{"title":"是什么困扰着美国国立卫生研究院同行评审研究部门，以及如何修正拨款申请的评审过程。","authors":"Ali J Marian","doi":"10.20517/jca.2023.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concern has been on my mind for a while, but I had procrastinated putting it down on paper till now. It was the recent announcement by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Center for Scientific Review on the proposed changes to the review criteria of the grant applications submitted to the NIH study sections that provided the impetus to write this opinion article. The Christmas holidays provided the time needed to write it. Accordingly, “NIH proposes to reorganize the (current) five review criteria into three factors” as follows:","PeriodicalId":75051,"journal":{"name":"The journal of cardiovascular aging","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What ails the NIH peer review study sections and how to fix the review process of the grant applications.\",\"authors\":\"Ali J Marian\",\"doi\":\"10.20517/jca.2023.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concern has been on my mind for a while, but I had procrastinated putting it down on paper till now. It was the recent announcement by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Center for Scientific Review on the proposed changes to the review criteria of the grant applications submitted to the NIH study sections that provided the impetus to write this opinion article. The Christmas holidays provided the time needed to write it. Accordingly, “NIH proposes to reorganize the (current) five review criteria into three factors” as follows:\",\"PeriodicalId\":75051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of cardiovascular aging\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933949/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of cardiovascular aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20517/jca.2023.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of cardiovascular aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/jca.2023.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
What ails the NIH peer review study sections and how to fix the review process of the grant applications.
The concern has been on my mind for a while, but I had procrastinated putting it down on paper till now. It was the recent announcement by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Center for Scientific Review on the proposed changes to the review criteria of the grant applications submitted to the NIH study sections that provided the impetus to write this opinion article. The Christmas holidays provided the time needed to write it. Accordingly, “NIH proposes to reorganize the (current) five review criteria into three factors” as follows:
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
