I-gelTM与百思达tm喉罩在麻醉患儿口咽漏压的比较。

Caren Candace Selvin, Geeta Singariya, Pooja Bihani, Manoj Kamal, Naveen Paliwal, Shobha Ujwal
{"title":"I-gelTM与百思达tm喉罩在麻醉患儿口咽漏压的比较。","authors":"Caren Candace Selvin,&nbsp;Geeta Singariya,&nbsp;Pooja Bihani,&nbsp;Manoj Kamal,&nbsp;Naveen Paliwal,&nbsp;Shobha Ujwal","doi":"10.17085/apm.22209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Supraglottic airways (SGA) are increasingly used in pediatric anesthesia.Among SGA, I-gelTM is a commonly used device in pediatric patients. The BlockbusterTM laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is latest addition in pediatric airway armamentarium. This studywas conducted to compare the clinical performance of I-gelTM and BlockbusterTM LMA in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 140 children aged 1-5 years, who were undergoing elective surgery,were randomized into two groups either I-gelTM (Group I) or BlockbusterTM LMA (Group B). Airway was secured with appropriate-sized LMA according to group allocation under generalanesthesia. The primary objective of study was oropharyngeal leak pressures (OPLP), andsecondary objectives were number of attempts of device insertion, success rate, ease ofLMA insertion, hemodynamic parameters, and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean OPLP was significantly higher for I-gelTM compared to BlockbusterTM LMA(27.97 ± 1.65 vs. 26.04 ± 2.12; P < 0.001). The devices were successfully inserted on thefirst attempt in 97.14% and 90% of the Group I and Group B respectively. The insertion time,ease of insertion, hemodynamic parameters and postoperative complications were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The I-gelTM was more efficacious device in term of OPLP than BlockbusterTMLMA for positive pressure ventilation in pediatric patients undergoing short surgical procedures under general anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7801,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"51-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cc/cc/apm-22209.PMC9902638.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of I-gelTM and BlockbusterTM laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized pediatric patients.\",\"authors\":\"Caren Candace Selvin,&nbsp;Geeta Singariya,&nbsp;Pooja Bihani,&nbsp;Manoj Kamal,&nbsp;Naveen Paliwal,&nbsp;Shobha Ujwal\",\"doi\":\"10.17085/apm.22209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Supraglottic airways (SGA) are increasingly used in pediatric anesthesia.Among SGA, I-gelTM is a commonly used device in pediatric patients. The BlockbusterTM laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is latest addition in pediatric airway armamentarium. This studywas conducted to compare the clinical performance of I-gelTM and BlockbusterTM LMA in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 140 children aged 1-5 years, who were undergoing elective surgery,were randomized into two groups either I-gelTM (Group I) or BlockbusterTM LMA (Group B). Airway was secured with appropriate-sized LMA according to group allocation under generalanesthesia. The primary objective of study was oropharyngeal leak pressures (OPLP), andsecondary objectives were number of attempts of device insertion, success rate, ease ofLMA insertion, hemodynamic parameters, and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean OPLP was significantly higher for I-gelTM compared to BlockbusterTM LMA(27.97 ± 1.65 vs. 26.04 ± 2.12; P < 0.001). The devices were successfully inserted on thefirst attempt in 97.14% and 90% of the Group I and Group B respectively. The insertion time,ease of insertion, hemodynamic parameters and postoperative complications were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The I-gelTM was more efficacious device in term of OPLP than BlockbusterTMLMA for positive pressure ventilation in pediatric patients undergoing short surgical procedures under general anesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia and pain medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"51-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cc/cc/apm-22209.PMC9902638.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia and pain medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.22209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.22209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:声门上气道(SGA)在小儿麻醉中的应用越来越广泛。在SGA中,I-gelTM是儿科患者常用的设备。百视达tm喉罩气道(LMA)是最新增加的儿科气道设备。本研究旨在比较I-gelTM和百视达tm LMA在儿科患者中的临床表现。方法:选取140例1 ~ 5岁择期手术患儿,随机分为I- geltm组(I组)和blockstertm LMA组(B组),在全身麻醉下按分组使用合适尺寸的LMA固定气道。研究的主要目标是口咽漏压(OPLP),次要目标是器械插入尝试次数、成功率、flma插入难易程度、血流动力学参数和术后咽部发病率。结果:I-gelTM的平均OPLP显著高于BlockbusterTM LMA(27.97±1.65∶26.04±2.12;P < 0.001)。第1组和第2组的器械首次插入成功率分别为97.14%和90%。两组间插入时间、插入难易程度、血流动力学参数及术后并发症具有可比性。结论:I-gelTM对于全麻下短时间手术患儿正压通气的OPLP比blockstertmlma更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of I-gelTM and BlockbusterTM laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized pediatric patients.

Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of I-gelTM and BlockbusterTM laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized pediatric patients.

Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of I-gelTM and BlockbusterTM laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized pediatric patients.

Background: Supraglottic airways (SGA) are increasingly used in pediatric anesthesia.Among SGA, I-gelTM is a commonly used device in pediatric patients. The BlockbusterTM laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is latest addition in pediatric airway armamentarium. This studywas conducted to compare the clinical performance of I-gelTM and BlockbusterTM LMA in pediatric patients.

Methods: A total of 140 children aged 1-5 years, who were undergoing elective surgery,were randomized into two groups either I-gelTM (Group I) or BlockbusterTM LMA (Group B). Airway was secured with appropriate-sized LMA according to group allocation under generalanesthesia. The primary objective of study was oropharyngeal leak pressures (OPLP), andsecondary objectives were number of attempts of device insertion, success rate, ease ofLMA insertion, hemodynamic parameters, and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidities.

Results: The mean OPLP was significantly higher for I-gelTM compared to BlockbusterTM LMA(27.97 ± 1.65 vs. 26.04 ± 2.12; P < 0.001). The devices were successfully inserted on thefirst attempt in 97.14% and 90% of the Group I and Group B respectively. The insertion time,ease of insertion, hemodynamic parameters and postoperative complications were comparable between groups.

Conclusions: The I-gelTM was more efficacious device in term of OPLP than BlockbusterTMLMA for positive pressure ventilation in pediatric patients undergoing short surgical procedures under general anesthesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信