability Testing of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score in Post-operative Patients.

This study aimed to determine intra-observer and inter-observer reliability of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Patients undergoing elbow surgery completed a MEPS questionnaire initially and another 2-3 weeks later. During the second interview, patients completed the Oxford Elbow Score (OES) for comparison. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) > 0.80 indicated substantial agreement. In 42 patients who had elbow surgery, the average MEPS score initially was 78 (range, 5-100, SD 22.4) and 77 (range, 5-100, SD 21.5) at second interview. The average normalized OES score was 79 (range, 17-100, SD 23.6). The ICC for MEPS scores at the two time points was 0.90, and the PCC between the MEPS and OES scores was 0.87, indicating substantial agreement. The MEPS has strong intra-observer reliability at different time points and strong inter-observer reliability when compared with the OES, validating the MEPS as an outcome measure of elbow surgery. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(4):229-232, 2022).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信