高血压和乳腺癌患者接受含阿霉素化疗时,各降压药类别的心血管预后差异

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Breast Cancer Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-09 DOI:10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e34
Hui-Jeong Hwang, Sang-Ah Han
{"title":"高血压和乳腺癌患者接受含阿霉素化疗时,各降压药类别的心血管预后差异","authors":"Hui-Jeong Hwang,&nbsp;Sang-Ah Han","doi":"10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The preemptive use of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors may reduce doxorubicin (DOX)-related cardiotoxicity. Using the national insurance claims data of Korea, this study compared cardiovascular (CV) outcomes following the use of four major antihypertensive drug classes in patients with hypertension and breast cancer who underwent DOX-containing chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 4,722 patients with hypertension and breast cancer who underwent DOX-containing chemotherapy were included. The outcomes were compared between patients who used RAS inhibitors, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), beta-blockers (BBs), and thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics (TDs). The primary outcome was a composite of incident heart failure and serious ventricular arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, ischemic heart disease, and stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the propensity score-matched population, there were no significant differences in the primary outcome between RAS inhibitor and CCB users; however, patients with diabetes who used CCBs had a worse primary outcome than those who used RAS inhibitors (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-3.51). BB and TD users had a worse primary outcome compared with RAS inhibitor (aHR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.30-2.71 in BB users and aHR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.37-4.75 in TD users) or CCB (aHR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.09-2.16 in BB users and aHR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.13-3.82 in TD users) users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RAS inhibitors are preferred for the treating hypertension and improving CV outcomes in patients with hypertension and breast cancer undergoing DOX-containing chemotherapy, particularly in patients with comorbid diabetes. However, CCBs are equivalent to RAS inhibitors and are more favorable than BBs and TDs in terms of improving CV outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"492-503"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625866/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Cardiovascular Outcomes of Each Antihypertensive Drug Class in Patients With Hypertension and Breast Cancer Undergoing Doxorubicin-Containing Chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Hui-Jeong Hwang,&nbsp;Sang-Ah Han\",\"doi\":\"10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The preemptive use of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors may reduce doxorubicin (DOX)-related cardiotoxicity. Using the national insurance claims data of Korea, this study compared cardiovascular (CV) outcomes following the use of four major antihypertensive drug classes in patients with hypertension and breast cancer who underwent DOX-containing chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 4,722 patients with hypertension and breast cancer who underwent DOX-containing chemotherapy were included. The outcomes were compared between patients who used RAS inhibitors, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), beta-blockers (BBs), and thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics (TDs). The primary outcome was a composite of incident heart failure and serious ventricular arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, ischemic heart disease, and stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the propensity score-matched population, there were no significant differences in the primary outcome between RAS inhibitor and CCB users; however, patients with diabetes who used CCBs had a worse primary outcome than those who used RAS inhibitors (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-3.51). BB and TD users had a worse primary outcome compared with RAS inhibitor (aHR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.30-2.71 in BB users and aHR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.37-4.75 in TD users) or CCB (aHR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.09-2.16 in BB users and aHR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.13-3.82 in TD users) users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RAS inhibitors are preferred for the treating hypertension and improving CV outcomes in patients with hypertension and breast cancer undergoing DOX-containing chemotherapy, particularly in patients with comorbid diabetes. However, CCBs are equivalent to RAS inhibitors and are more favorable than BBs and TDs in terms of improving CV outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Breast Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"492-503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625866/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Breast Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e34\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e34","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:优先使用肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)抑制剂可以减少阿霉素(DOX)相关的心脏毒性。利用韩国的国家保险索赔数据,本研究比较了接受含DOX化疗的高血压和癌症患者在使用四种主要抗高血压药物后的心血管(CV)结果。方法:纳入4722例接受含DOX化疗的高血压和癌症患者。比较了使用RAS抑制剂、钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs)、β受体阻滞剂(BB)、噻嗪类和噻嗪类利尿剂(TDs)的患者的疗效。主要结果是偶发性心力衰竭和严重室性心律失常的复合,包括室性心动过速和纤维性颤动、缺血性心脏病和中风。结果:在倾向评分匹配的人群中,RAS抑制剂和CCB使用者的主要结果没有显著差异;然而使用CCBs的糖尿病患者的主要转归比使用RAS抑制剂的患者更差(调整后的危险比[aHR],1.93;95%置信区间[CI],1.06-3.51)。BB和TD使用者的主要转归与RAS抑制剂(aHR,1.88;BB使用者的95%CI,1.30-2.71,aHR,2.55;TD使用者的95%可信区间,1.37-4.75)或CCB相比更差(aHR,1.54;BB用户的95%CI,1.09-2.16;TD用户的aHR,2.08;95%CI,1.13-3.82)用户。结论:RAS抑制剂对于接受含DOX化疗的高血压和乳腺癌症患者,尤其是合并糖尿病患者,是治疗高血压和改善CV结果的首选药物。然而,CCBs相当于RAS抑制剂,在改善CV结果方面比BBs和TDs更有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Differential Cardiovascular Outcomes of Each Antihypertensive Drug Class in Patients With Hypertension and Breast Cancer Undergoing Doxorubicin-Containing Chemotherapy.

