评估配对比较法汇总不同群体排名的能力。

IF 1.4 4区 管理学 Q3 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Éva Orbán-Mihálykó, Csaba Mihálykó, László Gyarmati
{"title":"评估配对比较法汇总不同群体排名的能力。","authors":"Éva Orbán-Mihálykó, Csaba Mihálykó, László Gyarmati","doi":"10.1007/s10100-023-00839-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ranking and rating methods have outstanding significance in sports, mainly due to their capacity to predict results. In this paper we turn to their capacity to aggregate separate groups' rankings based on a small piece of information. We investigate under which conditions two or more separate groups can be trustworthily interwoven applying Thurstone motivated methods and an AHP based method. A theorem is proved which guarantees adequate unified ranking based on some links between the groups. We also analyse the robustness of the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":9689,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Operations Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the capacity of paired comparison methods to aggregate rankings of separate groups.\",\"authors\":\"Éva Orbán-Mihálykó, Csaba Mihálykó, László Gyarmati\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10100-023-00839-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ranking and rating methods have outstanding significance in sports, mainly due to their capacity to predict results. In this paper we turn to their capacity to aggregate separate groups' rankings based on a small piece of information. We investigate under which conditions two or more separate groups can be trustworthily interwoven applying Thurstone motivated methods and an AHP based method. A theorem is proved which guarantees adequate unified ranking based on some links between the groups. We also analyse the robustness of the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Journal of Operations Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924872/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Journal of Operations Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-023-00839-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-023-00839-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

排名和评级方法在体育运动中具有突出的意义,这主要是因为它们具有预测结果的能力。在本文中,我们将转而研究它们基于少量信息汇总不同群体排名的能力。我们运用瑟斯通激励法和基于 AHP 的方法,研究了在哪些条件下两个或多个独立组别可以值得信赖地交织在一起。我们证明了一个定理,该定理保证了基于组与组之间某些联系的适当统一排名。我们还分析了结果的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating the capacity of paired comparison methods to aggregate rankings of separate groups.

Evaluating the capacity of paired comparison methods to aggregate rankings of separate groups.

Evaluating the capacity of paired comparison methods to aggregate rankings of separate groups.

Evaluating the capacity of paired comparison methods to aggregate rankings of separate groups.

Ranking and rating methods have outstanding significance in sports, mainly due to their capacity to predict results. In this paper we turn to their capacity to aggregate separate groups' rankings based on a small piece of information. We investigate under which conditions two or more separate groups can be trustworthily interwoven applying Thurstone motivated methods and an AHP based method. A theorem is proved which guarantees adequate unified ranking based on some links between the groups. We also analyse the robustness of the results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Operations Research
Central European Journal of Operations Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
30
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Central European Journal of Operations Research provides an international readership with high quality papers that cover the theory and practice of OR and the relationship of OR methods to modern quantitative economics and business administration. The focus is on topics such as: - finance and banking - measuring productivity and efficiency in the public sector - environmental and energy issues - computational tools for strategic decision support - production management and logistics - planning and scheduling The journal publishes theoretical papers as well as application-oriented contributions and practical case studies. Occasionally, special issues feature a particular area of OR or report on the results of scientific meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信