组织化学和免疫组织化学技术在熟香肠肺组织检测中的应用。

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
M Sami, R Kheirandis, A Nasri, Sh Dabiri
{"title":"组织化学和免疫组织化学技术在熟香肠肺组织检测中的应用。","authors":"M Sami,&nbsp;R Kheirandis,&nbsp;A Nasri,&nbsp;Sh Dabiri","doi":"10.22099/IJVR.2022.40333.5849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using unauthorized tissues in sausage is a common food adulteration in some parts of the world.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study was designed to compare the accuracy of histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques for the detection of lung tissue in cooked sausage samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Samples with different levels of sheep lung tissues (1, 2.5, and 5%) and a control group were prepared and stained histochemically using H&E, Masson trichrome, and Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) stainings, and immunohistochemically using two different commercially-available antibodies of TTF1 Pan-cytokeratin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest positive results of lung tissue detection were achieved in sausage samples stained with anti-TTF1 immunohistochemical staining method. Both anti-TTF1 and anti-pan-cytokeratin immunohistochemical techniques detected all contaminated sausage samples treated with 50 g/kg lung tissues. Anti-TTF1 staining method had the highest odds ratio (7.4), followed by anti-pan-cytokeratin method (6.0). Reversely, PAS staining method had the lowest odds ratio (0.21), followed by Masson trichrome method (1.7). Additionally, anti-TTF1 method had the highest (1.8-31.0) confidence intervale (95%), while PAS had the lowest (0.02-2.1). Totally, the odds ratio of lung tissue detected by immunohistochemical methods were higher than those detected by histochemical staining.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first report on the comparison of histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques for lung tissue detection in cooked sausage. Anti-TTF1 immunohistochemical staining proved to be the most useful technique for the detection of unauthorized lung tissue in cooked sausages.</p>","PeriodicalId":14629,"journal":{"name":"Iranian journal of veterinary research","volume":"23 2","pages":"147-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441162/pdf/jvr-23-147.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques for detection of lung tissue in cooked sausage.\",\"authors\":\"M Sami,&nbsp;R Kheirandis,&nbsp;A Nasri,&nbsp;Sh Dabiri\",\"doi\":\"10.22099/IJVR.2022.40333.5849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using unauthorized tissues in sausage is a common food adulteration in some parts of the world.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study was designed to compare the accuracy of histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques for the detection of lung tissue in cooked sausage samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Samples with different levels of sheep lung tissues (1, 2.5, and 5%) and a control group were prepared and stained histochemically using H&E, Masson trichrome, and Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) stainings, and immunohistochemically using two different commercially-available antibodies of TTF1 Pan-cytokeratin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest positive results of lung tissue detection were achieved in sausage samples stained with anti-TTF1 immunohistochemical staining method. Both anti-TTF1 and anti-pan-cytokeratin immunohistochemical techniques detected all contaminated sausage samples treated with 50 g/kg lung tissues. Anti-TTF1 staining method had the highest odds ratio (7.4), followed by anti-pan-cytokeratin method (6.0). Reversely, PAS staining method had the lowest odds ratio (0.21), followed by Masson trichrome method (1.7). Additionally, anti-TTF1 method had the highest (1.8-31.0) confidence intervale (95%), while PAS had the lowest (0.02-2.1). Totally, the odds ratio of lung tissue detected by immunohistochemical methods were higher than those detected by histochemical staining.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first report on the comparison of histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques for lung tissue detection in cooked sausage. Anti-TTF1 immunohistochemical staining proved to be the most useful technique for the detection of unauthorized lung tissue in cooked sausages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian journal of veterinary research\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"147-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441162/pdf/jvr-23-147.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian journal of veterinary research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22099/IJVR.2022.40333.5849\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22099/IJVR.2022.40333.5849","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在香肠中使用未经授权的组织是世界上一些地区常见的食品掺假。目的:本研究旨在比较组织化学和免疫组织化学技术在熟香肠样品中检测肺组织的准确性。方法:制备不同水平羊肺组织(1、2.5和5%)和对照组,采用H&E、Masson三色和周期性酸-希夫(PAS)染色进行组织化学染色,采用两种不同的市购TTF1泛细胞角蛋白抗体进行免疫组织化学染色。结果:用抗ttf1免疫组化染色法染色的香肠样品肺组织检测阳性结果最高。用抗ttf1和抗泛细胞角蛋白免疫组化技术检测50 g/kg肺组织处理的所有污染香肠样品。抗ttf1染色法的比值比最高(7.4),其次是抗泛细胞角蛋白法(6.0)。相反,PAS染色法的优势比最低(0.21),其次是Masson三色法(1.7)。此外,anti-TTF1法的置信区间最高(1.8 ~ 31.0)(95%),而PAS法的置信区间最低(0.02 ~ 2.1)。总的来说,免疫组化法检测肺组织的比值比高于组织化学染色法检测肺组织的比值比。结论:本文首次报道了组织化学技术与免疫组织化学技术在熟香肠肺组织检测中的比较。抗ttf1免疫组织化学染色被证明是检测熟香肠中未经授权的肺组织最有用的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Application of histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques for detection of lung tissue in cooked sausage.

Application of histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques for detection of lung tissue in cooked sausage.

Application of histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques for detection of lung tissue in cooked sausage.

Background: Using unauthorized tissues in sausage is a common food adulteration in some parts of the world.

Aims: This study was designed to compare the accuracy of histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques for the detection of lung tissue in cooked sausage samples.

Methods: Samples with different levels of sheep lung tissues (1, 2.5, and 5%) and a control group were prepared and stained histochemically using H&E, Masson trichrome, and Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) stainings, and immunohistochemically using two different commercially-available antibodies of TTF1 Pan-cytokeratin.

Results: The highest positive results of lung tissue detection were achieved in sausage samples stained with anti-TTF1 immunohistochemical staining method. Both anti-TTF1 and anti-pan-cytokeratin immunohistochemical techniques detected all contaminated sausage samples treated with 50 g/kg lung tissues. Anti-TTF1 staining method had the highest odds ratio (7.4), followed by anti-pan-cytokeratin method (6.0). Reversely, PAS staining method had the lowest odds ratio (0.21), followed by Masson trichrome method (1.7). Additionally, anti-TTF1 method had the highest (1.8-31.0) confidence intervale (95%), while PAS had the lowest (0.02-2.1). Totally, the odds ratio of lung tissue detected by immunohistochemical methods were higher than those detected by histochemical staining.

Conclusion: This is the first report on the comparison of histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques for lung tissue detection in cooked sausage. Anti-TTF1 immunohistochemical staining proved to be the most useful technique for the detection of unauthorized lung tissue in cooked sausages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research(IJVR) is published quarterly in 4 issues. The aims of this journal are to improve and expand knowledge in all veterinary fields. It is an international journal indexed by the Thomson Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), Elsevier, Scopus, CAB International, Veterinary Bulletin and several other international databases. Research papers and reports on a wide range of veterinary topics are published in the journal after being evaluated by expert reviewers.The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for the editorial content of the journal—including peer-reviewed manuscripts—and the timing of its publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信