利用cliftonstrengths®提高牙科卫生学生的专业发展。

Q2 Dentistry
Leciel K Bono, JoAnn R Gurenlian, Colleen Stephenson, Rachelle Williams, Jessica August
{"title":"利用cliftonstrengths®提高牙科卫生学生的专业发展。","authors":"Leciel K Bono,&nbsp;JoAnn R Gurenlian,&nbsp;Colleen Stephenson,&nbsp;Rachelle Williams,&nbsp;Jessica August","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> Undergraduate dental hygiene education programs may not provide sufficient training in professional development to prepare graduates to be primary health care providers. The purpose of the year one of a two-year study was to apply the results from a strengths assessment instrument to entry-level dental hygiene students' learning experiences and faculty instruction of students.<b>Methods</b> An exploratory research design including quantitative and qualitative methods was used among a convenience sample of entry-level dental hygiene students. A validated assessment instrument (CliftonStrengths<sup>®</sup>) was used at the beginning of the academic year to determine the professional strengths of the participants. Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize the top five strengths of each participant. Focus group interviews were conducted to assess student and faculty perceptions of professional strengths based on learning experiences at the end of the first academic year. Virtual interviews were transcribed, and the codes and themes were identified. Investigator triangulation and member checks were used to validate responses.<b>Results</b> Thirty-two hygiene students and 28 faculty agreed to participate in the study. The top five strengths identified for both students and faculty (n=60) were in the executing, strategic and relationship building domains. All students (n=32) participated in the focus groups and the following themes were identified: awareness, application, positive approach, successful strategies, and personal growth. Of the faculty participants (n=28), 14 participated in the focus groups. Faculty themes identified were recognition, change in perspective, personalized approach, participatory environment, and empowerment.<b>Conclusion</b> Results this study highlight the potential benefits of a strengths-based approach to undergraduate dental hygiene education. Helping students utilize their professional strengths in a challenging educational setting may lead to increased empowerment, professional growth and development. Further study with year two data may offer an opportunity to understand how identification of professional strengths influences students' learning experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":52471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","volume":"97 1","pages":"43-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing CliftonStrengths<sup>®</sup> to Increase Professional Development in Dental Hygiene Students.\",\"authors\":\"Leciel K Bono,&nbsp;JoAnn R Gurenlian,&nbsp;Colleen Stephenson,&nbsp;Rachelle Williams,&nbsp;Jessica August\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> Undergraduate dental hygiene education programs may not provide sufficient training in professional development to prepare graduates to be primary health care providers. The purpose of the year one of a two-year study was to apply the results from a strengths assessment instrument to entry-level dental hygiene students' learning experiences and faculty instruction of students.<b>Methods</b> An exploratory research design including quantitative and qualitative methods was used among a convenience sample of entry-level dental hygiene students. A validated assessment instrument (CliftonStrengths<sup>®</sup>) was used at the beginning of the academic year to determine the professional strengths of the participants. Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize the top five strengths of each participant. Focus group interviews were conducted to assess student and faculty perceptions of professional strengths based on learning experiences at the end of the first academic year. Virtual interviews were transcribed, and the codes and themes were identified. Investigator triangulation and member checks were used to validate responses.<b>Results</b> Thirty-two hygiene students and 28 faculty agreed to participate in the study. The top five strengths identified for both students and faculty (n=60) were in the executing, strategic and relationship building domains. All students (n=32) participated in the focus groups and the following themes were identified: awareness, application, positive approach, successful strategies, and personal growth. Of the faculty participants (n=28), 14 participated in the focus groups. Faculty themes identified were recognition, change in perspective, personalized approach, participatory environment, and empowerment.<b>Conclusion</b> Results this study highlight the potential benefits of a strengths-based approach to undergraduate dental hygiene education. Helping students utilize their professional strengths in a challenging educational setting may lead to increased empowerment, professional growth and development. Further study with year two data may offer an opportunity to understand how identification of professional strengths influences students' learning experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"43-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本科口腔卫生教育项目可能无法提供足够的专业发展培训,使毕业生成为初级卫生保健提供者。本研究为期两年,目的是将优势评估工具的结果应用于初级口腔卫生学生的学习经验和教师对学生的指导。方法采用定量与定性相结合的探索性研究设计,对方便抽样的初级口腔卫生专业学生进行调查。在学年开始时,使用经过验证的评估工具(CliftonStrengths®)来确定参与者的专业优势。频率和百分比用于总结每个参与者的五大优势。焦点小组访谈是为了评估学生和教师在第一学年结束时基于学习经验对专业优势的看法。对虚拟采访进行了记录,并确定了代码和主题。研究者三角测量和成员检查被用来验证回应。结果32名卫生专业学生和28名教师同意参与研究。学生和教师(n=60)确定的五大优势分别是执行力、战略和关系建立领域。所有学生(n=32)参加了焦点小组,并确定了以下主题:意识,应用,积极的方法,成功的策略和个人成长。在教师参与者(n=28)中,14人参加了焦点小组。确定的教师主题包括认可、观点改变、个性化方法、参与性环境和赋权。结论:本研究强调了以优势为基础的方法对大学生口腔卫生教育的潜在益处。帮助学生在具有挑战性的教育环境中发挥他们的专业优势可能会增加他们的能力,促进他们的专业成长和发展。对二年级数据的进一步研究可能会提供一个机会来了解专业优势的识别如何影响学生的学习经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilizing CliftonStrengths® to Increase Professional Development in Dental Hygiene Students.

Purpose Undergraduate dental hygiene education programs may not provide sufficient training in professional development to prepare graduates to be primary health care providers. The purpose of the year one of a two-year study was to apply the results from a strengths assessment instrument to entry-level dental hygiene students' learning experiences and faculty instruction of students.Methods An exploratory research design including quantitative and qualitative methods was used among a convenience sample of entry-level dental hygiene students. A validated assessment instrument (CliftonStrengths®) was used at the beginning of the academic year to determine the professional strengths of the participants. Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize the top five strengths of each participant. Focus group interviews were conducted to assess student and faculty perceptions of professional strengths based on learning experiences at the end of the first academic year. Virtual interviews were transcribed, and the codes and themes were identified. Investigator triangulation and member checks were used to validate responses.Results Thirty-two hygiene students and 28 faculty agreed to participate in the study. The top five strengths identified for both students and faculty (n=60) were in the executing, strategic and relationship building domains. All students (n=32) participated in the focus groups and the following themes were identified: awareness, application, positive approach, successful strategies, and personal growth. Of the faculty participants (n=28), 14 participated in the focus groups. Faculty themes identified were recognition, change in perspective, personalized approach, participatory environment, and empowerment.Conclusion Results this study highlight the potential benefits of a strengths-based approach to undergraduate dental hygiene education. Helping students utilize their professional strengths in a challenging educational setting may lead to increased empowerment, professional growth and development. Further study with year two data may offer an opportunity to understand how identification of professional strengths influences students' learning experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Hygiene is the refereed, scientific publication of the American Dental Hygienists’ Association. It promotes the publication of original research related to the practice and education of dental hygiene. It supports the development and dissemination of a dental hygiene body of knowledge through scientific inquiry in basic, applied, and clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信