美国人对寨卡病毒有多害怕?威胁、效能和第三人知觉在诱导保护行为中的作用。

Q3 Health Professions
Nan Zheng, Alexandra M Vilela, Sameer Deshpande
{"title":"美国人对寨卡病毒有多害怕?威胁、效能和第三人知觉在诱导保护行为中的作用。","authors":"Nan Zheng,&nbsp;Alexandra M Vilela,&nbsp;Sameer Deshpande","doi":"10.1080/07359683.2022.2092376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines how public perception of threat and efficacy (on self and others) influence their tendency to take preventive action against the Zika virus by surveying 1,152 U.S. adults in Texas and Florida. Findings show that individuals were likely to take protective actions when they: (1) saw a high risk of the disease (high threat) and were confident about their ability to reduce the danger (high efficacy); and (2) perceived <i>others</i> as having a high risk (high threat), but lacked the ability to reduce the danger (low efficacy). Further, the study discusses practical implications for the design of public health campaigns.</p>","PeriodicalId":36008,"journal":{"name":"Health Marketing Quarterly","volume":"40 3","pages":"289-308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How scared are Americans of the Zika virus? The role of threat, efficacy, and third-person perception to induce protective behaviors.\",\"authors\":\"Nan Zheng,&nbsp;Alexandra M Vilela,&nbsp;Sameer Deshpande\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07359683.2022.2092376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examines how public perception of threat and efficacy (on self and others) influence their tendency to take preventive action against the Zika virus by surveying 1,152 U.S. adults in Texas and Florida. Findings show that individuals were likely to take protective actions when they: (1) saw a high risk of the disease (high threat) and were confident about their ability to reduce the danger (high efficacy); and (2) perceived <i>others</i> as having a high risk (high threat), but lacked the ability to reduce the danger (low efficacy). Further, the study discusses practical implications for the design of public health campaigns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Marketing Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"289-308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Marketing Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07359683.2022.2092376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Marketing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07359683.2022.2092376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究调查了1152名美国人,调查了公众对威胁和效力(对自己和他人)的看法如何影响他们对寨卡病毒采取预防措施的倾向德克萨斯州和佛罗里达州的成年人研究结果表明,个人在以下情况下可能采取保护行动:(1)看到疾病的高风险(高威胁)并对自己降低危险的能力有信心(高效力);(2)认为他人具有高风险(高威胁),但缺乏降低危险的能力(低效能)。此外,研究还讨论了公共卫生运动设计的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How scared are Americans of the Zika virus? The role of threat, efficacy, and third-person perception to induce protective behaviors.

This study examines how public perception of threat and efficacy (on self and others) influence their tendency to take preventive action against the Zika virus by surveying 1,152 U.S. adults in Texas and Florida. Findings show that individuals were likely to take protective actions when they: (1) saw a high risk of the disease (high threat) and were confident about their ability to reduce the danger (high efficacy); and (2) perceived others as having a high risk (high threat), but lacked the ability to reduce the danger (low efficacy). Further, the study discusses practical implications for the design of public health campaigns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Marketing Quarterly
Health Marketing Quarterly Health Professions-Health Professions (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Health Marketing Quarterly is directed at academicians and practitioners who are concerned with the concepts, practice, and research of health care marketing in today"s complex environment. The journal addresses important contemporary issues in the use of marketing by health care organizations like hospitals, individual practitioners, and public health care organizations. This includes the use of marketing to promote, position, deter, enhance health care organizations/issues, and the development of the marketing literature on both a conceptual and empirical basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信