关于假化石的传说是始新世动物

IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
John R. Dolan
{"title":"关于假化石的传说是始新世动物","authors":"John R. Dolan","doi":"10.1016/j.ejop.2022.125955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Eozoon canadense</em><span>, 'the dawn animal of Canada', a large foraminifera, was announced in 1864 as the oldest fossil organism known. Camps soon formed into disbelievers of its fossil nature, agnostics, and “Eozoonists”. </span><em>Eozoon</em> would number among its proponents major figures of the time. The saga of <em>Eozoon</em>, or more precisely the dispute as to its actual nature, spawned hundreds of publications. Here the story is told with a new focus, one on the stature and roles of the major personalities involved, and the evidence they presented. <em>Eozoon</em> is considered to have been 'de-bunked' in the late 19th century. However, it will be shown that it was never indisputably proven to be inorganic. Rather <em>Eozoon</em> simply faded away after its most ardent defenders died. As late as 1947, it was shown as the primordial organism in a biology textbook. The saga of <em>Eozoon</em> remains as a valuable cautionary tale. It is an example of an artifact accepted as fact because it filled a troubling void in knowledge, i.e., at that time, the first traces of life before Cambrian, and it endured because it was promoted by only a few, but powerful, figures in the scientific establishment of the era.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12042,"journal":{"name":"European journal of protistology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The saga of the false fossil foram Eozoon\",\"authors\":\"John R. Dolan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejop.2022.125955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Eozoon canadense</em><span>, 'the dawn animal of Canada', a large foraminifera, was announced in 1864 as the oldest fossil organism known. Camps soon formed into disbelievers of its fossil nature, agnostics, and “Eozoonists”. </span><em>Eozoon</em> would number among its proponents major figures of the time. The saga of <em>Eozoon</em>, or more precisely the dispute as to its actual nature, spawned hundreds of publications. Here the story is told with a new focus, one on the stature and roles of the major personalities involved, and the evidence they presented. <em>Eozoon</em> is considered to have been 'de-bunked' in the late 19th century. However, it will be shown that it was never indisputably proven to be inorganic. Rather <em>Eozoon</em> simply faded away after its most ardent defenders died. As late as 1947, it was shown as the primordial organism in a biology textbook. The saga of <em>Eozoon</em> remains as a valuable cautionary tale. It is an example of an artifact accepted as fact because it filled a troubling void in knowledge, i.e., at that time, the first traces of life before Cambrian, and it endured because it was promoted by only a few, but powerful, figures in the scientific establishment of the era.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of protistology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of protistology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S093247392200092X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of protistology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S093247392200092X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加拿大始兽,“加拿大的黎明动物”,一种大型有孔虫,于1864年被宣布为已知最古老的化石生物。营地很快就形成了对其化石性质的怀疑者、不可知论者和“始新世动物论者”。Eozoon将是当时的主要支持者之一。Eozoon的传奇故事,或者更准确地说是关于其实际性质的争论,催生了数百份出版物。在这里,故事以一个新的焦点讲述,一个关于相关主要人物的地位和角色,以及他们提供的证据。早在19世纪末,人们就认为Eozoon已经“脱壳”了。然而,这将表明,它从未被无可争议地证明是无机的。相反,Eozoon在其最热心的捍卫者去世后就消失了。直到1947年,它在生物学教科书中被显示为原始生物。Eozoon的传奇故事仍然是一个有价值的警示故事。这是一个被公认为事实的人工制品的例子,因为它填补了知识中令人不安的空白,即当时寒武纪之前的第一批生命痕迹,它之所以经久不衰,是因为它在那个时代的科学建立中只得到了少数但有权势的人物的推动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The saga of the false fossil foram Eozoon

Eozoon canadense, 'the dawn animal of Canada', a large foraminifera, was announced in 1864 as the oldest fossil organism known. Camps soon formed into disbelievers of its fossil nature, agnostics, and “Eozoonists”. Eozoon would number among its proponents major figures of the time. The saga of Eozoon, or more precisely the dispute as to its actual nature, spawned hundreds of publications. Here the story is told with a new focus, one on the stature and roles of the major personalities involved, and the evidence they presented. Eozoon is considered to have been 'de-bunked' in the late 19th century. However, it will be shown that it was never indisputably proven to be inorganic. Rather Eozoon simply faded away after its most ardent defenders died. As late as 1947, it was shown as the primordial organism in a biology textbook. The saga of Eozoon remains as a valuable cautionary tale. It is an example of an artifact accepted as fact because it filled a troubling void in knowledge, i.e., at that time, the first traces of life before Cambrian, and it endured because it was promoted by only a few, but powerful, figures in the scientific establishment of the era.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of protistology
European journal of protistology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
20.70%
发文量
55
审稿时长
14.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles deal with protists, unicellular organisms encountered free-living in various habitats or as parasites or used in basic research or applications. The European Journal of Protistology covers topics such as the structure and systematics of protists, their development, ecology, molecular biology and physiology. Beside publishing original articles the journal offers a forum for announcing scientific meetings. Reviews of recently published books are included as well. With its diversity of topics, the European Journal of Protistology is an essential source of information for every active protistologist and for biologists of various fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信