家庭护理人员想要什么?提供护理的报酬。

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Aging & Social Policy Pub Date : 2024-07-03 Epub Date: 2023-01-23 DOI:10.1080/08959420.2022.2127599
Pamela Nadash, Eileen J Tell, Taylor Jansen
{"title":"家庭护理人员想要什么?提供护理的报酬。","authors":"Pamela Nadash, Eileen J Tell, Taylor Jansen","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2022.2127599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the primary goal of self-directed programs providing long term services and supports (LTSS) is to maximize choice and control for service recipients, such programs may also benefit family caregivers by compensating them for providing supportive services. This study draws on qualitative data from research supporting the RAISE Family Caregiver Advisory Council, finding that family caregivers themselves see the expansion of self-directed programs as a policy priority due to their need for financial security. The request for compensation was the strongest finding, with respondents highlighting the incompatibility of work with caregiving and their inability to rely on the existing paid workforce due to supply and quality issues; the consequences of this loss of earned income were reported as severe. Ultimately, respondents saw payment for providing care as an issue of fairness. This evidence supports the policy case for expanding access to self-directed programs that permit the employment of family caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":"547-561"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What do Family Caregivers Want? Payment for Providing Care.\",\"authors\":\"Pamela Nadash, Eileen J Tell, Taylor Jansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08959420.2022.2127599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although the primary goal of self-directed programs providing long term services and supports (LTSS) is to maximize choice and control for service recipients, such programs may also benefit family caregivers by compensating them for providing supportive services. This study draws on qualitative data from research supporting the RAISE Family Caregiver Advisory Council, finding that family caregivers themselves see the expansion of self-directed programs as a policy priority due to their need for financial security. The request for compensation was the strongest finding, with respondents highlighting the incompatibility of work with caregiving and their inability to rely on the existing paid workforce due to supply and quality issues; the consequences of this loss of earned income were reported as severe. Ultimately, respondents saw payment for providing care as an issue of fairness. This evidence supports the policy case for expanding access to self-directed programs that permit the employment of family caregivers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging & Social Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"547-561\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging & Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2022.2127599\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2022.2127599","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管提供长期服务和支持(LTSS)的自主计划的主要目标是最大限度地增加服务接受者的选择权和控制权,但此类计划也可以通过补偿提供支持性服务的家庭照顾者而使其受益。本研究借鉴了支持 RAISE 家庭照顾者咨询委员会研究的定性数据,发现由于家庭照顾者需要经济保障,他们自己将扩大自主计划视为政策优先事项。对补偿的要求是最强烈的发现,受访者强调了工作与照护的不兼容性,以及由于供应和质量问题,他们无法依靠现有的有偿劳动力;据报告,这种收入损失的后果是严重的。最终,受访者认为提供护理的报酬是一个公平问题。这些证据证明,在政策上有理由扩大允许家庭照顾者就业的自主计划的使用范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What do Family Caregivers Want? Payment for Providing Care.

Although the primary goal of self-directed programs providing long term services and supports (LTSS) is to maximize choice and control for service recipients, such programs may also benefit family caregivers by compensating them for providing supportive services. This study draws on qualitative data from research supporting the RAISE Family Caregiver Advisory Council, finding that family caregivers themselves see the expansion of self-directed programs as a policy priority due to their need for financial security. The request for compensation was the strongest finding, with respondents highlighting the incompatibility of work with caregiving and their inability to rely on the existing paid workforce due to supply and quality issues; the consequences of this loss of earned income were reported as severe. Ultimately, respondents saw payment for providing care as an issue of fairness. This evidence supports the policy case for expanding access to self-directed programs that permit the employment of family caregivers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim. The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信