保守党和自由党幸福差距的纵向测试。

IF 3.4 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-07 DOI:10.1177/01461672221096587

Salvador Vargas Salfate, Sammyh S Khan, James H Liu, Homero Gil de Zúñiga

{"title":"保守党和自由党幸福差距的纵向测试。","authors":"Salvador Vargas Salfate, Sammyh S Khan, James H Liu, Homero Gil de Zúñiga","doi":"10.1177/01461672221096587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we test if conservatism predicts psychological well-being longitudinally. We based the study on previous findings showing that conservatives score higher on different measures of well-being, such as life satisfaction and happiness. Most explanations in the literature have assumed that conservatism antecedes well-being without considering the alternative—that well-being may predict conservatism. In Study 1, using multilevel cross-lagged panel models with a two-wave longitudinal sample consisting of data from 19 countries (N = 8,740), we found that conservatism did not predict well-being over time. We found similar results in Study 2 (N = 2,554), using random-intercept cross-lagged panel models with a four-wave longitudinal sample from Chile. We discuss the main implications of these results for the literature examining the association between conservatism and well-being.","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":"49 10","pages":"1439-1453"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Longitudinal Test of the Conservative-Liberal Well-Being Gap.\",\"authors\":\"Salvador Vargas Salfate, Sammyh S Khan, James H Liu, Homero Gil de Zúñiga\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01461672221096587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we test if conservatism predicts psychological well-being longitudinally. We based the study on previous findings showing that conservatives score higher on different measures of well-being, such as life satisfaction and happiness. Most explanations in the literature have assumed that conservatism antecedes well-being without considering the alternative—that well-being may predict conservatism. In Study 1, using multilevel cross-lagged panel models with a two-wave longitudinal sample consisting of data from 19 countries (N = 8,740), we found that conservatism did not predict well-being over time. We found similar results in Study 2 (N = 2,554), using random-intercept cross-lagged panel models with a four-wave longitudinal sample from Chile. We discuss the main implications of these results for the literature examining the association between conservatism and well-being.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"49 10\",\"pages\":\"1439-1453\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221096587\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221096587","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

在这篇文章中，我们测试了保守主义是否能纵向预测心理健康。我们的研究基于先前的发现，这些发现表明保守派在不同的幸福感指标上得分更高，比如生活满意度和幸福感。文献中的大多数解释都假设保守主义先于幸福，而没有考虑幸福可能预测保守主义的替代方案。在研究1中，我们使用多水平交叉滞后面板模型和由19个国家（N=8740）的数据组成的两波纵向样本，发现保守主义不能预测幸福感随时间的变化。我们在研究2中发现了类似的结果（N=2554），使用了智利四波纵向样本的随机截距交叉滞后面板模型。我们讨论了这些结果对研究保守主义和幸福感之间关系的文献的主要影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A Longitudinal Test of the Conservative-Liberal Well-Being Gap.

In this article, we test if conservatism predicts psychological well-being longitudinally. We based the study on previous findings showing that conservatives score higher on different measures of well-being, such as life satisfaction and happiness. Most explanations in the literature have assumed that conservatism antecedes well-being without considering the alternative—that well-being may predict conservatism. In Study 1, using multilevel cross-lagged panel models with a two-wave longitudinal sample consisting of data from 19 countries (N = 8,740), we found that conservatism did not predict well-being over time. We found similar results in Study 2 (N = 2,554), using random-intercept cross-lagged panel models with a four-wave longitudinal sample from Chile. We discuss the main implications of these results for the literature examining the association between conservatism and well-being.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

9.20

自引率

5.00%

发文量

116

期刊介绍： The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.