颈椎病的最佳手术治疗方法:系统回顾与网络元分析》。

Advanced Biomedical Research Pub Date : 2023-07-25 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/abr.abr_251_22
Afshin Almasi, Samira Jafari, Leila Solouki, Niloofar Darvishi
{"title":"颈椎病的最佳手术治疗方法:系统回顾与网络元分析》。","authors":"Afshin Almasi, Samira Jafari, Leila Solouki, Niloofar Darvishi","doi":"10.4103/abr.abr_251_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A case with an inflamed or damaged nerve root in the cervical spine is defined as cervical radiculopathy.The purpose of the current study is to recognize the most effective surgical procedures in cervical radiculopathy subjects. All related studies were taken using PubMed searching international databases, Scopus, ISI Web of Science (WoS), and Science direct with no limit of until November 20<sup>th</sup>, 2021. Finally, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, after reviewing all randomized controlled trial studies which had the related data the researchers were looking for, they conducted meta-analysis with the seven remaining studies including eight different treatments. Heterogeneity was evaluated by Cochran's Q and Higgins I<sup>2</sup> using R software for the network. In the results presented in this study, the neck disability index (NDI) changes as a result of taking cervical anterior discectomy without (ACD) and with fusion (ACDF) and ACD arthroplasty were -0.003, -1.659, and -1.656, respectively. According to the final diagram of the network, 11 comparisons were made in pairs. When each treatment group is compared with ACDF, it is shown that there was a significant mean effect among the patients who receive Mobi-C, Kineflx|C, and ADR, with mean differences of - 8.60 [CI 95% (- 12.75, - 4.45)], - 1.10 [CI 95% (- 5.22, 3.02)], and - 1.00 [CI 95% (- 7.18, 5.18)], respectively. The most effective surgical treatments for cervical radiculopathy were Mobi-c, Kineflx|C, and artificial disc replacement compared to ACDF treatment, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":7225,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Biomedical Research","volume":"12 ","pages":"191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/13/04/ABR-12-191.PMC10492624.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Afshin Almasi, Samira Jafari, Leila Solouki, Niloofar Darvishi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/abr.abr_251_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A case with an inflamed or damaged nerve root in the cervical spine is defined as cervical radiculopathy.The purpose of the current study is to recognize the most effective surgical procedures in cervical radiculopathy subjects. All related studies were taken using PubMed searching international databases, Scopus, ISI Web of Science (WoS), and Science direct with no limit of until November 20<sup>th</sup>, 2021. Finally, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, after reviewing all randomized controlled trial studies which had the related data the researchers were looking for, they conducted meta-analysis with the seven remaining studies including eight different treatments. Heterogeneity was evaluated by Cochran's Q and Higgins I<sup>2</sup> using R software for the network. In the results presented in this study, the neck disability index (NDI) changes as a result of taking cervical anterior discectomy without (ACD) and with fusion (ACDF) and ACD arthroplasty were -0.003, -1.659, and -1.656, respectively. According to the final diagram of the network, 11 comparisons were made in pairs. When each treatment group is compared with ACDF, it is shown that there was a significant mean effect among the patients who receive Mobi-C, Kineflx|C, and ADR, with mean differences of - 8.60 [CI 95% (- 12.75, - 4.45)], - 1.10 [CI 95% (- 5.22, 3.02)], and - 1.00 [CI 95% (- 7.18, 5.18)], respectively. The most effective surgical treatments for cervical radiculopathy were Mobi-c, Kineflx|C, and artificial disc replacement compared to ACDF treatment, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Biomedical Research\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/13/04/ABR-12-191.PMC10492624.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Biomedical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_251_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_251_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颈椎神经根发炎或受损的病例被定义为颈椎病。本研究的目的是了解颈椎病患者最有效的手术方法。所有相关研究均通过 PubMed 国际数据库、Scopus、ISI Web of Science (WoS) 和 Science direct 进行检索,检索期限不超过 2021 年 11 月 20 日。最后,根据纳入和排除标准,在审查了所有具有研究人员所需的相关数据的随机对照试验研究后,他们对剩余的七项研究(包括八种不同的治疗方法)进行了荟萃分析。研究人员使用 R 网络软件,通过 Cochran's Q 和 Higgins I2 对异质性进行了评估。在本研究的结果中,颈椎前路椎间盘切除术(ACD)和融合术(ACDF)以及ACD关节置换术导致的颈部残疾指数(NDI)变化分别为-0.003、-1.659和-1.656。根据最终的网络图,有 11 项比较是成对进行的。将各治疗组与 ACDF 进行比较,结果显示,接受 Mobi-C、Kineflx|C 和 ADR 治疗的患者的平均效应显著,平均差异分别为-8.60 [CI 95% (- 12.75, - 4.45)]、-1.10 [CI 95% (- 5.22, 3.02)]和-1.00 [CI 95% (- 7.18, 5.18)]。与ACDF治疗相比,最有效的颈椎病手术治疗方法分别是Mobi-c、Kineflx|C和人工椎间盘置换术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

A case with an inflamed or damaged nerve root in the cervical spine is defined as cervical radiculopathy.The purpose of the current study is to recognize the most effective surgical procedures in cervical radiculopathy subjects. All related studies were taken using PubMed searching international databases, Scopus, ISI Web of Science (WoS), and Science direct with no limit of until November 20th, 2021. Finally, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, after reviewing all randomized controlled trial studies which had the related data the researchers were looking for, they conducted meta-analysis with the seven remaining studies including eight different treatments. Heterogeneity was evaluated by Cochran's Q and Higgins I2 using R software for the network. In the results presented in this study, the neck disability index (NDI) changes as a result of taking cervical anterior discectomy without (ACD) and with fusion (ACDF) and ACD arthroplasty were -0.003, -1.659, and -1.656, respectively. According to the final diagram of the network, 11 comparisons were made in pairs. When each treatment group is compared with ACDF, it is shown that there was a significant mean effect among the patients who receive Mobi-C, Kineflx|C, and ADR, with mean differences of - 8.60 [CI 95% (- 12.75, - 4.45)], - 1.10 [CI 95% (- 5.22, 3.02)], and - 1.00 [CI 95% (- 7.18, 5.18)], respectively. The most effective surgical treatments for cervical radiculopathy were Mobi-c, Kineflx|C, and artificial disc replacement compared to ACDF treatment, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信