Eric Lee, Alyssa Moy, Trung Nguyen, Richard Kao, Guo-Hao Lin
{"title":"骨形态发生蛋白-2(BMP-2)对动物模型中种植体周围缺损体积和组织测量结果的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Eric Lee, Alyssa Moy, Trung Nguyen, Richard Kao, Guo-Hao Lin","doi":"10.11607/jomi.10027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To study the effect of BMP-2 on the volumetric and histometric changes in peri-implant defect treatments in animal models. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> An electronic search of four databases and a manual search of peer-reviewed journals for relevant articles were performed. Animal studies with data that compared the volumetric and/or histometric outcomes of peri-implant defect treatment with and without the use of BMP-2 were included. Meta-analyses were performed to analyze the weighted mean difference (WMD) and confidence interval (CI) for the recorded variables. <b>Results:</b> After completing the search process, 21 randomized controlled trials were included. The results of the meta-analyses showed that the WMD of bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) with 4 to 8 weeks and 12 to 24 weeks of follow-up was 15.50% (95% CI = 3.28% to 27.72%, <i>P</i> = .01) and 16.17% (95% CI = 11.17% to 21.16%, <i>P</i> < .00001), respectively, favoring the BMP-2 group. The WMD for the percentage of defect fill with 4 to 8 weeks and 12 to 24 weeks of follow-up was 15.88% (95% CI = 3.90% to 27.86%, <i>P</i> = .009) and 10.48% (95% CI = 0.95% to 20.02%, <i>P</i> = .03), respectively, favoring the BMP-2 group. The WMD for the vertical bone gain with 8 to 16 weeks of follow-up was 1.63 mm (95% CI = 0.58 to 2.67 mm, <i>P</i> = .002), also favoring the BMP-2 group. <b>Conclusion:</b> This review demonstrated that the use of BMP-2 in treating peri-implant defects showed better clinical and histometric outcomes than defects not treated with BMP-2 in animal models.</p>","PeriodicalId":50298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","volume":"38 4","pages":"651-666"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (BMP-2) on Volumetric and Histometric Outcomes for Peri-Implant Defects in the Animal Model: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Lee, Alyssa Moy, Trung Nguyen, Richard Kao, Guo-Hao Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/jomi.10027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To study the effect of BMP-2 on the volumetric and histometric changes in peri-implant defect treatments in animal models. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> An electronic search of four databases and a manual search of peer-reviewed journals for relevant articles were performed. Animal studies with data that compared the volumetric and/or histometric outcomes of peri-implant defect treatment with and without the use of BMP-2 were included. Meta-analyses were performed to analyze the weighted mean difference (WMD) and confidence interval (CI) for the recorded variables. <b>Results:</b> After completing the search process, 21 randomized controlled trials were included. The results of the meta-analyses showed that the WMD of bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) with 4 to 8 weeks and 12 to 24 weeks of follow-up was 15.50% (95% CI = 3.28% to 27.72%, <i>P</i> = .01) and 16.17% (95% CI = 11.17% to 21.16%, <i>P</i> < .00001), respectively, favoring the BMP-2 group. The WMD for the percentage of defect fill with 4 to 8 weeks and 12 to 24 weeks of follow-up was 15.88% (95% CI = 3.90% to 27.86%, <i>P</i> = .009) and 10.48% (95% CI = 0.95% to 20.02%, <i>P</i> = .03), respectively, favoring the BMP-2 group. The WMD for the vertical bone gain with 8 to 16 weeks of follow-up was 1.63 mm (95% CI = 0.58 to 2.67 mm, <i>P</i> = .002), also favoring the BMP-2 group. <b>Conclusion:</b> This review demonstrated that the use of BMP-2 in treating peri-implant defects showed better clinical and histometric outcomes than defects not treated with BMP-2 in animal models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"651-666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effect of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (BMP-2) on Volumetric and Histometric Outcomes for Peri-Implant Defects in the Animal Model: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Purpose: To study the effect of BMP-2 on the volumetric and histometric changes in peri-implant defect treatments in animal models. Materials and Methods: An electronic search of four databases and a manual search of peer-reviewed journals for relevant articles were performed. Animal studies with data that compared the volumetric and/or histometric outcomes of peri-implant defect treatment with and without the use of BMP-2 were included. Meta-analyses were performed to analyze the weighted mean difference (WMD) and confidence interval (CI) for the recorded variables. Results: After completing the search process, 21 randomized controlled trials were included. The results of the meta-analyses showed that the WMD of bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) with 4 to 8 weeks and 12 to 24 weeks of follow-up was 15.50% (95% CI = 3.28% to 27.72%, P = .01) and 16.17% (95% CI = 11.17% to 21.16%, P < .00001), respectively, favoring the BMP-2 group. The WMD for the percentage of defect fill with 4 to 8 weeks and 12 to 24 weeks of follow-up was 15.88% (95% CI = 3.90% to 27.86%, P = .009) and 10.48% (95% CI = 0.95% to 20.02%, P = .03), respectively, favoring the BMP-2 group. The WMD for the vertical bone gain with 8 to 16 weeks of follow-up was 1.63 mm (95% CI = 0.58 to 2.67 mm, P = .002), also favoring the BMP-2 group. Conclusion: This review demonstrated that the use of BMP-2 in treating peri-implant defects showed better clinical and histometric outcomes than defects not treated with BMP-2 in animal models.
期刊介绍:
Edited by Steven E. Eckert, DDS, MS ISSN (Print): 0882-2786
ISSN (Online): 1942-4434
This highly regarded, often-cited journal integrates clinical and scientific data to improve methods and results of oral and maxillofacial implant therapy. It presents pioneering research, technology, clinical applications, reviews of the literature, seminal studies, emerging technology, position papers, and consensus studies, as well as the many clinical and therapeutic innovations that ensue as a result of these efforts. The editorial board is composed of recognized opinion leaders in their respective areas of expertise and reflects the international reach of the journal. Under their leadership, JOMI maintains its strong scientific integrity while expanding its influence within the field of implant dentistry. JOMI’s popular regular feature "Thematic Abstract Review" presents a review of abstracts of recently published articles on a specific topical area of interest each issue.