68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT检测整合素αvβ3表达及18F-FDG PET/CT检测食管癌和胃食管癌糖代谢的比较

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Matthieu Dietz, Vincent Dunet, Styliani Mantziari, Anastasia Pomoni, Ricardo Dias Correia, Nathalie Testart Dardel, Sarah Boughdad, Marie Nicod Lalonde, Giorgio Treglia, Markus Schafer, Niklaus Schaefer, John O Prior
{"title":"68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT检测整合素αvβ3表达及18F-FDG PET/CT检测食管癌和胃食管癌糖代谢的比较","authors":"Matthieu Dietz,&nbsp;Vincent Dunet,&nbsp;Styliani Mantziari,&nbsp;Anastasia Pomoni,&nbsp;Ricardo Dias Correia,&nbsp;Nathalie Testart Dardel,&nbsp;Sarah Boughdad,&nbsp;Marie Nicod Lalonde,&nbsp;Giorgio Treglia,&nbsp;Markus Schafer,&nbsp;Niklaus Schaefer,&nbsp;John O Prior","doi":"10.1186/s41824-023-00162-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary aims of this study were to compare in patients with esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers the potential of <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT with that of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT regarding tumoral uptake and distribution, as well as histopathologic examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD and ten <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT were performed in nine prospectively included participants (1 woman; aged 58 ± 8.4 y, range 40-69 y). Maximum SUV (SUV<sub>max</sub>) and metabolic tumor volumes (MTV) were calculated. The Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman correlation analysis (ρ) were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT detected positive uptake in 10 primary sites (8 for primary tumors and 2 for local relapse suspicion), 6 lymph nodes and 3 skeletal sites. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT detected positive uptake in the same sites but also in 16 additional lymph nodes and 1 adrenal gland. On a lesion-based analysis, SUV<sub>max</sub> of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG was significantly higher than those of <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD (4.9 [3.7-11.3] vs. 3.2 [2.6-4.2] g/mL, p = 0.014). Only one participant showed a higher SUV<sub>max</sub> in an osseous metastasis with <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD as compared to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG (6.6 vs. 3.9 g/mL). Correlation analysis showed positive correlation between <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET parameters (ρ = 0.56, p = 0.012 for SUV<sub>max</sub>, ρ = 0.78, p < 0.001 for lesion-to-background ratios and ρ = 0.58, p = 0.024 for MTV). We observed that <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake was homogenous inside all the confirmed primary sites (n = 9). In contrast, <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET showed more heterogenous uptake in 6 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (67%), seen mostly in the periphery of the tumor in 5 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (56%), and showed slight extensions into perilesional structures in 5 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (56%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD has lower potential in the detection of esophageal or esophagogastric junction malignancies compared to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG. However, the results suggest that PET imaging of integrin α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>3</sub> expression may provide complementary information and could aid in tumor diversity and delineation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Trial registration: NCT02666547. Registered January 28, 2016-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02666547 .</p>","PeriodicalId":36160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging","volume":"7 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of integrin α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>3</sub> expression with <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers.\",\"authors\":\"Matthieu Dietz,&nbsp;Vincent Dunet,&nbsp;Styliani Mantziari,&nbsp;Anastasia Pomoni,&nbsp;Ricardo Dias Correia,&nbsp;Nathalie Testart Dardel,&nbsp;Sarah Boughdad,&nbsp;Marie Nicod Lalonde,&nbsp;Giorgio Treglia,&nbsp;Markus Schafer,&nbsp;Niklaus Schaefer,&nbsp;John O Prior\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41824-023-00162-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary aims of this study were to compare in patients with esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers the potential of <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT with that of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT regarding tumoral uptake and distribution, as well as histopathologic examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD and ten <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT were performed in nine prospectively included participants (1 woman; aged 58 ± 8.4 y, range 40-69 y). Maximum SUV (SUV<sub>max</sub>) and metabolic tumor volumes (MTV) were calculated. The Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman correlation analysis (ρ) were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT detected positive uptake in 10 primary sites (8 for primary tumors and 2 for local relapse suspicion), 6 lymph nodes and 3 skeletal sites. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT detected positive uptake in the same sites but also in 16 additional lymph nodes and 1 adrenal gland. On a lesion-based analysis, SUV<sub>max</sub> of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG was significantly higher than those of <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD (4.9 [3.7-11.3] vs. 3.2 [2.6-4.2] g/mL, p = 0.014). Only one participant showed a higher SUV<sub>max</sub> in an osseous metastasis with <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD as compared to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG (6.6 vs. 3.9 g/mL). Correlation analysis showed positive correlation between <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET parameters (ρ = 0.56, p = 0.012 for SUV<sub>max</sub>, ρ = 0.78, p < 0.001 for lesion-to-background ratios and ρ = 0.58, p = 0.024 for MTV). We observed that <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake was homogenous inside all the confirmed primary sites (n = 9). In contrast, <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET showed more heterogenous uptake in 6 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (67%), seen mostly in the periphery of the tumor in 5 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (56%), and showed slight extensions into perilesional structures in 5 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (56%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD has lower potential in the detection of esophageal or esophagogastric junction malignancies compared to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG. However, the results suggest that PET imaging of integrin α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>3</sub> expression may provide complementary information and could aid in tumor diversity and delineation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Trial registration: NCT02666547. Registered January 28, 2016-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02666547 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889587/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-023-00162-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-023-00162-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的主要目的是比较68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT与18F-FDG PET/CT在食管癌或食管胃结癌患者肿瘤摄取和分布以及组织病理学检查方面的潜力。方法:对9名前瞻性纳入的参与者(1名女性;年龄58±8.4岁,范围40 ~ 69岁),计算最大SUV (SUVmax)和代谢肿瘤体积(MTV)。采用Mann-Whitney U检验和Spearman相关分析(ρ)。结果:68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT在10个原发部位(8个原发肿瘤,2个怀疑局部复发)、6个淋巴结和3个骨骼部位检出摄取阳性。18F-FDG PET/CT在相同部位检测到阳性摄取,但在另外16个淋巴结和1个肾上腺中也检测到阳性摄取。在基于病变的分析中,18F-FDG的SUVmax显著高于68Ga-NODAGA-RGD (4.9 [3.7-11.3] vs. 3.2 [2.6-4.2] g/mL, p = 0.014)。与18F-FDG相比,只有一名参与者在68Ga-NODAGA-RGD骨转移中表现出更高的SUVmax (6.6 g/mL vs. 3.9 g/mL)。相关分析显示,18F-FDG与68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET参数呈正相关(ρ = 0.56, SUVmax为p = 0.012, ρ = 0.78,所有确认原发部位的18F-FDG摄取均均匀(n = 9)。相比之下,68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET在9个确诊原发部位中有6个(67%)显示更多的异质摄取,在9个确诊原发部位中有5个(56%)主要出现在肿瘤周围,在9个确诊原发部位中有5个(56%)显示轻微扩展到病灶周围结构。结论:综上所述,68Ga-NODAGA-RGD对食管或食管胃交界恶性肿瘤的检测潜力低于18F-FDG。然而,结果表明,整合素αvβ3表达的PET成像可能提供补充信息,有助于肿瘤多样性和描绘。试验注册:试验注册:NCT02666547。2016年1月28日注册-回顾性注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02666547。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of integrin α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>3</sub> expression with <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers.

