对数学美感的判断是无法通过外部意见进行修正的。

IF 1.3 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

PsyCh journal Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1002/pchj.556

Haoxuan Zhang, Semir Zeki

{"title":"对数学美感的判断是无法通过外部意见进行修正的。","authors":"Haoxuan Zhang, Semir Zeki","doi":"10.1002/pchj.556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We here address the question of the extent to which judgments of mathematical beauty (which we categorize as biological beauty) are resistant to revision through external opinion. A total of 100 mathematicians of different national and ethnic origins were asked to rate 60 mathematical equations for their beauty; after being presented a fictitious \"expert rating,\" they were asked to re-rate the same equations. Results showed that the judgments of mathematical beauty had a high level of resistance to external opinion. This is in line with the resistance to revision of a judgments for other categories of biological beauty.","PeriodicalId":20804,"journal":{"name":"PsyCh journal","volume":"11 5","pages":"741-747"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judgments of mathematical beauty are resistant to revision through external opinion.\",\"authors\":\"Haoxuan Zhang, Semir Zeki\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pchj.556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We here address the question of the extent to which judgments of mathematical beauty (which we categorize as biological beauty) are resistant to revision through external opinion. A total of 100 mathematicians of different national and ethnic origins were asked to rate 60 mathematical equations for their beauty; after being presented a fictitious \\\"expert rating,\\\" they were asked to re-rate the same equations. Results showed that the judgments of mathematical beauty had a high level of resistance to external opinion. This is in line with the resistance to revision of a judgments for other categories of biological beauty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PsyCh journal\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"741-747\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790661/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PsyCh journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.556\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PsyCh journal","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.556","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们在此探讨的问题是，对数学美（我们将其归类为生物美）的判断在多大程度上能够抵御外部意见的修正。我们要求 100 名来自不同国家和民族的数学家对 60 个数学公式的美感进行评分；在获得虚构的 "专家评分 "后，我们要求他们重新对相同的公式进行评分。结果表明，对数学美的评判对外部意见的抵制程度很高。这与其他类别的生物美的评判在修改时遇到的阻力是一致的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Judgments of mathematical beauty are resistant to revision through external opinion.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Judgments of mathematical beauty are resistant to revision through external opinion.

We here address the question of the extent to which judgments of mathematical beauty (which we categorize as biological beauty) are resistant to revision through external opinion. A total of 100 mathematicians of different national and ethnic origins were asked to rate 60 mathematical equations for their beauty; after being presented a fictitious "expert rating," they were asked to re-rate the same equations. Results showed that the judgments of mathematical beauty had a high level of resistance to external opinion. This is in line with the resistance to revision of a judgments for other categories of biological beauty.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

PsyCh journal PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

12.50%

发文量

109

期刊介绍： PsyCh Journal, China''s first international psychology journal, publishes peer‑reviewed research articles, research reports and integrated research reviews spanning the entire spectrum of scientific psychology and its applications. PsyCh Journal is the flagship journal of the Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences – the only national psychology research institute in China – and reflects the high research standards of the nation. Launched in 2012, PsyCh Journal is devoted to the publication of advanced research exploring basic mechanisms of the human mind and behavior, and delivering scientific knowledge to enhance understanding of culture and society. Towards that broader goal, the Journal will provide a forum for academic exchange and a “knowledge bridge” between China and the World by showcasing high-quality, cutting-edge research related to the science and practice of psychology both within and outside of China. PsyCh Journal features original articles of both empirical and theoretical research in scientific psychology and interdisciplinary sciences, across all levels, from molecular, cellular and system, to individual, group and society. The Journal also publishes evaluative and integrative review papers on any significant research contribution in any area of scientific psychology