Yusuf Sahin, Filip Paslanmaz, Ismail Ulus, Mehmet Yilmaz, Muhammet Murat Dincer, Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
{"title":"YouTube上女性尿道成形术视频的质量和内容分析","authors":"Yusuf Sahin, Filip Paslanmaz, Ismail Ulus, Mehmet Yilmaz, Muhammet Murat Dincer, Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu","doi":"10.1111/luts.12468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, we aimed to analyze scientific quality and content of female urethroplasty videos on YouTube.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched YouTube using the “female urethroplasty”, “female urethral stricture”, and “urethroplasty” keywords on February 22, 2022. The quality and content of videos were analyzed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and Female Urethroplasty-Specific Checklist Score (FUSCS) which was developed by our clinic. Video analysis was performed by two independent urologists. The relationship between the video characteristics and GQS and FUSCS was examined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 38 videos were analyzed. Fourteen (36.8%) videos were uploaded by academic sources such as urology societies and universities/hospitals, while 24 (63.2%) videos were uploaded by urologists. The median GQS was 3 (range, 2–4) and the median FUSCS was 8 (range, 5–9) for all videos. The Cohen's kappa was 0.834 for GQS and 0.899 for FUSCS, indicating a high level of agreement between the observers. The median GQS was 4 (range, 4–5) and the median FUSCS was 9 (range, 8–10) for academic videos, indicating a statistically significantly higher scores than the urologists videos (<i>p</i> = .002 and <i>p</i> < .001, respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Academic videos on female urethroplasty on YouTube have adequate scientific quality and content for both patients and healthcare professionals. The number of videos by academic sources on female urethroplasty should be increased and individuals should be encouraged to search such videos on search engines.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18028,"journal":{"name":"LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality and content analysis of female urethroplasty videos on YouTube\",\"authors\":\"Yusuf Sahin, Filip Paslanmaz, Ismail Ulus, Mehmet Yilmaz, Muhammet Murat Dincer, Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/luts.12468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this study, we aimed to analyze scientific quality and content of female urethroplasty videos on YouTube.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We searched YouTube using the “female urethroplasty”, “female urethral stricture”, and “urethroplasty” keywords on February 22, 2022. The quality and content of videos were analyzed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and Female Urethroplasty-Specific Checklist Score (FUSCS) which was developed by our clinic. Video analysis was performed by two independent urologists. The relationship between the video characteristics and GQS and FUSCS was examined.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 38 videos were analyzed. Fourteen (36.8%) videos were uploaded by academic sources such as urology societies and universities/hospitals, while 24 (63.2%) videos were uploaded by urologists. The median GQS was 3 (range, 2–4) and the median FUSCS was 8 (range, 5–9) for all videos. The Cohen's kappa was 0.834 for GQS and 0.899 for FUSCS, indicating a high level of agreement between the observers. The median GQS was 4 (range, 4–5) and the median FUSCS was 9 (range, 8–10) for academic videos, indicating a statistically significantly higher scores than the urologists videos (<i>p</i> = .002 and <i>p</i> < .001, respectively).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Academic videos on female urethroplasty on YouTube have adequate scientific quality and content for both patients and healthcare professionals. The number of videos by academic sources on female urethroplasty should be increased and individuals should be encouraged to search such videos on search engines.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/luts.12468\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/luts.12468","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quality and content analysis of female urethroplasty videos on YouTube
Objectives
In this study, we aimed to analyze scientific quality and content of female urethroplasty videos on YouTube.
Methods
We searched YouTube using the “female urethroplasty”, “female urethral stricture”, and “urethroplasty” keywords on February 22, 2022. The quality and content of videos were analyzed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and Female Urethroplasty-Specific Checklist Score (FUSCS) which was developed by our clinic. Video analysis was performed by two independent urologists. The relationship between the video characteristics and GQS and FUSCS was examined.
Results
A total of 38 videos were analyzed. Fourteen (36.8%) videos were uploaded by academic sources such as urology societies and universities/hospitals, while 24 (63.2%) videos were uploaded by urologists. The median GQS was 3 (range, 2–4) and the median FUSCS was 8 (range, 5–9) for all videos. The Cohen's kappa was 0.834 for GQS and 0.899 for FUSCS, indicating a high level of agreement between the observers. The median GQS was 4 (range, 4–5) and the median FUSCS was 9 (range, 8–10) for academic videos, indicating a statistically significantly higher scores than the urologists videos (p = .002 and p < .001, respectively).
Conclusion
Academic videos on female urethroplasty on YouTube have adequate scientific quality and content for both patients and healthcare professionals. The number of videos by academic sources on female urethroplasty should be increased and individuals should be encouraged to search such videos on search engines.
期刊介绍：
LUTS is designed for the timely communication of peer-reviewed studies which provides new clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers in the field of neurourology, urodynamics and urogynecology. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished referees from around the world, some of whom constitute the journal''s Editorial Board. The journal covers both basic and clinical research on lower urinary tract dysfunctions (LUTD), such as overactive bladder (OAB), detrusor underactivity, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse (POP), painful bladder syndrome (PBS), as well as on other relevant conditions. Case reports are published only if new findings are provided.
LUTS is an official journal of the Japanese Continence Society, the Korean Continence Society, and the Taiwanese Continence Society. Submission of papers from all countries are welcome. LUTS has been accepted into Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) with a 2011 Impact Factor.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