Comparison of integrin α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>3</sub> expression with <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers.

Comparison of integrin α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>3</sub> expression with <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers.

Comparison of integrin αvβ3 expression with 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT and glucose metabolism with 18F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers.

Background: The primary aims of this study were to compare in patients with esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers the potential of 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT with that of 18F-FDG PET/CT regarding tumoral uptake and distribution, as well as histopathologic examination.

Methods: Ten 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD and ten 18F-FDG PET/CT were performed in nine prospectively included participants (1 woman; aged 58 ± 8.4 y, range 40-69 y). Maximum SUV (SUVmax) and metabolic tumor volumes (MTV) were calculated. The Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman correlation analysis (ρ) were used.

Results: 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET/CT detected positive uptake in 10 primary sites (8 for primary tumors and 2 for local relapse suspicion), 6 lymph nodes and 3 skeletal sites. 18F-FDG PET/CT detected positive uptake in the same sites but also in 16 additional lymph nodes and 1 adrenal gland. On a lesion-based analysis, SUVmax of 18F-FDG was significantly higher than those of 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD (4.9 [3.7-11.3] vs. 3.2 [2.6-4.2] g/mL, p = 0.014). Only one participant showed a higher SUVmax in an osseous metastasis with 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD as compared to 18F-FDG (6.6 vs. 3.9 g/mL). Correlation analysis showed positive correlation between 18F-FDG and 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET parameters (ρ = 0.56, p = 0.012 for SUVmax, ρ = 0.78, p < 0.001 for lesion-to-background ratios and ρ = 0.58, p = 0.024 for MTV). We observed that 18F-FDG uptake was homogenous inside all the confirmed primary sites (n = 9). In contrast, 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD PET showed more heterogenous uptake in 6 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (67%), seen mostly in the periphery of the tumor in 5 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (56%), and showed slight extensions into perilesional structures in 5 out of the 9 confirmed primary sites (56%).

Conclusions: In conclusion, 68Ga-NODAGA-RGD has lower potential in the detection of esophageal or esophagogastric junction malignancies compared to 18F-FDG. However, the results suggest that PET imaging of integrin αvβ3 expression may provide complementary information and could aid in tumor diversity and delineation.

Trial registration: Trial registration: NCT02666547. Registered January 28, 2016-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02666547 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging Computer Science-Computer Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信