{"title":"非小细胞肺癌患者的胸部分期：关于[18F]FDG PET/MRI和[18F]FDG PET/CT诊断准确性的系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Batool Shahraki Mojahed, Khadije Saravani, Fateme Parooie","doi":"10.5603/NMR.a2022.0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/MR versus [18F]FDG PET/CT in the thoracic staging of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) were followed in conducting the present study. All available research was collected through Embase (Elsevier), PubMed, as well as Cochrane Library databases up to June 2021. Only studies covering both [18F]FDG PET/MRI and [18F]FDG PET/CT techniques in the same group were included. Statistical analysis was done using Stata v.12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/CT in T and N staging was 92% (95% CI: 89-95 , I2 : 93.4%) and 78% (95% CI: 74-82 , I2 : 98.5%) respectively. While, the corresponding rates for [18F]FDG PET/MRI were 91% (95% CI: 88-94 , I2 : 96.5%) and 89% (95% CI: 84-94 , I2 : 88.1%) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present meta-analysis showed that [18F]FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI exhibit relatively the same performance in detecting N and T stages in patients with NSCLC. Thus, [18F]FDG PET/MRI can be a worthy alternative for [18F]FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of advanced of NSCLC in the chest area, more specifically in N-staging, since it provides higher soft-tissue contrast. There is a need for more reliable research for comparing the diagnostic performance of these imaging techniques and various optimized [18F]FDG PET/MRI protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":44718,"journal":{"name":"NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoracic staging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis on diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/MRI and [18F]FDG PET/CT.\",\"authors\":\"Batool Shahraki Mojahed, Khadije Saravani, Fateme Parooie\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/NMR.a2022.0037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/MR versus [18F]FDG PET/CT in the thoracic staging of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) were followed in conducting the present study. All available research was collected through Embase (Elsevier), PubMed, as well as Cochrane Library databases up to June 2021. Only studies covering both [18F]FDG PET/MRI and [18F]FDG PET/CT techniques in the same group were included. Statistical analysis was done using Stata v.12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/CT in T and N staging was 92% (95% CI: 89-95 , I2 : 93.4%) and 78% (95% CI: 74-82 , I2 : 98.5%) respectively. While, the corresponding rates for [18F]FDG PET/MRI were 91% (95% CI: 88-94 , I2 : 96.5%) and 89% (95% CI: 84-94 , I2 : 88.1%) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present meta-analysis showed that [18F]FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI exhibit relatively the same performance in detecting N and T stages in patients with NSCLC. Thus, [18F]FDG PET/MRI can be a worthy alternative for [18F]FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of advanced of NSCLC in the chest area, more specifically in N-staging, since it provides higher soft-tissue contrast. There is a need for more reliable research for comparing the diagnostic performance of these imaging techniques and various optimized [18F]FDG PET/MRI protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/NMR.a2022.0037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/NMR.a2022.0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Thoracic staging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis on diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/MRI and [18F]FDG PET/CT.
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/MR versus [18F]FDG PET/CT in the thoracic staging of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLS).
Material and methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) were followed in conducting the present study. All available research was collected through Embase (Elsevier), PubMed, as well as Cochrane Library databases up to June 2021. Only studies covering both [18F]FDG PET/MRI and [18F]FDG PET/CT techniques in the same group were included. Statistical analysis was done using Stata v.12.
Results: The overall accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/CT in T and N staging was 92% (95% CI: 89-95 , I2 : 93.4%) and 78% (95% CI: 74-82 , I2 : 98.5%) respectively. While, the corresponding rates for [18F]FDG PET/MRI were 91% (95% CI: 88-94 , I2 : 96.5%) and 89% (95% CI: 84-94 , I2 : 88.1%) respectively.
Conclusions: The present meta-analysis showed that [18F]FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI exhibit relatively the same performance in detecting N and T stages in patients with NSCLC. Thus, [18F]FDG PET/MRI can be a worthy alternative for [18F]FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of advanced of NSCLC in the chest area, more specifically in N-staging, since it provides higher soft-tissue contrast. There is a need for more reliable research for comparing the diagnostic performance of these imaging techniques and various optimized [18F]FDG PET/MRI protocols.
期刊介绍：
Written in English, NMR is a biannual international periodical of scientific and educational profile. It is a journal of Bulgarian, Czech, Hungarian, Macedonian, Polish, Romanian, Russian, Slovak, Ukrainian and Yugoslav Societies of Nuclear Medicine. The periodical focuses on all nuclear medicine topics (diagnostics as well as therapy), and presents original experimental scientific papers, reviews, case studies, letters also news about symposia and congresses. NMR is indexed at Index Copernicus (7.41), Scopus, EMBASE, Index Medicus/Medline, Ministry of Education 2007 (4 pts.).
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
