{"title":"氯己定粘粘凝胶预防呼吸机相关性肺炎的影响:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Faramarz Dobakhti, Ali Zargar, Taraneh Naghibi","doi":"10.30476/BEAT.2023.97509.1406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ventilator-associated pneumonia is the common cause of morbidity and mortality in the intensive care unit. Due to the antimicrobial effect of chlorhexidine, and the long-lasting result of mucoadhesive drugs, this study aimed to determine the effect of chlorhexidine mucoadhesive gel on the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critical patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this clinical trial, 64 ventilated patients were selected and randomly allocated into two groups. The first group received 0.2% chlorhexidine mucoadhesive gel and the second group received 0.2% chlorhexidine solution as a mouthwash. Every three days, the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia was evaluated by the clinical score of pulmonary infection. The data were analyzed by SPSS statistical software version 20.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in demographic characteristics between the two groups. In the control group, 25% of the patients had ventilator-associated pneumonia, while it was only 15.6% in the intervention group; however, the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia revealed no significant difference between the two groups (HR ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.49 to 1.83 <i>p</i> <i>=</i>0.356).In addition, there was no statistically significant difference between the number of days connected to the ventilator (<i>p</i> <i>=</i>0.854), the number of days hospitalized in the intensive care unit (<i>p</i> <i>=</i>0.423), and the death rate (<i>p</i> <i>=</i>0.634) between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although no significant statistical difference was detected between chlorhexidine mucoadhesive gel and chlorhexidine solution in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia, the incidence of pneumonia in the mucoadhesive gel group was clinically less than in the control group. It is better to repeat the study with a larger statistical population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9333,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","volume":"11 1","pages":"26-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/f4/bet-11-26.PMC9923030.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Chlorhexidine Mucoadhesive Gel in the Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Faramarz Dobakhti, Ali Zargar, Taraneh Naghibi\",\"doi\":\"10.30476/BEAT.2023.97509.1406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ventilator-associated pneumonia is the common cause of morbidity and mortality in the intensive care unit. Due to the antimicrobial effect of chlorhexidine, and the long-lasting result of mucoadhesive drugs, this study aimed to determine the effect of chlorhexidine mucoadhesive gel on the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critical patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this clinical trial, 64 ventilated patients were selected and randomly allocated into two groups. The first group received 0.2% chlorhexidine mucoadhesive gel and the second group received 0.2% chlorhexidine solution as a mouthwash. Every three days, the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia was evaluated by the clinical score of pulmonary infection. The data were analyzed by SPSS statistical software version 20.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in demographic characteristics between the two groups. In the control group, 25% of the patients had ventilator-associated pneumonia, while it was only 15.6% in the intervention group; however, the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia revealed no significant difference between the two groups (HR ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.49 to 1.83 <i>p</i> <i>=</i>0.356).In addition, there was no statistically significant difference between the number of days connected to the ventilator (<i>p</i> <i>=</i>0.854), the number of days hospitalized in the intensive care unit (<i>p</i> <i>=</i>0.423), and the death rate (<i>p</i> <i>=</i>0.634) between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although no significant statistical difference was detected between chlorhexidine mucoadhesive gel and chlorhexidine solution in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia, the incidence of pneumonia in the mucoadhesive gel group was clinically less than in the control group. It is better to repeat the study with a larger statistical population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of emergency and trauma\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"26-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/f4/bet-11-26.PMC9923030.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of emergency and trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2023.97509.1406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2023.97509.1406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:呼吸机相关性肺炎是重症监护病房发病和死亡的常见原因。鉴于氯己定的抗菌作用,以及黏附药物的长效性,本研究旨在探讨氯己定黏附凝胶对危重患者呼吸机相关性肺炎的预防作用。方法:本临床试验选择64例通气患者,随机分为两组。第一组给予0.2%洗必泰黏附凝胶,第二组给予0.2%洗必泰溶液作为漱口水。每隔三天,通过肺部感染临床评分评估呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率。采用SPSS统计软件第20版对数据进行分析。结果:两组患者人口学特征差异无统计学意义。对照组有25%的患者发生呼吸机相关性肺炎,干预组只有15.6%;但两组呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率无显著性差异(HR比0.86;95%置信区间,0.49 ~ 1.83 p =0.356)。此外,两组患者的呼吸机使用天数(p =0.854)、重症监护病房住院天数(p =0.423)和死亡率(p =0.634)差异无统计学意义。结论:氯己定黏附凝胶与氯己定溶液预防呼吸机相关性肺炎的效果虽无统计学差异,但黏附凝胶组肺炎的临床发生率低于对照组。最好在更大的统计人群中重复这项研究。
The Impact of Chlorhexidine Mucoadhesive Gel in the Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Objective: Ventilator-associated pneumonia is the common cause of morbidity and mortality in the intensive care unit. Due to the antimicrobial effect of chlorhexidine, and the long-lasting result of mucoadhesive drugs, this study aimed to determine the effect of chlorhexidine mucoadhesive gel on the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critical patients.
Method: In this clinical trial, 64 ventilated patients were selected and randomly allocated into two groups. The first group received 0.2% chlorhexidine mucoadhesive gel and the second group received 0.2% chlorhexidine solution as a mouthwash. Every three days, the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia was evaluated by the clinical score of pulmonary infection. The data were analyzed by SPSS statistical software version 20.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference in demographic characteristics between the two groups. In the control group, 25% of the patients had ventilator-associated pneumonia, while it was only 15.6% in the intervention group; however, the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia revealed no significant difference between the two groups (HR ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.49 to 1.83 p=0.356).In addition, there was no statistically significant difference between the number of days connected to the ventilator (p=0.854), the number of days hospitalized in the intensive care unit (p=0.423), and the death rate (p=0.634) between the two groups.
Conclusion: Although no significant statistical difference was detected between chlorhexidine mucoadhesive gel and chlorhexidine solution in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia, the incidence of pneumonia in the mucoadhesive gel group was clinically less than in the control group. It is better to repeat the study with a larger statistical population.
期刊介绍:
BEAT: Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma is an international, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal coping with original research contributing to the field of emergency medicine and trauma. BEAT is the official journal of the Trauma Research Center (TRC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Hungarian Trauma Society (HTS) and Lusitanian Association for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ALTEC/LATES) aiming to be a publication of international repute that serves as a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the emergency medicine and trauma. The aim of BEAT is to publish original research focusing on practicing and training of emergency medicine and trauma to publish peer-reviewed articles of current international interest in the form of original articles, brief communications, reviews, case reports, clinical images, and letters.