2纳米填充通用树脂复合材料的表面光泽度、保光性和颜色稳定性。

Gustavo Fabián Molina, Ricardo Juan Cabral, Ignacio Mazzola, Michael Burrow
{"title":"2纳米填充通用树脂复合材料的表面光泽度、保光性和颜色稳定性。","authors":"Gustavo Fabián Molina,&nbsp;Ricardo Juan Cabral,&nbsp;Ignacio Mazzola,&nbsp;Michael Burrow","doi":"10.5395/rde.2022.47.e43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared the surface gloss (SG), gloss retention (GR), and color stability (CS) of 2 universal resin composites after chemical (CA) and mechanical (MA) aging.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty disc-shaped samples of G-ænial A´Chord (GC-Europe) and Filtek Universal (3M-ESPE) were polished with sequential abrasive papers. For CA, specimens were stored in 1 mL of 75% ethanol for 15 days at 37°C, and readings (SG, GR, and CS) were obtained at baseline and 5, 10, and 15 days. For MA, specimens were subjected to 10,750 simulated brushing cycles. SG and CS were evaluated after every 3,583 cycles. SG was measured with a glossmeter (geometrical configuration: 60°), and values were expressed in gloss units. Color was measured with a spectrophotometer using the CIE-L*a*b* color system. The Student's <i>t</i>-test, 1-way analysis of variance, and Scheffé test were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>G-ænial presented significantly higher SG values than Filtek (<i>p</i> = 0.02), with GR reductions of 5.2% (CA) and 5.3% (MA) for G-ænial and 7.6% (CA) and 7.2% (MA) for Filtek. The aging protocol had no statistically significant effect on SG or GR (<i>p</i> = 0.25) from baseline to the final readings. G-ænial-MA presented the lowest color difference <i>(∆E</i> = 1.8), and G-ænial-CA and Filtek-CA had the largest changes (<i>∆E</i> = 8.6 and <i>∆E</i> = 11.8, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>G-ænial presented higher SG values and better CS. Both restorative materials demonstrated acceptable GR and CS. Aging protocols impacted these properties negatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":21102,"journal":{"name":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","volume":"47 4","pages":"e43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/24/ce/rde-47-e43.PMC9715371.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surface gloss, gloss retention, and color stability of 2 nano-filled universal resin composites.\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo Fabián Molina,&nbsp;Ricardo Juan Cabral,&nbsp;Ignacio Mazzola,&nbsp;Michael Burrow\",\"doi\":\"10.5395/rde.2022.47.e43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared the surface gloss (SG), gloss retention (GR), and color stability (CS) of 2 universal resin composites after chemical (CA) and mechanical (MA) aging.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty disc-shaped samples of G-ænial A´Chord (GC-Europe) and Filtek Universal (3M-ESPE) were polished with sequential abrasive papers. For CA, specimens were stored in 1 mL of 75% ethanol for 15 days at 37°C, and readings (SG, GR, and CS) were obtained at baseline and 5, 10, and 15 days. For MA, specimens were subjected to 10,750 simulated brushing cycles. SG and CS were evaluated after every 3,583 cycles. SG was measured with a glossmeter (geometrical configuration: 60°), and values were expressed in gloss units. Color was measured with a spectrophotometer using the CIE-L*a*b* color system. The Student's <i>t</i>-test, 1-way analysis of variance, and Scheffé test were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>G-ænial presented significantly higher SG values than Filtek (<i>p</i> = 0.02), with GR reductions of 5.2% (CA) and 5.3% (MA) for G-ænial and 7.6% (CA) and 7.2% (MA) for Filtek. The aging protocol had no statistically significant effect on SG or GR (<i>p</i> = 0.25) from baseline to the final readings. G-ænial-MA presented the lowest color difference <i>(∆E</i> = 1.8), and G-ænial-CA and Filtek-CA had the largest changes (<i>∆E</i> = 8.6 and <i>∆E</i> = 11.8, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>G-ænial presented higher SG values and better CS. Both restorative materials demonstrated acceptable GR and CS. Aging protocols impacted these properties negatively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"e43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/24/ce/rde-47-e43.PMC9715371.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:比较两种通用树脂复合材料经化学(CA)和机械(MA)老化后的表面光泽度(SG)、光泽度(GR)和颜色稳定性(CS)。材料和方法:用顺序磨纸对G-ænial A´Chord (GC-Europe)和Filtek Universal (3M-ESPE)的20个圆盘状样品进行抛光。对于CA,标本在1 mL 75%乙醇中保存15天,在37°C下保存15天,并在基线和5、10和15天获得读数(SG、GR和CS)。对于MA,试件进行了10,750次模拟刷刷循环。每3583个周期后对SG和CS进行评估。用光泽度计(几何配置:60°)测量SG,数值以光泽度单位表示。采用CIE-L*a*b*显色系统,用分光光度计测色。统计学分析采用Student’st检验、单因素方差分析和scheff检验(α = 0.05)。结果:G-ænial的SG值显著高于Filtek (p = 0.02), G-ænial的GR降低了5.2% (CA)和5.3% (MA), Filtek的GR降低了7.6% (CA)和7.2% (MA)。从基线到最终读数,老化方案对SG或GR没有统计学显著影响(p = 0.25)。G-ænial-MA颜色差异最小(∆E = 1.8), G-ænial-CA和Filtek-CA变化最大(∆E = 8.6和∆E = 11.8)。结论:G-ænial具有较高的SG值和较好的CS。两种修复材料均表现出可接受的GR和CS。老化协议对这些特性有负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Surface gloss, gloss retention, and color stability of 2 nano-filled universal resin composites.

Surface gloss, gloss retention, and color stability of 2 nano-filled universal resin composites.

Surface gloss, gloss retention, and color stability of 2 nano-filled universal resin composites.

Surface gloss, gloss retention, and color stability of 2 nano-filled universal resin composites.

Objectives: This study compared the surface gloss (SG), gloss retention (GR), and color stability (CS) of 2 universal resin composites after chemical (CA) and mechanical (MA) aging.

Materials and methods: Twenty disc-shaped samples of G-ænial A´Chord (GC-Europe) and Filtek Universal (3M-ESPE) were polished with sequential abrasive papers. For CA, specimens were stored in 1 mL of 75% ethanol for 15 days at 37°C, and readings (SG, GR, and CS) were obtained at baseline and 5, 10, and 15 days. For MA, specimens were subjected to 10,750 simulated brushing cycles. SG and CS were evaluated after every 3,583 cycles. SG was measured with a glossmeter (geometrical configuration: 60°), and values were expressed in gloss units. Color was measured with a spectrophotometer using the CIE-L*a*b* color system. The Student's t-test, 1-way analysis of variance, and Scheffé test were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05).

Results: G-ænial presented significantly higher SG values than Filtek (p = 0.02), with GR reductions of 5.2% (CA) and 5.3% (MA) for G-ænial and 7.6% (CA) and 7.2% (MA) for Filtek. The aging protocol had no statistically significant effect on SG or GR (p = 0.25) from baseline to the final readings. G-ænial-MA presented the lowest color difference (∆E = 1.8), and G-ænial-CA and Filtek-CA had the largest changes (∆E = 8.6 and ∆E = 11.8, respectively).

Conclusion: G-ænial presented higher SG values and better CS. Both restorative materials demonstrated acceptable GR and CS. Aging protocols impacted these properties negatively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信