粘菌素/左氧氟沙星与粘菌素/美罗培南治疗耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌引起的呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的疗效比较:一项随机对照临床试验

IF 2.1 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Mahnaz Momenzadeh, Rasool Soltani, Fatemeh Shafiee, Atousa Hakamifard, Morteza Pourahmad, Saeed Abbasi
{"title":"粘菌素/左氧氟沙星与粘菌素/美罗培南治疗耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌引起的呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的疗效比较:一项随机对照临床试验","authors":"Mahnaz Momenzadeh,&nbsp;Rasool Soltani,&nbsp;Fatemeh Shafiee,&nbsp;Atousa Hakamifard,&nbsp;Morteza Pourahmad,&nbsp;Saeed Abbasi","doi":"10.4103/1735-5362.363594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> (CRAB) is still a great challenge. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the colistin/levofloxacin regimen compared to the usual colistin/meropenem regimen in the treatment of patients with VAP caused by CRAB.</p><p><strong>Experimental approach: </strong>The patients with VAP were randomly assigned to experimental (n = 26) and control (n = 29) groups. The first group received IV colistin 4.5 MIU every 12 h + levofloxacin 750 mg IV daily, and the second group received IV colistin with the same dose + meropenem 1 g IV every 8 h for 10 days. The clinical (complete response, partial response, or treatment failure) and microbiological responses at the end of the intervention were recorded and compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Findings/results: </strong>The complete response rate was higher (n = 7; 35%) and the failure rate was lower (n = 4; 20%) in the experimental group than in the control group (n = 2; 8%, and n = 11; 44%, respectively), but the differences were not statistically significant. Even though the microbiological response rate was higher in the experimental group (n = 14; 70%) than in the control group (n = 12; 48%), the difference was not statistically significant. The mortality rate was 6 (23.10%) and 4 patients (13.8%) in the experimental and control groups, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.490).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and implication: </strong>The levofloxacin/colistin combination can be considered an alternative regimen to meropenem/colistin in the treatment of VAP caused by CRAB.</p>","PeriodicalId":21075,"journal":{"name":"Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"18 1","pages":"39-48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8b/5e/RPS-18-39.PMC9951781.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of colistin/levofloxacin compared to colistin/meropenem in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>: a randomized controlled clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mahnaz Momenzadeh,&nbsp;Rasool Soltani,&nbsp;Fatemeh Shafiee,&nbsp;Atousa Hakamifard,&nbsp;Morteza Pourahmad,&nbsp;Saeed Abbasi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/1735-5362.363594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> (CRAB) is still a great challenge. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the colistin/levofloxacin regimen compared to the usual colistin/meropenem regimen in the treatment of patients with VAP caused by CRAB.</p><p><strong>Experimental approach: </strong>The patients with VAP were randomly assigned to experimental (n = 26) and control (n = 29) groups. The first group received IV colistin 4.5 MIU every 12 h + levofloxacin 750 mg IV daily, and the second group received IV colistin with the same dose + meropenem 1 g IV every 8 h for 10 days. The clinical (complete response, partial response, or treatment failure) and microbiological responses at the end of the intervention were recorded and compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Findings/results: </strong>The complete response rate was higher (n = 7; 35%) and the failure rate was lower (n = 4; 20%) in the experimental group than in the control group (n = 2; 8%, and n = 11; 44%, respectively), but the differences were not statistically significant. Even though the microbiological response rate was higher in the experimental group (n = 14; 70%) than in the control group (n = 12; 48%), the difference was not statistically significant. The mortality rate was 6 (23.10%) and 4 patients (13.8%) in the experimental and control groups, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.490).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and implication: </strong>The levofloxacin/colistin combination can be considered an alternative regimen to meropenem/colistin in the treatment of VAP caused by CRAB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"39-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8b/5e/RPS-18-39.PMC9951781.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-5362.363594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-5362.363594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)引起的呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的治疗仍是一个巨大的挑战。本研究比较了粘菌素/左氧氟沙星方案与常规粘菌素/美罗培南方案在治疗由CRAB引起的VAP患者中的有效性。实验方法:将VAP患者随机分为实验组(n = 26)和对照组(n = 29)。第一组患者静脉注射粘菌素4.5 MIU / 12 h +左氧氟沙星750 mg / d;第二组患者静脉注射相同剂量的粘菌素+美罗培南1 g / 8 h,连续10 d。在干预结束时记录临床(完全缓解、部分缓解或治疗失败)和微生物反应,并比较两组之间的差异。发现/结果:完全缓解率较高(n = 7;35%),故障率较低(n = 4;20%),实验组比对照组多(n = 2;8%, n = 11;(分别为44%),但差异无统计学意义。尽管实验组的微生物反应率较高(n = 14;70%)高于对照组(n = 12;48%),差异无统计学意义。实验组死亡率为6例(23.10%),对照组死亡率为4例(13.8%)(P = 0.490)。结论与意义:左氧氟沙星/粘菌素联合用药可作为美罗培南/粘菌素联合用药治疗螃蟹所致VAP的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The effectiveness of colistin/levofloxacin compared to colistin/meropenem in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

The effectiveness of colistin/levofloxacin compared to colistin/meropenem in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

The effectiveness of colistin/levofloxacin compared to colistin/meropenem in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Background and purpose: The treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is still a great challenge. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the colistin/levofloxacin regimen compared to the usual colistin/meropenem regimen in the treatment of patients with VAP caused by CRAB.

Experimental approach: The patients with VAP were randomly assigned to experimental (n = 26) and control (n = 29) groups. The first group received IV colistin 4.5 MIU every 12 h + levofloxacin 750 mg IV daily, and the second group received IV colistin with the same dose + meropenem 1 g IV every 8 h for 10 days. The clinical (complete response, partial response, or treatment failure) and microbiological responses at the end of the intervention were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Findings/results: The complete response rate was higher (n = 7; 35%) and the failure rate was lower (n = 4; 20%) in the experimental group than in the control group (n = 2; 8%, and n = 11; 44%, respectively), but the differences were not statistically significant. Even though the microbiological response rate was higher in the experimental group (n = 14; 70%) than in the control group (n = 12; 48%), the difference was not statistically significant. The mortality rate was 6 (23.10%) and 4 patients (13.8%) in the experimental and control groups, respectively (P = 0.490).

Conclusion and implication: The levofloxacin/colistin combination can be considered an alternative regimen to meropenem/colistin in the treatment of VAP caused by CRAB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences
Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences (RPS) is included in Thomson Reuters ESCI Web of Science (searchable at WoS master journal list), indexed with PubMed and PubMed Central and abstracted in the Elsevier Bibliographic Databases. Databases include Scopus, EMBASE, EMCare, EMBiology and Elsevier BIOBASE. It is also indexed in several specialized databases including Scientific Information Database (SID), Google Scholar, Iran Medex, Magiran, Index Copernicus (IC) and Islamic World Science Citation Center (ISC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信