骨盆脆性骨折:目前的实践和未来的方向。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Lynn Hutchings, Darren M Roffey, Kelly A Lefaivre
{"title":"骨盆脆性骨折:目前的实践和未来的方向。","authors":"Lynn Hutchings,&nbsp;Darren M Roffey,&nbsp;Kelly A Lefaivre","doi":"10.1007/s11914-022-00760-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To summarise the current evidence and clinical practices for patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>FFPs are an increasingly prevalent and recognised problem in the elderly population. Recent evidence indicates they have a significant impact on function, morbidity and mortality. While traditional management of FFPs was predominantly non-surgical, surgical options have been increasingly used, with a range of surgical methods available. To date, limited consensus exists on the optimal strategy for suitable patient selection, and clinical trials in this population have proved problematic. The management of FFPs requires a multi-faceted approach to enhance patient care, including adequate pain control, minimisation of complications and optimisation of medical management. Early return to mobilisation should be a key treatment goal to maintain functional independence. The selection of patients who will maximally benefit from surgical treatment, and the most appropriate surgical strategy to employ, remains contentious.</p>","PeriodicalId":11080,"journal":{"name":"Current Osteoporosis Reports","volume":"20 6","pages":"469-477"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: Current Practices and Future Directions.\",\"authors\":\"Lynn Hutchings,&nbsp;Darren M Roffey,&nbsp;Kelly A Lefaivre\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11914-022-00760-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To summarise the current evidence and clinical practices for patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>FFPs are an increasingly prevalent and recognised problem in the elderly population. Recent evidence indicates they have a significant impact on function, morbidity and mortality. While traditional management of FFPs was predominantly non-surgical, surgical options have been increasingly used, with a range of surgical methods available. To date, limited consensus exists on the optimal strategy for suitable patient selection, and clinical trials in this population have proved problematic. The management of FFPs requires a multi-faceted approach to enhance patient care, including adequate pain control, minimisation of complications and optimisation of medical management. Early return to mobilisation should be a key treatment goal to maintain functional independence. The selection of patients who will maximally benefit from surgical treatment, and the most appropriate surgical strategy to employ, remains contentious.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Osteoporosis Reports\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"469-477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Osteoporosis Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-022-00760-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Osteoporosis Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-022-00760-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:总结骨盆脆性骨折(FFP)患者的现有证据和临床实践。最近的研究发现:FFPs在老年人群中日益普遍和公认的问题。最近的证据表明,它们对功能、发病率和死亡率有重大影响。虽然FFPs的传统治疗主要是非手术治疗,但越来越多的人选择手术治疗,有多种手术方法可供选择。迄今为止,关于合适患者选择的最佳策略存在有限的共识,并且在该人群中的临床试验证明存在问题。ffp的管理需要采取多方面的方法来加强患者护理,包括适当的疼痛控制、尽量减少并发症和优化医疗管理。尽早恢复活动应是维持功能独立的关键治疗目标。选择患者谁将最大限度地受益于手术治疗,并采用最合适的手术策略,仍然存在争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: Current Practices and Future Directions.

Purpose of review: To summarise the current evidence and clinical practices for patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP).

Recent findings: FFPs are an increasingly prevalent and recognised problem in the elderly population. Recent evidence indicates they have a significant impact on function, morbidity and mortality. While traditional management of FFPs was predominantly non-surgical, surgical options have been increasingly used, with a range of surgical methods available. To date, limited consensus exists on the optimal strategy for suitable patient selection, and clinical trials in this population have proved problematic. The management of FFPs requires a multi-faceted approach to enhance patient care, including adequate pain control, minimisation of complications and optimisation of medical management. Early return to mobilisation should be a key treatment goal to maintain functional independence. The selection of patients who will maximally benefit from surgical treatment, and the most appropriate surgical strategy to employ, remains contentious.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Osteoporosis Reports
Current Osteoporosis Reports Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of osteoporosis. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as current and future therapeutics, epidemiology and pathophysiology, and evaluation and management. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信