Differential Cardiovascular Outcomes of Each Antihypertensive Drug Class in Patients With Hypertension and Breast Cancer Undergoing Doxorubicin-Containing Chemotherapy.

Differential Cardiovascular Outcomes of Each Antihypertensive Drug Class in Patients With Hypertension and Breast Cancer Undergoing Doxorubicin-Containing Chemotherapy.

Differential Cardiovascular Outcomes of Each Antihypertensive Drug Class in Patients With Hypertension and Breast Cancer Undergoing Doxorubicin-Containing Chemotherapy.

Purpose: The preemptive use of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors may reduce doxorubicin (DOX)-related cardiotoxicity. Using the national insurance claims data of Korea, this study compared cardiovascular (CV) outcomes following the use of four major antihypertensive drug classes in patients with hypertension and breast cancer who underwent DOX-containing chemotherapy.

Methods: A total of 4,722 patients with hypertension and breast cancer who underwent DOX-containing chemotherapy were included. The outcomes were compared between patients who used RAS inhibitors, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), beta-blockers (BBs), and thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics (TDs). The primary outcome was a composite of incident heart failure and serious ventricular arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, ischemic heart disease, and stroke.

Results: In the propensity score-matched population, there were no significant differences in the primary outcome between RAS inhibitor and CCB users; however, patients with diabetes who used CCBs had a worse primary outcome than those who used RAS inhibitors (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-3.51). BB and TD users had a worse primary outcome compared with RAS inhibitor (aHR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.30-2.71 in BB users and aHR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.37-4.75 in TD users) or CCB (aHR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.09-2.16 in BB users and aHR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.13-3.82 in TD users) users.

Conclusion: RAS inhibitors are preferred for the treating hypertension and improving CV outcomes in patients with hypertension and breast cancer undergoing DOX-containing chemotherapy, particularly in patients with comorbid diabetes. However, CCBs are equivalent to RAS inhibitors and are more favorable than BBs and TDs in terms of improving CV outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Breast Cancer
Journal of Breast Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Breast Cancer (abbreviated as ''J Breast Cancer'') is the official journal of the Korean Breast Cancer Society, which is issued quarterly in the last day of March, June, September, and December each year since 1998. All the contents of the Journal is available online at the official journal website (http://ejbc.kr) under open access policy. The journal aims to provide a forum for the academic communication between medical doctors, basic science researchers, and health care professionals to be interested in breast cancer. To get this aim, we publish original investigations, review articles, brief communications including case reports, editorial opinions on the topics of importance to breast cancer, and welcome new research findings and epidemiological studies, especially when they contain a regional data to grab the international reader''s interest. Although the journal is mainly dealing with the issues of breast cancer, rare cases among benign breast diseases or evidence-based scientifically written articles providing useful information for clinical practice can be published as well.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信