死亡焦虑信念与行为量表的编制与验证

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Rachel E. Menzies, Louise Sharpe, Ilan Dar-Nimrod
{"title":"死亡焦虑信念与行为量表的编制与验证","authors":"Rachel E. Menzies,&nbsp;Louise Sharpe,&nbsp;Ilan Dar-Nimrod","doi":"10.1111/bjc.12387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Research spanning the fields of clinical, social and health psychology suggests that death anxiety is an important construct. However, no comprehensive, psychometrically adequate measure of the construct exists. The current studies outline the development of a new measure of death anxiety, the Death Anxiety Beliefs and Behaviours Scale (DABBS), which is the first measure to specifically assess unhelpful beliefs and behaviours that may underlie fears of death.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In Study 1, items were piloted in a large community sample (<i>N</i> = 505). In Studies 2A and 2B, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed using a treatment-seeking (<i>N</i> = 200) and non-treatment-seeking sample (<i>N</i> = 200). These analyses resulted in the final 18-item scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The DABBS demonstrated good construct validity, criterion validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability. In Study 3, the DABBS effectively distinguished participants with clinically significant death anxiety and distress from those without, demonstrating excellent discriminant validity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The present data indicate that the DABBS is a valid and reliable measure of affect, beliefs and behaviours relating to death anxiety, in a community sample of adults and among those seeking mental health treatment. Given the increasing recognition of the importance of death anxiety, the DABBS offers a useful research and clinical tool.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"61 4","pages":"1169-1187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjc.12387","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The development and validation of the Death Anxiety Beliefs and Behaviours Scale\",\"authors\":\"Rachel E. Menzies,&nbsp;Louise Sharpe,&nbsp;Ilan Dar-Nimrod\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjc.12387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Research spanning the fields of clinical, social and health psychology suggests that death anxiety is an important construct. However, no comprehensive, psychometrically adequate measure of the construct exists. The current studies outline the development of a new measure of death anxiety, the Death Anxiety Beliefs and Behaviours Scale (DABBS), which is the first measure to specifically assess unhelpful beliefs and behaviours that may underlie fears of death.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In Study 1, items were piloted in a large community sample (<i>N</i> = 505). In Studies 2A and 2B, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed using a treatment-seeking (<i>N</i> = 200) and non-treatment-seeking sample (<i>N</i> = 200). These analyses resulted in the final 18-item scale.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The DABBS demonstrated good construct validity, criterion validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability. In Study 3, the DABBS effectively distinguished participants with clinically significant death anxiety and distress from those without, demonstrating excellent discriminant validity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The present data indicate that the DABBS is a valid and reliable measure of affect, beliefs and behaviours relating to death anxiety, in a community sample of adults and among those seeking mental health treatment. Given the increasing recognition of the importance of death anxiety, the DABBS offers a useful research and clinical tool.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"61 4\",\"pages\":\"1169-1187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjc.12387\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjc.12387\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjc.12387","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的临床、社会和健康心理学领域的研究表明,死亡焦虑是一种重要的建构。然而,没有全面的,心理测量学上适当的结构测量存在。目前的研究概述了一种新的死亡焦虑测量方法的发展,死亡焦虑信念和行为量表(DABBS),这是第一个专门评估可能导致死亡恐惧的无益信念和行为的测量方法。方法在研究1中,在一个大的社区样本(N = 505)中进行项目试点。在研究2A和2B中,采用寻求治疗(N = 200)和非寻求治疗的样本(N = 200)进行探索性和验证性因素分析。这些分析产生了最终的18项量表。结果DABBS具有良好的结构效度、效标效度、内部一致性和重测信度。在研究3中,DABBS有效地区分了有临床意义的死亡焦虑和痛苦的参与者和没有临床意义的参与者,显示出极好的区分效度。结论:目前的数据表明,在社区成人样本和寻求心理健康治疗的人群中,DABBS是与死亡焦虑相关的情感、信念和行为的有效和可靠的测量方法。鉴于人们越来越认识到死亡焦虑的重要性,DABBS提供了一个有用的研究和临床工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The development and validation of the Death Anxiety Beliefs and Behaviours Scale

Objectives

Research spanning the fields of clinical, social and health psychology suggests that death anxiety is an important construct. However, no comprehensive, psychometrically adequate measure of the construct exists. The current studies outline the development of a new measure of death anxiety, the Death Anxiety Beliefs and Behaviours Scale (DABBS), which is the first measure to specifically assess unhelpful beliefs and behaviours that may underlie fears of death.

Methods

In Study 1, items were piloted in a large community sample (N = 505). In Studies 2A and 2B, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed using a treatment-seeking (N = 200) and non-treatment-seeking sample (N = 200). These analyses resulted in the final 18-item scale.

Results

The DABBS demonstrated good construct validity, criterion validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability. In Study 3, the DABBS effectively distinguished participants with clinically significant death anxiety and distress from those without, demonstrating excellent discriminant validity.

Conclusions

The present data indicate that the DABBS is a valid and reliable measure of affect, beliefs and behaviours relating to death anxiety, in a community sample of adults and among those seeking mental health treatment. Given the increasing recognition of the importance of death anxiety, the DABBS offers a useful research and clinical tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信