输血的起源:欧洲文学和意大利关于新发明的辩论(1667-1668)

IF 0.2 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Silvia Marinozzi, Daniela Messineo, Giuseppe Sanese
{"title":"输血的起源:欧洲文学和意大利关于新发明的辩论(1667-1668)","authors":"Silvia Marinozzi,&nbsp;Daniela Messineo,&nbsp;Giuseppe Sanese","doi":"10.31952/amha.20.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper deals with the literary debate on the first experiments regarding blood transfusion on human beings between 1667 and 1668 in Europe, with particular attention to the less-known experimental research, carried out in Italy. The authors examine the details of the experimental developments, focusing on the techniques and instruments used by physicians involved in this new surgical approach, with special attention to the Italian debate and experimentations. The article suggests that transfusion was considered a part of what we could call \"emergency surgery\". In this framework, Italian transfusional pioneers played a central role in the improvement and transmission of a discipline that was still in its dawning throughout Europe. Moreover, the manuscript highlights the contribution of the \"chirurgia infusoria\" as an innovative therapeutic system for an immediate and rapid recovery. From this perspective, blood transfusion represents a surgical practice for reanimation and resuscitation. The objective of this work was to analyze the importance of foreign literature and the English and French disputes presented by Davia in Italy, which made them known. Despite foreign prohibition in Italy, experiments with animal-to-human transfusions continued after 1648. A papal bull excommunicating scientists for conducting such research has never been found.</p>","PeriodicalId":42656,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica","volume":"20 1","pages":"27-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE ORIGINS OF THE BLOOD TRANSFUSION: EUROPEAN LITERATURE AND ITALIAN DEBATE ON NEW INNOVATIONS (1667-1668)\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Marinozzi,&nbsp;Daniela Messineo,&nbsp;Giuseppe Sanese\",\"doi\":\"10.31952/amha.20.1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper deals with the literary debate on the first experiments regarding blood transfusion on human beings between 1667 and 1668 in Europe, with particular attention to the less-known experimental research, carried out in Italy. The authors examine the details of the experimental developments, focusing on the techniques and instruments used by physicians involved in this new surgical approach, with special attention to the Italian debate and experimentations. The article suggests that transfusion was considered a part of what we could call \\\"emergency surgery\\\". In this framework, Italian transfusional pioneers played a central role in the improvement and transmission of a discipline that was still in its dawning throughout Europe. Moreover, the manuscript highlights the contribution of the \\\"chirurgia infusoria\\\" as an innovative therapeutic system for an immediate and rapid recovery. From this perspective, blood transfusion represents a surgical practice for reanimation and resuscitation. The objective of this work was to analyze the importance of foreign literature and the English and French disputes presented by Davia in Italy, which made them known. Despite foreign prohibition in Italy, experiments with animal-to-human transfusions continued after 1648. A papal bull excommunicating scientists for conducting such research has never been found.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"27-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31952/amha.20.1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31952/amha.20.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了1667年至1668年欧洲关于人类输血的第一次实验的文学辩论,特别关注在意大利进行的不太为人所知的实验研究。作者研究了实验发展的细节,重点关注了参与这种新手术方法的医生使用的技术和仪器,特别注意了意大利的辩论和实验。这篇文章表明输血被认为是我们所说的“紧急手术”的一部分。在这个框架下,意大利输血先驱在整个欧洲仍处于萌芽阶段的一门学科的改进和传播中发挥了核心作用。此外,该手稿强调了“滴虫”作为一种创新的治疗系统的贡献,可以立即和快速恢复。从这个角度来看,输血代表了一种恢复活力和复苏的外科实践。这项工作的目的是分析外国文学的重要性和英国和法国的争论提出了达维亚在意大利,这使他们知道。尽管国外禁止在意大利进行,但1648年后,动物向人类输血的实验仍在继续。从未有过教皇对从事此类研究的科学家发出逐出教会的命令。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE ORIGINS OF THE BLOOD TRANSFUSION: EUROPEAN LITERATURE AND ITALIAN DEBATE ON NEW INNOVATIONS (1667-1668)

This paper deals with the literary debate on the first experiments regarding blood transfusion on human beings between 1667 and 1668 in Europe, with particular attention to the less-known experimental research, carried out in Italy. The authors examine the details of the experimental developments, focusing on the techniques and instruments used by physicians involved in this new surgical approach, with special attention to the Italian debate and experimentations. The article suggests that transfusion was considered a part of what we could call "emergency surgery". In this framework, Italian transfusional pioneers played a central role in the improvement and transmission of a discipline that was still in its dawning throughout Europe. Moreover, the manuscript highlights the contribution of the "chirurgia infusoria" as an innovative therapeutic system for an immediate and rapid recovery. From this perspective, blood transfusion represents a surgical practice for reanimation and resuscitation. The objective of this work was to analyze the importance of foreign literature and the English and French disputes presented by Davia in Italy, which made them known. Despite foreign prohibition in Italy, experiments with animal-to-human transfusions continued after 1648. A papal bull excommunicating scientists for conducting such research has never been found.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica
Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信