[精益六西格玛在自动配药系统的实施:提高胸外科药物的安全使用]

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica Pub Date : 2022-04-12
Siria Pablos Bravo, José Manuel Caro Teller, Candelas López-López, Ana María Carro Ruiz, Ana María Guede González, José Miguel Ferrari Piquero
{"title":"[精益六西格玛在自动配药系统的实施:提高胸外科药物的安全使用]","authors":"Siria Pablos Bravo,&nbsp;José Manuel Caro Teller,&nbsp;Candelas López-López,&nbsp;Ana María Carro Ruiz,&nbsp;Ana María Guede González,&nbsp;José Miguel Ferrari Piquero","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Medications errors are a major problem that can cause a harm to inpatients. The main objective of the study was to compared medication errors in pharmacotherapeutic process before and after to carried out an intervention: to implant an automated dispensing cabine with to use Lean Six Sigma methodology. The secondary objective was to assess process performance, sigma level and defects per one million opportunities for medication error.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Quasi-experimental and randomized study carried out in a Thoracic Surgery Unit of a Spanish Hospital. A pharmaceutic recorded and assesed the medication errors detected during pre-intervention period (july-august 2017) and post-intervention period (march-april 2018). The steps analyzed were dispensing, storage and compounding/administration. The pharmacist observed a third of the medication dispensed, stored and compounded/administered during the study period. The observed medication was randomly selected using AleatorMetod.xls software. To perform the statistical analysis, Student's t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare quantitative variables, and Chi-square test for qualitative variables. A significance level of p<0.05 was considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pharmaceutic recorded 4,538 drugs. After intervention, medication errors were decreased a 49% in total pharmacotherapeutic process (12.06% vs 6.15%; p<0.001). In addition, errors were decreased a 91.6% (4.27% vs 0.36%; p=0.004) in the step of medication storage; and a 75.8% (22.52% vs 5.46%; p<0.001) in the step of drugs compounding/administration. However, medication errors were increased in the step of medication dispensing (4.51% vs 15.29%; p<0.001). The process performance increased a 6% (87.9% vs 93.9%), sigma level increased from 2.67 to 3.04 and defects per one million opportunities for medication error decreased a 49%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To implant an automated dispensing cabinet with Lean Six Sigma methodology helps create a safer environment for the inpatient, reducing medication errors in the steps of storage and preparation/administration, as well as improving the total process performance and sigma level.</p>","PeriodicalId":47152,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","volume":"96 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Lean Six Sigma in the implementation of automated dispensing systems: improving the safe use of medications in thoracic surgery.]\",\"authors\":\"Siria Pablos Bravo,&nbsp;José Manuel Caro Teller,&nbsp;Candelas López-López,&nbsp;Ana María Carro Ruiz,&nbsp;Ana María Guede González,&nbsp;José Miguel Ferrari Piquero\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Medications errors are a major problem that can cause a harm to inpatients. The main objective of the study was to compared medication errors in pharmacotherapeutic process before and after to carried out an intervention: to implant an automated dispensing cabine with to use Lean Six Sigma methodology. The secondary objective was to assess process performance, sigma level and defects per one million opportunities for medication error.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Quasi-experimental and randomized study carried out in a Thoracic Surgery Unit of a Spanish Hospital. A pharmaceutic recorded and assesed the medication errors detected during pre-intervention period (july-august 2017) and post-intervention period (march-april 2018). The steps analyzed were dispensing, storage and compounding/administration. The pharmacist observed a third of the medication dispensed, stored and compounded/administered during the study period. The observed medication was randomly selected using AleatorMetod.xls software. To perform the statistical analysis, Student's t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare quantitative variables, and Chi-square test for qualitative variables. A significance level of p<0.05 was considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pharmaceutic recorded 4,538 drugs. After intervention, medication errors were decreased a 49% in total pharmacotherapeutic process (12.06% vs 6.15%; p<0.001). In addition, errors were decreased a 91.6% (4.27% vs 0.36%; p=0.004) in the step of medication storage; and a 75.8% (22.52% vs 5.46%; p<0.001) in the step of drugs compounding/administration. However, medication errors were increased in the step of medication dispensing (4.51% vs 15.29%; p<0.001). The process performance increased a 6% (87.9% vs 93.9%), sigma level increased from 2.67 to 3.04 and defects per one million opportunities for medication error decreased a 49%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To implant an automated dispensing cabinet with Lean Six Sigma methodology helps create a safer environment for the inpatient, reducing medication errors in the steps of storage and preparation/administration, as well as improving the total process performance and sigma level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:用药差错是对住院患者造成伤害的主要问题之一。本研究的主要目的是比较药物治疗过程中的用药错误,在进行干预之前和之后:植入自动配药柜,使用精益六西格玛方法。次要目标是评估过程性能、西格玛水平和每百万分之一次用药错误机会的缺陷。方法:在西班牙某医院胸外科进行准实验和随机研究。A药房记录并评估了干预前(2017年7月- 8月)和干预后(2018年3月- 4月)发现的用药错误。分析的步骤是配药、储存和配药/给药。药剂师在研究期间观察了三分之一的药物分配、储存和配制/施用。采用aleatormethod .xls软件随机抽取观察用药。进行统计分析时,定量变量比较采用Student’st检验和Mann-Whitney U检验,定性变量比较采用卡方检验。结果具有显著性水平:共记录药品4538种。干预后,整个药物治疗过程中的用药错误减少了49% (12.06% vs 6.15%;结论:采用精益六西格玛方法植入自动配药柜有助于为住院患者创造更安全的环境,减少储存和制备/给药环节的用药错误,提高整个过程的绩效和西格玛水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Lean Six Sigma in the implementation of automated dispensing systems: improving the safe use of medications in thoracic surgery.]

Objective: Medications errors are a major problem that can cause a harm to inpatients. The main objective of the study was to compared medication errors in pharmacotherapeutic process before and after to carried out an intervention: to implant an automated dispensing cabine with to use Lean Six Sigma methodology. The secondary objective was to assess process performance, sigma level and defects per one million opportunities for medication error.

Methods: Quasi-experimental and randomized study carried out in a Thoracic Surgery Unit of a Spanish Hospital. A pharmaceutic recorded and assesed the medication errors detected during pre-intervention period (july-august 2017) and post-intervention period (march-april 2018). The steps analyzed were dispensing, storage and compounding/administration. The pharmacist observed a third of the medication dispensed, stored and compounded/administered during the study period. The observed medication was randomly selected using AleatorMetod.xls software. To perform the statistical analysis, Student's t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare quantitative variables, and Chi-square test for qualitative variables. A significance level of p<0.05 was considered.

Results: The pharmaceutic recorded 4,538 drugs. After intervention, medication errors were decreased a 49% in total pharmacotherapeutic process (12.06% vs 6.15%; p<0.001). In addition, errors were decreased a 91.6% (4.27% vs 0.36%; p=0.004) in the step of medication storage; and a 75.8% (22.52% vs 5.46%; p<0.001) in the step of drugs compounding/administration. However, medication errors were increased in the step of medication dispensing (4.51% vs 15.29%; p<0.001). The process performance increased a 6% (87.9% vs 93.9%), sigma level increased from 2.67 to 3.04 and defects per one million opportunities for medication error decreased a 49%.

Conclusions: To implant an automated dispensing cabinet with Lean Six Sigma methodology helps create a safer environment for the inpatient, reducing medication errors in the steps of storage and preparation/administration, as well as improving the total process performance and sigma level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信