急诊科压力损伤筛查:概念分析。

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING
NURSING FORUM Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1111/nuf.12806
Laura Ogle, Mikel W Hand, Constance Swenty
{"title":"急诊科压力损伤筛查:概念分析。","authors":"Laura Ogle,&nbsp;Mikel W Hand,&nbsp;Constance Swenty","doi":"10.1111/nuf.12806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This concept analysis analyzes pressure injury screening in the emergency department setting using Walker and Avant's approach.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure injury treatment cost in the United States totals over 11 billion dollars annually. Although a pressure injury could develop in the few hours a patient is in the emergency department, there is little guidance on how an emergency department should screen, prevent, and treat patients.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>Five sources resulted from database searches of CINAHL full-text, Health Business FullTEXT, and MEDLINE with Full Text. Key search terms used to narrow the search consist of the following terminology: \"pressure injury\" OR \"pressure ulcer\" AND \"screening\" AND \"risk factors\" AND \"emergency room\" OR \"emergency department.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Walker and Avant's method of concept analysis was used to clarify the concept of pressure injury screening in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The concept analysis identified two attributes of pressure injury screening in the emergency department: patient length of stay and the cost of pressure injury treatment. Antecedents identified are patient risk factors: age, mobility status, sensory perception, comorbidities, and pre-existing pressure injuries. Positive consequences identified are increased patient comfort, increased staff satisfaction, decreased hospital-acquired pressure injuries, and increased adherence to established treatment protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This concept analysis may help to guide evidence-based practice for pressure injury screening in the emergency setting. Perhaps screening in the emergency department, if adopted globally, is the missing element needed to finally see a reduction in pressure injury rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":51525,"journal":{"name":"NURSING FORUM","volume":"57 6","pages":"1508-1512"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pressure injury screening in the emergency department: A concept analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Ogle,&nbsp;Mikel W Hand,&nbsp;Constance Swenty\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nuf.12806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This concept analysis analyzes pressure injury screening in the emergency department setting using Walker and Avant's approach.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure injury treatment cost in the United States totals over 11 billion dollars annually. Although a pressure injury could develop in the few hours a patient is in the emergency department, there is little guidance on how an emergency department should screen, prevent, and treat patients.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>Five sources resulted from database searches of CINAHL full-text, Health Business FullTEXT, and MEDLINE with Full Text. Key search terms used to narrow the search consist of the following terminology: \\\"pressure injury\\\" OR \\\"pressure ulcer\\\" AND \\\"screening\\\" AND \\\"risk factors\\\" AND \\\"emergency room\\\" OR \\\"emergency department.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Walker and Avant's method of concept analysis was used to clarify the concept of pressure injury screening in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The concept analysis identified two attributes of pressure injury screening in the emergency department: patient length of stay and the cost of pressure injury treatment. Antecedents identified are patient risk factors: age, mobility status, sensory perception, comorbidities, and pre-existing pressure injuries. Positive consequences identified are increased patient comfort, increased staff satisfaction, decreased hospital-acquired pressure injuries, and increased adherence to established treatment protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This concept analysis may help to guide evidence-based practice for pressure injury screening in the emergency setting. Perhaps screening in the emergency department, if adopted globally, is the missing element needed to finally see a reduction in pressure injury rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NURSING FORUM\",\"volume\":\"57 6\",\"pages\":\"1508-1512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NURSING FORUM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NURSING FORUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本概念分析分析在急诊科设置使用沃克和Avant的方法压力损伤筛查。背景:在美国,每年压伤治疗费用总计超过110亿美元。尽管病人在急诊科的几个小时内就可能出现压力性损伤,但关于急诊科应该如何筛查、预防和治疗病人的指导很少。数据来源:从CINAHL全文、Health Business全文和MEDLINE全文数据库检索得到5个来源。用于缩小搜索范围的关键搜索词包括以下术语:“压伤”或“压疮”和“筛查”和“危险因素”和“急诊室”或“急诊科”。回顾方法:采用Walker和Avant的概念分析法,厘清急诊科压力损伤筛查的概念。结果:概念分析确定了急诊科压力损伤筛查的两个属性:患者住院时间和压力损伤治疗费用。确定的前因是患者的危险因素:年龄、活动状况、感觉知觉、合并症和先前存在的压力损伤。确定的积极结果是增加了患者舒适度,提高了工作人员满意度,减少了医院获得性压力伤害,并提高了对既定治疗方案的依从性。结论:这一概念分析有助于指导急诊压力损伤筛查的循证实践。如果在全球范围内采用,也许急诊科的筛查是最终减少压力伤害率所需的缺失因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pressure injury screening in the emergency department: A concept analysis.

Aim: This concept analysis analyzes pressure injury screening in the emergency department setting using Walker and Avant's approach.

Background: Pressure injury treatment cost in the United States totals over 11 billion dollars annually. Although a pressure injury could develop in the few hours a patient is in the emergency department, there is little guidance on how an emergency department should screen, prevent, and treat patients.

Data source: Five sources resulted from database searches of CINAHL full-text, Health Business FullTEXT, and MEDLINE with Full Text. Key search terms used to narrow the search consist of the following terminology: "pressure injury" OR "pressure ulcer" AND "screening" AND "risk factors" AND "emergency room" OR "emergency department.

Review methods: Walker and Avant's method of concept analysis was used to clarify the concept of pressure injury screening in the emergency department.

Results: The concept analysis identified two attributes of pressure injury screening in the emergency department: patient length of stay and the cost of pressure injury treatment. Antecedents identified are patient risk factors: age, mobility status, sensory perception, comorbidities, and pre-existing pressure injuries. Positive consequences identified are increased patient comfort, increased staff satisfaction, decreased hospital-acquired pressure injuries, and increased adherence to established treatment protocols.

Conclusions: This concept analysis may help to guide evidence-based practice for pressure injury screening in the emergency setting. Perhaps screening in the emergency department, if adopted globally, is the missing element needed to finally see a reduction in pressure injury rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NURSING FORUM
NURSING FORUM NURSING-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Nursing Forum is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that invites original manuscripts that explore, explicate or report issues, ideas, trends and innovations that shape the nursing profession. Research manuscripts should emphasize the implications rather than the methods or analysis. Quality improvement manuscripts should emphasize the outcomes and follow the SQUIRE Guidelines in creating the manuscript. Evidence-based manuscripts should emphasize the findings and implications for practice and follow PICOT format. Concept analysis manuscripts should emphasize the evidence for support of the concept and follow an accepted format for such analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信