在主要修复学期刊上发表的临床研究的证据水平和特点。

IF 4.3 2区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.12.008

Merve Koseoglu DDS , Berkman Albayrak DDS , Hubban Nasution DDS, MSc , Judy Chia-Chun Yuan DDS, MS, MAS , Foteini Touloumi DDS, MDSc , Jiyeon J. Kim DMD, MS, MBA , Funda Bayindir DDS, PhD , Cortino Sukotjo DDS, PhD, MSc

{"title":"在主要修复学期刊上发表的临床研究的证据水平和特点。","authors":"Merve Koseoglu DDS , Berkman Albayrak DDS , Hubban Nasution DDS, MSc , Judy Chia-Chun Yuan DDS, MS, MAS , Foteini Touloumi DDS, MDSc , Jiyeon J. Kim DMD, MS, MBA , Funda Bayindir DDS, PhD , Cortino Sukotjo DDS, PhD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>Data on the level of evidence and the characteristics of studies published in peer-reviewed prosthodontic journals are lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics and level of evidence (LOE) scores of studies published in 3 leading peer-reviewed prosthodontic journals.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Clinical studies published in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (JPD), the Journal of Prosthodontics (JP), and the International Journal of Prosthodontics (IJP) in 2013 and 2020 were included in the analysis. Abstracts, letters to the editor, book reviews, and animal and laboratory studies were excluded from the investigation. For each study, design, type and LOE scores (Levels 1 to 5), publication year, impact factor (IF) of the journals, geographic origins of the first and corresponding authors, and funding status were recorded. Level 1 and Level 2 were defined as high evidence (HE), and Level 3, Level 4, and Level 5 were defined as low evidence (LE). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were performed (α=.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>Among the 439 studies included in the analysis, the proportion of HE and LE studies was 14.1% and 85.9%, respectively. According to univariate and multivariate analysis results, year of publication (</span><em>P</em>=.010 and <em>P</em>=.029), geographic origin of the corresponding author (<em>P</em><.001), and funding status (<em>P</em><.001 and <em>P</em>=.002) were significantly associated with the LOE of a study. However, the journal IF was not associated with LOE (<em>P</em>=.328).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although the number of HE studies in 3 leading prosthodontic journals has increased over time, the total number was still limited compared with LE studies. A further improvement in the overall LOE of clinical studies in prosthodontics is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"132 5","pages":"Pages 939-946"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Level of evidence and characteristics of clinical studies published in leading prosthodontics journals\",\"authors\":\"Merve Koseoglu DDS , Berkman Albayrak DDS , Hubban Nasution DDS, MSc , Judy Chia-Chun Yuan DDS, MS, MAS , Foteini Touloumi DDS, MDSc , Jiyeon J. Kim DMD, MS, MBA , Funda Bayindir DDS, PhD , Cortino Sukotjo DDS, PhD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.12.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>Data on the level of evidence and the characteristics of studies published in peer-reviewed prosthodontic journals are lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics and level of evidence (LOE) scores of studies published in 3 leading peer-reviewed prosthodontic journals.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Clinical studies published in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (JPD), the Journal of Prosthodontics (JP), and the International Journal of Prosthodontics (IJP) in 2013 and 2020 were included in the analysis. Abstracts, letters to the editor, book reviews, and animal and laboratory studies were excluded from the investigation. For each study, design, type and LOE scores (Levels 1 to 5), publication year, impact factor (IF) of the journals, geographic origins of the first and corresponding authors, and funding status were recorded. Level 1 and Level 2 were defined as high evidence (HE), and Level 3, Level 4, and Level 5 were defined as low evidence (LE). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were performed (α=.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>Among the 439 studies included in the analysis, the proportion of HE and LE studies was 14.1% and 85.9%, respectively. According to univariate and multivariate analysis results, year of publication (</span><em>P</em>=.010 and <em>P</em>=.029), geographic origin of the corresponding author (<em>P</em><.001), and funding status (<em>P</em><.001 and <em>P</em>=.002) were significantly associated with the LOE of a study. However, the journal IF was not associated with LOE (<em>P</em>=.328).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although the number of HE studies in 3 leading prosthodontic journals has increased over time, the total number was still limited compared with LE studies. A further improvement in the overall LOE of clinical studies in prosthodontics is needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"132 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 939-946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002239132200796X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002239132200796X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：本研究的目的是调查3种主要的同行评审修复学期刊上发表的研究的特征和证据水平（LOE）评分：分析对象包括2013年至2020年发表在《口腔修复学杂志》（JPD）、《口腔修复学杂志》（JP）和《国际口腔修复学杂志》（IJP）上的临床研究。摘要、致编辑的信、书评以及动物和实验室研究不在调查范围之内。每项研究的设计、类型和 LOE 评分（1 至 5 级）、发表年份、期刊影响因子 (IF)、第一作者和通讯作者的籍贯以及经费状况均有记录。1级和2级被定义为高证据（HE），3级、4级和5级被定义为低证据（LE）。进行了描述性统计和逻辑回归分析（α=.05）：在纳入分析的 439 项研究中，HE 和 LE 研究的比例分别为 14.1%和 85.9%。根据单变量和多变量分析结果，发表年份（P=.010 和 P=.029）、相应作者的地域来源（PConclusions：尽管随着时间的推移，3种主要口腔修复学期刊上的HE研究数量有所增加，但与LE研究相比，总数量仍然有限。需要进一步提高口腔修复学临床研究的整体 LOE。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Level of evidence and characteristics of clinical studies published in leading prosthodontics journals

Statement of problem

Data on the level of evidence and the characteristics of studies published in peer-reviewed prosthodontic journals are lacking.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics and level of evidence (LOE) scores of studies published in 3 leading peer-reviewed prosthodontic journals.

Material and methods

Clinical studies published in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (JPD), the Journal of Prosthodontics (JP), and the International Journal of Prosthodontics (IJP) in 2013 and 2020 were included in the analysis. Abstracts, letters to the editor, book reviews, and animal and laboratory studies were excluded from the investigation. For each study, design, type and LOE scores (Levels 1 to 5), publication year, impact factor (IF) of the journals, geographic origins of the first and corresponding authors, and funding status were recorded. Level 1 and Level 2 were defined as high evidence (HE), and Level 3, Level 4, and Level 5 were defined as low evidence (LE). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were performed (α=.05).

Results

Among the 439 studies included in the analysis, the proportion of HE and LE studies was 14.1% and 85.9%, respectively. According to univariate and multivariate analysis results, year of publication (P=.010 and P=.029), geographic origin of the corresponding author (P<.001), and funding status (P<.001 and P=.002) were significantly associated with the LOE of a study. However, the journal IF was not associated with LOE (P=.328).

Conclusions

Although the number of HE studies in 3 leading prosthodontic journals has increased over time, the total number was still limited compared with LE studies. A further improvement in the overall LOE of clinical studies in prosthodontics is needed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

7.00

自引率

13.00%

发文量

599

审稿时长

69 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.