死后抽样的知情同意:参考文献综述。

Alejandra Marcela Ventura Hernández, Geovanna Michele Moya Díaz, Mireya Matamoros Zelaya
{"title":"死后抽样的知情同意:参考文献综述。","authors":"Alejandra Marcela Ventura Hernández,&nbsp;Geovanna Michele Moya Díaz,&nbsp;Mireya Matamoros Zelaya","doi":"10.5377/rcfh.v8i1.14965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Informed consent is based on the principle of personal autonomy, the moral conception of respect for the dignity of the human being and therefore on his freedom. The rest of the universal bioethical principles are articulated in the informed consent process: non-maleficence, justice, and beneficence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Establish the situations in which it is pertinent to apply informed consent in the taking of postmortem samples from a bioethical approach versus a legal approach.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A review was carried out in: SCIELO, LILACS, IBECS, CUMED, NIH, Repository of the Pan American Health Organization; using keywords: informed consent, human rights, autonomy, bioethics, autopsy, post-mortem samples and forensic doctors and a combination of these. The inclusion criteria: articles with a maximum age of five years, in Spanish and English with free access.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>113 articles were obtained using the keywords and their combinations, plus another 43 additional records identified from other sources such as laws, regulations, etc. By eliminating the sources: duplicates, not relevant, disabled, and incomplete, a total of 49 articles were worked on.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a need to include in the national and international ethical guidelines that regulate scientific research and guidelines to follow on the completion of the informed consent process in studies that involve postmortem samples, after their primary use.</p>","PeriodicalId":33639,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Ciencias Forenses de Honduras","volume":"8 1","pages":"26-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10448928/pdf/nihms-1866964.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informed consent of postmortem sampling: Bibliographic review.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandra Marcela Ventura Hernández,&nbsp;Geovanna Michele Moya Díaz,&nbsp;Mireya Matamoros Zelaya\",\"doi\":\"10.5377/rcfh.v8i1.14965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Informed consent is based on the principle of personal autonomy, the moral conception of respect for the dignity of the human being and therefore on his freedom. The rest of the universal bioethical principles are articulated in the informed consent process: non-maleficence, justice, and beneficence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Establish the situations in which it is pertinent to apply informed consent in the taking of postmortem samples from a bioethical approach versus a legal approach.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A review was carried out in: SCIELO, LILACS, IBECS, CUMED, NIH, Repository of the Pan American Health Organization; using keywords: informed consent, human rights, autonomy, bioethics, autopsy, post-mortem samples and forensic doctors and a combination of these. The inclusion criteria: articles with a maximum age of five years, in Spanish and English with free access.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>113 articles were obtained using the keywords and their combinations, plus another 43 additional records identified from other sources such as laws, regulations, etc. By eliminating the sources: duplicates, not relevant, disabled, and incomplete, a total of 49 articles were worked on.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a need to include in the national and international ethical guidelines that regulate scientific research and guidelines to follow on the completion of the informed consent process in studies that involve postmortem samples, after their primary use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Ciencias Forenses de Honduras\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"26-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10448928/pdf/nihms-1866964.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Ciencias Forenses de Honduras\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5377/rcfh.v8i1.14965\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Ciencias Forenses de Honduras","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5377/rcfh.v8i1.14965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:知情同意是基于个人自主的原则,尊重人的尊严的道德观念,因此是基于人的自由。其余的普遍生物伦理原则在知情同意过程中得到了阐述:非恶意、正义和仁慈。目的:确定在从生物伦理方法与法律方法中提取死后样本时适用知情同意的相关情况。方法:在SCIELO、LILACS、IBECS、CUMED、NIH、泛美卫生组织知识库中进行了审查;关键词:知情同意、人权、自主权、生物伦理、尸检、死后样本和法医以及这些的组合。入选标准:文章年龄不超过5年,用西班牙语和英语免费获取。结果:使用关键词及其组合获得了113篇文章,另外还有43条其他来源的记录,如法律、法规等。通过剔除重复、不相关、禁用和不完整的来源,共处理了49篇文章。结论:有必要在规范科学研究的国家和国际伦理准则中纳入准则,并在涉及死后样本的研究中,在其首次使用后完成知情同意程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Informed consent of postmortem sampling: Bibliographic review.

Background: Informed consent is based on the principle of personal autonomy, the moral conception of respect for the dignity of the human being and therefore on his freedom. The rest of the universal bioethical principles are articulated in the informed consent process: non-maleficence, justice, and beneficence.

Objective: Establish the situations in which it is pertinent to apply informed consent in the taking of postmortem samples from a bioethical approach versus a legal approach.

Methodology: A review was carried out in: SCIELO, LILACS, IBECS, CUMED, NIH, Repository of the Pan American Health Organization; using keywords: informed consent, human rights, autonomy, bioethics, autopsy, post-mortem samples and forensic doctors and a combination of these. The inclusion criteria: articles with a maximum age of five years, in Spanish and English with free access.

Results: 113 articles were obtained using the keywords and their combinations, plus another 43 additional records identified from other sources such as laws, regulations, etc. By eliminating the sources: duplicates, not relevant, disabled, and incomplete, a total of 49 articles were worked on.

Conclusions: There is a need to include in the national and international ethical guidelines that regulate scientific research and guidelines to follow on the completion of the informed consent process in studies that involve postmortem samples, after their primary use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信