在美国社区肿瘤实践中,809名医生诊断的原发性血小板增多症患者接受细胞减少治疗的回顾性图表回顾。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Jingbo Yu, Dilan Paranagama, Becky Hanna, Jackson Tang, Aleksander Chojecki
{"title":"在美国社区肿瘤实践中,809名医生诊断的原发性血小板增多症患者接受细胞减少治疗的回顾性图表回顾。","authors":"Jingbo Yu,&nbsp;Dilan Paranagama,&nbsp;Becky Hanna,&nbsp;Jackson Tang,&nbsp;Aleksander Chojecki","doi":"10.1159/000526599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This analysis reports demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with physician-diagnosed essential thrombocythemia (ET) receiving cytoreductive therapy in US community clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient characteristics, medical history, diagnostic test results, signs/symptoms, treatment patterns, and physician practice settings were extracted from medical charts for patients with physician-diagnosed ET receiving cytoreductive therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 809 patients (51.1% female; 75.4% White; median age, 69 years) from 50 community practices, 64.5% had physician-reported diagnosis per World Health Organization criteria. Only 48.8% underwent diagnostic bone marrow biopsies; 87.5% had JAK2 mutation testing. Among those tested, 512/708 (72.3%), 57/213 (26.8%), and 37/213 (17.4%) had JAK2, CALR, and MPLmutations, respectively. Of physician-assigned risk assessments, 41.8% were misclassifications based on data-derived risk assessment. Most patients (93.3%) received first-line hydroxyurea (HU) cytoreductive therapy. Discontinuations were primarily for intolerance (35.4%) and resistance (23.8%). Of those who discontinued, 65.9% received no subsequent therapy and had higher ET symptom rates at last visit versus patients continuing HU (48.8% vs. 25.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows notable gaps in ET diagnosis and management. Half of patients were diagnosed without bone marrow biopsy, many received incorrect risk assignment, and the majority who discontinued HU received no subsequent therapy despite continued need.</p>","PeriodicalId":6981,"journal":{"name":"Acta Haematologica","volume":"146 1","pages":"26-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Retrospective Chart Review of 809 Patients with Physician-Diagnosed Essential Thrombocythemia Receiving Cytoreductive Therapy in US Community Oncology Practices.\",\"authors\":\"Jingbo Yu,&nbsp;Dilan Paranagama,&nbsp;Becky Hanna,&nbsp;Jackson Tang,&nbsp;Aleksander Chojecki\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000526599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This analysis reports demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with physician-diagnosed essential thrombocythemia (ET) receiving cytoreductive therapy in US community clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient characteristics, medical history, diagnostic test results, signs/symptoms, treatment patterns, and physician practice settings were extracted from medical charts for patients with physician-diagnosed ET receiving cytoreductive therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 809 patients (51.1% female; 75.4% White; median age, 69 years) from 50 community practices, 64.5% had physician-reported diagnosis per World Health Organization criteria. Only 48.8% underwent diagnostic bone marrow biopsies; 87.5% had JAK2 mutation testing. Among those tested, 512/708 (72.3%), 57/213 (26.8%), and 37/213 (17.4%) had JAK2, CALR, and MPLmutations, respectively. Of physician-assigned risk assessments, 41.8% were misclassifications based on data-derived risk assessment. Most patients (93.3%) received first-line hydroxyurea (HU) cytoreductive therapy. Discontinuations were primarily for intolerance (35.4%) and resistance (23.8%). Of those who discontinued, 65.9% received no subsequent therapy and had higher ET symptom rates at last visit versus patients continuing HU (48.8% vs. 25.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows notable gaps in ET diagnosis and management. Half of patients were diagnosed without bone marrow biopsy, many received incorrect risk assignment, and the majority who discontinued HU received no subsequent therapy despite continued need.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Haematologica\",\"volume\":\"146 1\",\"pages\":\"26-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Haematologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526599\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Haematologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本分析报告了在美国社区临床实践中接受细胞减少治疗的医生诊断的原发性血小板增多症(ET)患者的人口统计学和临床特征。方法:从接受细胞减少治疗的经医生诊断的ET患者的病历中提取患者特征、病史、诊断测试结果、体征/症状、治疗模式和医生执业背景。结果:809例患者中,女性占51.1%;75.4%的白人;年龄中位数为69岁),根据世界卫生组织的标准,64.5%的人有医生报告的诊断。只有48.8%的人接受了诊断性骨髓活检;87.5%的人有JAK2突变检测。在这些检测中,512/708(72.3%)、57/213(26.8%)和37/213(17.4%)分别有JAK2、CALR和mpl突变。在医生指定的风险评估中,41.8%是基于数据衍生风险评估的错误分类。大多数患者(93.3%)接受一线羟基脲(HU)细胞减少治疗。停药主要是因为不耐受(35.4%)和耐药(23.8%)。在停止治疗的患者中,65.9%的患者没有接受后续治疗,与持续HU的患者相比,最后一次就诊时ET症状率更高(48.8%对25.0%)。结论:本研究显示ET的诊断和处理存在明显差距。一半的患者在诊断时没有进行骨髓活检,许多患者接受了不正确的风险分配,大多数停用HU的患者尽管继续需要,但没有接受后续治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Retrospective Chart Review of 809 Patients with Physician-Diagnosed Essential Thrombocythemia Receiving Cytoreductive Therapy in US Community Oncology Practices.

Introduction: This analysis reports demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with physician-diagnosed essential thrombocythemia (ET) receiving cytoreductive therapy in US community clinical practice.

Methods: Patient characteristics, medical history, diagnostic test results, signs/symptoms, treatment patterns, and physician practice settings were extracted from medical charts for patients with physician-diagnosed ET receiving cytoreductive therapy.

Results: Among 809 patients (51.1% female; 75.4% White; median age, 69 years) from 50 community practices, 64.5% had physician-reported diagnosis per World Health Organization criteria. Only 48.8% underwent diagnostic bone marrow biopsies; 87.5% had JAK2 mutation testing. Among those tested, 512/708 (72.3%), 57/213 (26.8%), and 37/213 (17.4%) had JAK2, CALR, and MPLmutations, respectively. Of physician-assigned risk assessments, 41.8% were misclassifications based on data-derived risk assessment. Most patients (93.3%) received first-line hydroxyurea (HU) cytoreductive therapy. Discontinuations were primarily for intolerance (35.4%) and resistance (23.8%). Of those who discontinued, 65.9% received no subsequent therapy and had higher ET symptom rates at last visit versus patients continuing HU (48.8% vs. 25.0%).

Conclusion: This study shows notable gaps in ET diagnosis and management. Half of patients were diagnosed without bone marrow biopsy, many received incorrect risk assignment, and the majority who discontinued HU received no subsequent therapy despite continued need.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Haematologica
Acta Haematologica 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Acta Haematologica'' is a well-established and internationally recognized clinically-oriented journal featuring balanced, wide-ranging coverage of current hematology research. A wealth of information on such problems as anemia, leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, hereditary disorders, blood coagulation, growth factors, hematopoiesis and differentiation is contained in first-rate basic and clinical papers some of which are accompanied by editorial comments by eminent experts. These are supplemented by short state-of-the-art communications, reviews and correspondence as well as occasional special issues devoted to ‘hot topics’ in hematology. These will keep the practicing hematologist well informed of the new developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信