对加泰罗尼亚护士开处方的好处的看法。卫生专业人员和管理人员的共识

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Glòria Jodar-Solà , Alba Brugués-Brugués , Vicky Serra-Sutton , Mireia Espallargues-Carreras , Alex Trejo-Omeñaca , Josep M. Monguet-Fierro
{"title":"对加泰罗尼亚护士开处方的好处的看法。卫生专业人员和管理人员的共识","authors":"Glòria Jodar-Solà ,&nbsp;Alba Brugués-Brugués ,&nbsp;Vicky Serra-Sutton ,&nbsp;Mireia Espallargues-Carreras ,&nbsp;Alex Trejo-Omeñaca ,&nbsp;Josep M. Monguet-Fierro","doi":"10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To study the level of agreement among health professionals and managers in Catalonia on the benefits of nurse prescribing (NP).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>An online Real Time Delphi was conducted to collect the level of agreement of health professionals and managers. Participants voted in a 6-point scale (1 low benefit and 6 high benefit) for 12 items describing benefits of NP. A total of 1332 professionals participated. The level of consensus was calculated applying interquartile ranges of scores and standardized mean differences among subgroups using effect sizes (ES) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The scores indicate a general agreement on the perceived benefits of NP among participants. Standardized differences among scores on the perceived benefits among professionals were small to high (ES range between 0.2 and 1.2) between nurses and medical doctors and high between nurses and pharmacists (ES range: 1.2 and 2.4). Differences between scores of nurses and those of managers or other professionals in the present study were smaller for most voted benefits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study shows an agreement on the benefits of NP. Nevertheless, when standardized scores are taken into consideration, differences among professionals’ perceptions emerged, and aligned with documented barriers identified in the literature such as corporative aspects, cultural limitations, institutional and organisational inertia, beliefs and unawareness of what NP implies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12494,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta Sanitaria","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 102310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opinion on the benefits of nurse prescribing in Catalonia. Consensus of health professionals and managers\",\"authors\":\"Glòria Jodar-Solà ,&nbsp;Alba Brugués-Brugués ,&nbsp;Vicky Serra-Sutton ,&nbsp;Mireia Espallargues-Carreras ,&nbsp;Alex Trejo-Omeñaca ,&nbsp;Josep M. Monguet-Fierro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To study the level of agreement among health professionals and managers in Catalonia on the benefits of nurse prescribing (NP).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>An online Real Time Delphi was conducted to collect the level of agreement of health professionals and managers. Participants voted in a 6-point scale (1 low benefit and 6 high benefit) for 12 items describing benefits of NP. A total of 1332 professionals participated. The level of consensus was calculated applying interquartile ranges of scores and standardized mean differences among subgroups using effect sizes (ES) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The scores indicate a general agreement on the perceived benefits of NP among participants. Standardized differences among scores on the perceived benefits among professionals were small to high (ES range between 0.2 and 1.2) between nurses and medical doctors and high between nurses and pharmacists (ES range: 1.2 and 2.4). Differences between scores of nurses and those of managers or other professionals in the present study were smaller for most voted benefits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study shows an agreement on the benefits of NP. Nevertheless, when standardized scores are taken into consideration, differences among professionals’ perceptions emerged, and aligned with documented barriers identified in the literature such as corporative aspects, cultural limitations, institutional and organisational inertia, beliefs and unawareness of what NP implies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gaceta Sanitaria\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gaceta Sanitaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911123000249\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta Sanitaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911123000249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究加泰罗尼亚卫生专业人员和管理人员对护士处方(NP)益处的一致性水平。方法采用在线实时德尔菲法收集卫生专业人员和管理人员的一致性水平。参与者对描述NP益处的12个项目进行了6分制(1个低益处和6个高益处)的投票。共有1332名专业人员参与。通过使用效应大小(ES)及其相应的95%置信区间,应用得分的四分位间距和亚组之间的标准化平均差异来计算一致性水平。结果这些分数表明参与者对NP的感知益处总体一致。专业人员对感知利益的标准化评分差异在护士和医生之间从小到高(ES范围在0.2到1.2之间),在护士和药剂师之间从高到高(ES范围在1.2到2.4之间)。在本研究中,护士与管理人员或其他专业人员的评分差异在大多数投票利益中较小。结论该研究表明,在NP的好处上达成了一致。然而,当考虑到标准化分数时,专业人士的看法出现了差异,并与文献中发现的障碍一致,如社团方面、文化局限性、制度和组织惰性、信念和对NP含义的不了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opinion on the benefits of nurse prescribing in Catalonia. Consensus of health professionals and managers

Objective

To study the level of agreement among health professionals and managers in Catalonia on the benefits of nurse prescribing (NP).

Method

An online Real Time Delphi was conducted to collect the level of agreement of health professionals and managers. Participants voted in a 6-point scale (1 low benefit and 6 high benefit) for 12 items describing benefits of NP. A total of 1332 professionals participated. The level of consensus was calculated applying interquartile ranges of scores and standardized mean differences among subgroups using effect sizes (ES) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals.

Results

The scores indicate a general agreement on the perceived benefits of NP among participants. Standardized differences among scores on the perceived benefits among professionals were small to high (ES range between 0.2 and 1.2) between nurses and medical doctors and high between nurses and pharmacists (ES range: 1.2 and 2.4). Differences between scores of nurses and those of managers or other professionals in the present study were smaller for most voted benefits.

Conclusions

The study shows an agreement on the benefits of NP. Nevertheless, when standardized scores are taken into consideration, differences among professionals’ perceptions emerged, and aligned with documented barriers identified in the literature such as corporative aspects, cultural limitations, institutional and organisational inertia, beliefs and unawareness of what NP implies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gaceta Sanitaria
Gaceta Sanitaria 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
80
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Gaceta Sanitaria (Health Gazette) is an international journal that accepts articles in Spanish and in English. It is the official scientific journal of the Sociedad Española de Salud Publica y Administración Sanitaria (Spanish Society of Public Health and Health Administration) (SESPAS). The Journal publishes 6 issues per year on different areas of Public Health and Health Administration, including: -Applied epidemiology- Health prevention and promotion- Environmental health- International health- Management and assessment of policies and services- Health technology assessments- Health economics. The editorial process is regulated by a peer review system. It publishes original works, reviews, opinion articles, field and methodology notes, protocols, letters to the editor, editorials, and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信