评估工作生活领域,对主管的信任和人际信任作为工作压力严重程度的条件。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Agata Chudzicka-Czupała, Damian Grabowski, Agnieszka Czerw, Marta Stasiła-Sieradzka
{"title":"评估工作生活领域,对主管的信任和人际信任作为工作压力严重程度的条件。","authors":"Agata Chudzicka-Czupała,&nbsp;Damian Grabowski,&nbsp;Agnieszka Czerw,&nbsp;Marta Stasiła-Sieradzka","doi":"10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the paper is to present the findings from a study of the relationships between perception of worklife areas and trust in supervisor and interpersonal trust on the one hand, and assessment of the severity of stress at work on the other hand.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study involved 1113 individuals working in different Polish organizations. The <i>Perceived Stress Scale</i> (PSS-10) was used to measure stress severity. Assessments of worklife areas were measured using the <i>Areas of Worklife Survey</i>, while trust was measured using the <i>Trust in Supervisor Scale</i> and the <i>Interpersonal Trust Measures</i>, a tool for measuring trust in co-workers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The regression analysis results prove that stress severity depends to the largest extent on the assessment of worklife areas (workload, reward, and values), as well as trust in the skills and competencies of the supervisor and trust in co-workers, based on cognitive factors. The role of trust in the supervisor, emphasizing the latter's benevolence and the belief in their integrity and of trust in co-workers, based on emotions, and the relationships of these variables with stress require clarification. The model turned out to be statistically significant, the variables included in the model explain 45% of the variability of the dependent variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Assessment of worklife areas is more significant for stress level prediction than the trust dimensions studied. Conclusions concerning the relationships between trust and stress must be cautious, and the matter should be studied further. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022;35(6):719-30.</p>","PeriodicalId":14173,"journal":{"name":"International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/f5/ijomeh-35-719.PMC10464817.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of worklife areas, trust in supervisor and interpersonal trust as conditions of severity of stress at work.\",\"authors\":\"Agata Chudzicka-Czupała,&nbsp;Damian Grabowski,&nbsp;Agnieszka Czerw,&nbsp;Marta Stasiła-Sieradzka\",\"doi\":\"10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the paper is to present the findings from a study of the relationships between perception of worklife areas and trust in supervisor and interpersonal trust on the one hand, and assessment of the severity of stress at work on the other hand.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study involved 1113 individuals working in different Polish organizations. The <i>Perceived Stress Scale</i> (PSS-10) was used to measure stress severity. Assessments of worklife areas were measured using the <i>Areas of Worklife Survey</i>, while trust was measured using the <i>Trust in Supervisor Scale</i> and the <i>Interpersonal Trust Measures</i>, a tool for measuring trust in co-workers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The regression analysis results prove that stress severity depends to the largest extent on the assessment of worklife areas (workload, reward, and values), as well as trust in the skills and competencies of the supervisor and trust in co-workers, based on cognitive factors. The role of trust in the supervisor, emphasizing the latter's benevolence and the belief in their integrity and of trust in co-workers, based on emotions, and the relationships of these variables with stress require clarification. The model turned out to be statistically significant, the variables included in the model explain 45% of the variability of the dependent variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Assessment of worklife areas is more significant for stress level prediction than the trust dimensions studied. Conclusions concerning the relationships between trust and stress must be cautious, and the matter should be studied further. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022;35(6):719-30.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/f5/ijomeh-35-719.PMC10464817.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01990\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01990","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本文的目的是通过研究工作生活领域感知与上司信任和人际信任之间的关系,以及对工作压力严重程度的评估来呈现研究结果。材料和方法:该研究涉及在不同波兰组织工作的1113个人。采用感知压力量表(PSS-10)测量压力严重程度。工作生活领域的评估是用工作生活领域调查来衡量的,而信任是用主管信任量表和人际信任量表来衡量的,人际信任量表是衡量同事信任的工具。结果:回归分析结果表明,压力严重程度最大程度取决于对工作生活领域(工作量、报酬和价值观)的评估,以及基于认知因素的对主管技能和能力的信任和对同事的信任。对上司的信任,强调后者的仁慈和对其正直的信念,以及对同事的信任,基于情绪的作用,以及这些变量与压力的关系需要澄清。该模型被证明具有统计显著性,模型中包含的变量解释了45%的因变量变异性。结论:工作生活领域的评估对压力水平的预测比信任维度更有意义。关于信任与压力关系的结论必须谨慎,并应进一步研究。中华医学杂志,2010;35(6):719- 730。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessment of worklife areas, trust in supervisor and interpersonal trust as conditions of severity of stress at work.

Assessment of worklife areas, trust in supervisor and interpersonal trust as conditions of severity of stress at work.

Objectives: The aim of the paper is to present the findings from a study of the relationships between perception of worklife areas and trust in supervisor and interpersonal trust on the one hand, and assessment of the severity of stress at work on the other hand.

Material and methods: The study involved 1113 individuals working in different Polish organizations. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) was used to measure stress severity. Assessments of worklife areas were measured using the Areas of Worklife Survey, while trust was measured using the Trust in Supervisor Scale and the Interpersonal Trust Measures, a tool for measuring trust in co-workers.

Results: The regression analysis results prove that stress severity depends to the largest extent on the assessment of worklife areas (workload, reward, and values), as well as trust in the skills and competencies of the supervisor and trust in co-workers, based on cognitive factors. The role of trust in the supervisor, emphasizing the latter's benevolence and the belief in their integrity and of trust in co-workers, based on emotions, and the relationships of these variables with stress require clarification. The model turned out to be statistically significant, the variables included in the model explain 45% of the variability of the dependent variable.

Conclusions: Assessment of worklife areas is more significant for stress level prediction than the trust dimensions studied. Conclusions concerning the relationships between trust and stress must be cautious, and the matter should be studied further. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022;35(6):719-30.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal is dedicated to present the contemporary research in occupational and environmental health from all over the world. It publishes works concerning: occupational and environmental: medicine, epidemiology, hygiene and toxicology; work physiology and ergonomics, musculoskeletal problems; psychosocial factors at work, work-related mental problems, aging, work ability and return to work; working hours, shift work; reproductive factors and endocrine disruptors; radiation, ionizing and non-ionizing health effects; agricultural hazards; work safety and injury and occupational health service; climate change and its effects on health; omics, genetics and epigenetics in occupational and environmental health; health effects of exposure to nanoparticles and nanotechnology products; human biomarkers in occupational and environmental health, intervention studies, clinical sciences’ achievements with potential to improve occupational and environmental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信