负重生活方式对步态运动学和动力学的影响。

IF 1.8 4区 计算机科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Hsin-Huan Wang, Wei-Chi Tsai, Chi-Yao Chang, Min-Hao Hung, Jui-Hung Tu, Ti Wu, Chia-Hsiang Chen
{"title":"负重生活方式对步态运动学和动力学的影响。","authors":"Hsin-Huan Wang,&nbsp;Wei-Chi Tsai,&nbsp;Chi-Yao Chang,&nbsp;Min-Hao Hung,&nbsp;Jui-Hung Tu,&nbsp;Ti Wu,&nbsp;Chia-Hsiang Chen","doi":"10.1155/2023/8022635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Backpacks are commonly worn by many people for multiple purposes. This study investigated the effects of habitual wearing of backpacks on lower limb kinematics and kinetics. Fourteen participants were recruited for analysis. All participants performed four randomly assigned scenarios, including running and walking at speeds of 3.5 and 1.5 m/s, respectively, with and without load carriage. The motion analysis system and force plate were used to investigate the lower limb kinematics and kinetics. A paired sample <i>t</i>-test was performed for statistical measurement with a significance level of <i>α</i> = .05. The results indicated that active force, breaking force, impact peak, loading rate, active peak, maximum braking, hip flexion, and hip range of motion were substantially higher under load carriage conditions than under walking condition, however, time to peak was lower. Conversely, during load carriage running, active force, braking impulse, time to peak, ankle plantarflexion, and ankle range of motion were all higher than those during running. Carrying a backpack weighing 10% of the body weight induced different foot strike patterns at both speeds; during load carriage walking, the hip tended to flex more; whereas, during load carriage running, the ankle tended to flex more. In conclusion, human body seems to adopt different gait strategies during load carriage walking and running. That is, the hip strategy is used during walking, while the ankle strategy is used during running.</p>","PeriodicalId":8029,"journal":{"name":"Applied Bionics and Biomechanics","volume":"2023 ","pages":"8022635"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931482/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Load Carriage Lifestyle on Kinematics and Kinetics of Gait.\",\"authors\":\"Hsin-Huan Wang,&nbsp;Wei-Chi Tsai,&nbsp;Chi-Yao Chang,&nbsp;Min-Hao Hung,&nbsp;Jui-Hung Tu,&nbsp;Ti Wu,&nbsp;Chia-Hsiang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/8022635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Backpacks are commonly worn by many people for multiple purposes. This study investigated the effects of habitual wearing of backpacks on lower limb kinematics and kinetics. Fourteen participants were recruited for analysis. All participants performed four randomly assigned scenarios, including running and walking at speeds of 3.5 and 1.5 m/s, respectively, with and without load carriage. The motion analysis system and force plate were used to investigate the lower limb kinematics and kinetics. A paired sample <i>t</i>-test was performed for statistical measurement with a significance level of <i>α</i> = .05. The results indicated that active force, breaking force, impact peak, loading rate, active peak, maximum braking, hip flexion, and hip range of motion were substantially higher under load carriage conditions than under walking condition, however, time to peak was lower. Conversely, during load carriage running, active force, braking impulse, time to peak, ankle plantarflexion, and ankle range of motion were all higher than those during running. Carrying a backpack weighing 10% of the body weight induced different foot strike patterns at both speeds; during load carriage walking, the hip tended to flex more; whereas, during load carriage running, the ankle tended to flex more. In conclusion, human body seems to adopt different gait strategies during load carriage walking and running. That is, the hip strategy is used during walking, while the ankle strategy is used during running.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Bionics and Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"8022635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931482/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Bionics and Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8022635\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Bionics and Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8022635","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背包通常被许多人用于多种用途。本研究探讨了习惯背背包对下肢运动学和动力学的影响。招募了14名参与者进行分析。所有参与者都进行了四种随机分配的场景,包括分别以3.5米/秒和1.5米/秒的速度跑步和步行,有和没有负重。采用运动分析系统和力板对下肢运动学和动力学进行了研究。采用配对样本t检验进行统计学检验,显著性水平为α = 0.05。结果表明,负重运输条件下的主动力、断裂力、冲击峰值、加载率、主动峰值、最大制动、髋关节屈曲和髋关节活动范围显著高于步行条件下的主动峰值,但达到峰值所需时间较步行条件下短。相反,负重负重跑时,主动力、制动冲量、峰值时间、踝关节跖屈度、踝关节活动范围均高于跑步时。在两种速度下,携带重量为体重10%的背包会导致不同的脚击模式;在负重车厢行走时,髋部有较大弯曲的趋势;然而,在负载车运行时,踝关节倾向于弯曲更多。综上所述,人体在负重行走和跑步过程中似乎采取了不同的步态策略。也就是说,走路时使用臀部的策略,跑步时使用脚踝的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of Load Carriage Lifestyle on Kinematics and Kinetics of Gait.

Effect of Load Carriage Lifestyle on Kinematics and Kinetics of Gait.

Effect of Load Carriage Lifestyle on Kinematics and Kinetics of Gait.

Effect of Load Carriage Lifestyle on Kinematics and Kinetics of Gait.

Backpacks are commonly worn by many people for multiple purposes. This study investigated the effects of habitual wearing of backpacks on lower limb kinematics and kinetics. Fourteen participants were recruited for analysis. All participants performed four randomly assigned scenarios, including running and walking at speeds of 3.5 and 1.5 m/s, respectively, with and without load carriage. The motion analysis system and force plate were used to investigate the lower limb kinematics and kinetics. A paired sample t-test was performed for statistical measurement with a significance level of α = .05. The results indicated that active force, breaking force, impact peak, loading rate, active peak, maximum braking, hip flexion, and hip range of motion were substantially higher under load carriage conditions than under walking condition, however, time to peak was lower. Conversely, during load carriage running, active force, braking impulse, time to peak, ankle plantarflexion, and ankle range of motion were all higher than those during running. Carrying a backpack weighing 10% of the body weight induced different foot strike patterns at both speeds; during load carriage walking, the hip tended to flex more; whereas, during load carriage running, the ankle tended to flex more. In conclusion, human body seems to adopt different gait strategies during load carriage walking and running. That is, the hip strategy is used during walking, while the ankle strategy is used during running.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-ROBOTICS
自引率
4.50%
发文量
338
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Bionics and Biomechanics publishes papers that seek to understand the mechanics of biological systems, or that use the functions of living organisms as inspiration for the design new devices. Such systems may be used as artificial replacements, or aids, for their original biological purpose, or be used in a different setting altogether.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信