CODATA 基本物理常数推荐值:2018 年。

IF 45.9 1区 物理与天体物理 Q1 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Reviews of Modern Physics Pub Date : 2021-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-30 DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025010
Eite Tiesinga, Peter J Mohr, David B Newell, Barry N Taylor
{"title":"CODATA 基本物理常数推荐值:2018 年。","authors":"Eite Tiesinga, Peter J Mohr, David B Newell, Barry N Taylor","doi":"10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We report the 2018 self-consistent values of constants and conversion factors of physics and chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data of the International Science Council (CODATA). The recommended values can also be found at physics.nist.gov/constants. The values are based on a least-squares adjustment that takes into account all theoretical and experimental data available through 31 December 2018. A discussion of the major improvements as well as inconsistencies within the data is given. The former include a decrease in the uncertainty of the dimensionless fine-structure constant and a nearly two orders of magnitude improvement of particle masses expressed in units of kg due to the transition to the revised International System of Units (SI) with an exact value for the Planck constant. Further, because the elementary charge, Boltzmann constant, and Avogadro constant also have exact values in the revised SI, many other constants are either exact or have significantly reduced uncertainties. Inconsistencies remain for the gravitational constant and the muon magnetic-moment anomaly. The proton charge radius puzzle has been partially resolved by improved measurements of hydrogen energy levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":21172,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of Modern Physics","volume":"93 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":45.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9890581/pdf/nihms-1855294.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018.\",\"authors\":\"Eite Tiesinga, Peter J Mohr, David B Newell, Barry N Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We report the 2018 self-consistent values of constants and conversion factors of physics and chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data of the International Science Council (CODATA). The recommended values can also be found at physics.nist.gov/constants. The values are based on a least-squares adjustment that takes into account all theoretical and experimental data available through 31 December 2018. A discussion of the major improvements as well as inconsistencies within the data is given. The former include a decrease in the uncertainty of the dimensionless fine-structure constant and a nearly two orders of magnitude improvement of particle masses expressed in units of kg due to the transition to the revised International System of Units (SI) with an exact value for the Planck constant. Further, because the elementary charge, Boltzmann constant, and Avogadro constant also have exact values in the revised SI, many other constants are either exact or have significantly reduced uncertainties. Inconsistencies remain for the gravitational constant and the muon magnetic-moment anomaly. The proton charge radius puzzle has been partially resolved by improved measurements of hydrogen energy levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews of Modern Physics\",\"volume\":\"93 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":45.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9890581/pdf/nihms-1855294.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews of Modern Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025010\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews of Modern Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们报告了国际科学理事会数据委员会(CODATA)推荐的 2018 年物理和化学常数和换算系数的自洽值。建议值也可在physics.nist.gov/constants找到。这些数值基于最小二乘法调整,考虑了截至 2018 年 12 月 31 日的所有理论和实验数据。文中讨论了数据的主要改进和不一致之处。前者包括无量纲精细结构常数不确定性的降低,以及由于过渡到修订后的国际单位制(SI),普朗克常数有了精确值,以千克为单位的粒子质量提高了近两个数量级。此外,由于基本电荷、玻尔兹曼常数和阿伏加德罗常数在修订后的国际单位制中也有了精确值,许多其他常数要么精确,要么不确定性大大降低。引力常数和μ介子磁矩反常值仍存在不一致之处。质子电荷半径之谜已通过改进氢能级测量得到部分解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018.

We report the 2018 self-consistent values of constants and conversion factors of physics and chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data of the International Science Council (CODATA). The recommended values can also be found at physics.nist.gov/constants. The values are based on a least-squares adjustment that takes into account all theoretical and experimental data available through 31 December 2018. A discussion of the major improvements as well as inconsistencies within the data is given. The former include a decrease in the uncertainty of the dimensionless fine-structure constant and a nearly two orders of magnitude improvement of particle masses expressed in units of kg due to the transition to the revised International System of Units (SI) with an exact value for the Planck constant. Further, because the elementary charge, Boltzmann constant, and Avogadro constant also have exact values in the revised SI, many other constants are either exact or have significantly reduced uncertainties. Inconsistencies remain for the gravitational constant and the muon magnetic-moment anomaly. The proton charge radius puzzle has been partially resolved by improved measurements of hydrogen energy levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews of Modern Physics
Reviews of Modern Physics 物理-物理:综合
CiteScore
76.20
自引率
0.70%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Reviews of Modern Physics (RMP) stands as the world's foremost physics review journal and is the most extensively cited publication within the Physical Review collection. Authored by leading international researchers, RMP's comprehensive essays offer exceptional coverage of a topic, providing context and background for contemporary research trends. Since 1929, RMP has served as an unparalleled platform for authoritative review papers across all physics domains. The journal publishes two types of essays: Reviews and Colloquia. Review articles deliver the present state of a given topic, including historical context, a critical synthesis of research progress, and a summary of potential future developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信