抗血管内皮生长因子治疗息肉样脉络膜血管病变:系统综述。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-17 DOI:10.1159/000533529
Andrew Mihalache, Amin Hatamnejad, Nikhil S Patil, Marko M Popovic, Rajeev H Muni, Peter J Kertes, David T Wong
{"title":"抗血管内皮生长因子治疗息肉样脉络膜血管病变:系统综述。","authors":"Andrew Mihalache, Amin Hatamnejad, Nikhil S Patil, Marko M Popovic, Rajeev H Muni, Peter J Kertes, David T Wong","doi":"10.1159/000533529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are no guidelines on the optimal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monotherapy regimen for patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). In this study, we aimed to assess the comparative safety and efficacy of different treatment regimens of anti-VEGF monotherapy for PCV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature search on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library from January 2000 to May 2023 for comparative articles reporting on different treatment regimens of anti-VEGF agents in PCV. Our primary outcomes were the final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the change in BCVA from baseline. Secondary outcomes were the final retinal thickness (RT), the change in RT from baseline, the rate of polyp closure, and the incidence of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10,440 studies were screened, and seven studies reporting on 636 eyes with PCV at baseline were included in this systematic review. One RCT of 53 eyes found a similar final BCVA, change in BCVA from baseline, final RT, and complete polyp closure rate between a treat-and-extend (T&amp;E) regimen and a bimonthly fixed-dosing regimen of aflibercept. This trial also found superiority of T&amp;E for change in RT from baseline. One observational study of 33 eyes found a similar BCVA at last study observation between a pro re nata (PRN) regimen and bimonthly fixed-dosing regimen of aflibercept. One observational study of 42 eyes found a similar change in BCVA from baseline and complete polyp closure rate between a PRN regimen and bimonthly fixed-dosing regimen of aflibercept. One RCT of 249 eyes found a similar change in BCVA and RT from baseline, as well as polyp closure, between a T&amp;E regimen and fixed 12-week dosing regimen of conbercept. One observational study of 30 eyes found a superiority of T&amp;E aflibercept for change in BCVA and risk of polyp recurrence, compared to a PRN regimen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, there is a paucity of evidence comparing various treatment regimens of anti-VEGF therapy in patients with PCV. This limited evidence suggests that current treatment regimens are similarly efficacious, though T&amp;E aflibercept achieved superior outcomes when compared to bimonthly dosing or PRN in some individual studies. Further trials are needed to confirm or refute these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19595,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":"245-254"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy Regimens for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Mihalache, Amin Hatamnejad, Nikhil S Patil, Marko M Popovic, Rajeev H Muni, Peter J Kertes, David T Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000533529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are no guidelines on the optimal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monotherapy regimen for patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). In this study, we aimed to assess the comparative safety and efficacy of different treatment regimens of anti-VEGF monotherapy for PCV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature search on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library from January 2000 to May 2023 for comparative articles reporting on different treatment regimens of anti-VEGF agents in PCV. Our primary outcomes were the final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the change in BCVA from baseline. Secondary outcomes were the final retinal thickness (RT), the change in RT from baseline, the rate of polyp closure, and the incidence of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10,440 studies were screened, and seven studies reporting on 636 eyes with PCV at baseline were included in this systematic review. One RCT of 53 eyes found a similar final BCVA, change in BCVA from baseline, final RT, and complete polyp closure rate between a treat-and-extend (T&amp;E) regimen and a bimonthly fixed-dosing regimen of aflibercept. This trial also found superiority of T&amp;E for change in RT from baseline. One observational study of 33 eyes found a similar BCVA at last study observation between a pro re nata (PRN) regimen and bimonthly fixed-dosing regimen of aflibercept. One observational study of 42 eyes found a similar change in BCVA from baseline and complete polyp closure rate between a PRN regimen and bimonthly fixed-dosing regimen of aflibercept. One RCT of 249 eyes found a similar change in BCVA and RT from baseline, as well as polyp closure, between a T&amp;E regimen and fixed 12-week dosing regimen of conbercept. One observational study of 30 eyes found a superiority of T&amp;E aflibercept for change in BCVA and risk of polyp recurrence, compared to a PRN regimen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, there is a paucity of evidence comparing various treatment regimens of anti-VEGF therapy in patients with PCV. This limited evidence suggests that current treatment regimens are similarly efficacious, though T&amp;E aflibercept achieved superior outcomes when compared to bimonthly dosing or PRN in some individual studies. Further trials are needed to confirm or refute these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"245-254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659003/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533529\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533529","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于息肉样脉络膜血管病变(polypoidal choroidal vascupathy, PCV)患者的最佳抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)单药治疗方案尚无指南。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估不同治疗方案的抗vegf单药治疗PCV的安全性和有效性。方法:从2000年1月至2023年5月,我们在Ovid MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统的文献检索,以比较报道PCV不同治疗方案的抗vegf药物。我们的主要结果是最终最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和BCVA从基线的变化。次要结果是最终视网膜厚度(RT), RT从基线的变化,息肉闭合率和不良事件的发生率。结果:共筛选了10440项研究,其中7项研究报告了636只基线时的PCV。一项包含53只眼睛的随机对照试验发现,在治疗延长(T&E)方案和每两个月固定剂量的阿伯西普方案之间,BCVA的最终值、BCVA从基线的变化、最终RT和息肉完全闭合率相似。该试验还发现T&E在基线RT变化方面的优势。一项对33只眼睛的观察性研究发现,在最后的研究观察中,在PRN方案和每两个月固定给药方案之间发现了类似的BCVA。一项对42只眼睛的观察性研究发现,在PRN方案和每两个月固定给药方案之间,BCVA从基线和息肉完全闭合率的变化相似。一项包含249只眼睛的随机对照试验发现,在T&E方案和固定的12周给药方案之间,BCVA和RT从基线开始也有类似的变化,以及息肉闭合。一项针对30只眼睛的观察性研究发现,与PRN方案相比,T&E afliberept在BCVA改变和息肉复发风险方面具有优势。结论:总体而言,比较PCV患者抗vegf治疗的各种治疗方案的证据不足。这些有限的证据表明,目前的治疗方案同样有效,尽管在一些单独的研究中,与每两个月给药或PRN相比,T&E aflibercept取得了更好的结果。需要进一步的试验来证实或反驳这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy Regimens for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: There are no guidelines on the optimal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monotherapy regimen for patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). In this study, we aimed to assess the comparative safety and efficacy of different treatment regimens of anti-VEGF monotherapy for PCV.

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library from January 2000 to May 2023 for comparative articles reporting on different treatment regimens of anti-VEGF agents in PCV. Our primary outcomes were the final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the change in BCVA from baseline. Secondary outcomes were the final retinal thickness (RT), the change in RT from baseline, the rate of polyp closure, and the incidence of adverse events.

Results: A total of 10,440 studies were screened, and seven studies reporting on 636 eyes with PCV at baseline were included in this systematic review. One RCT of 53 eyes found a similar final BCVA, change in BCVA from baseline, final RT, and complete polyp closure rate between a treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen and a bimonthly fixed-dosing regimen of aflibercept. This trial also found superiority of T&E for change in RT from baseline. One observational study of 33 eyes found a similar BCVA at last study observation between a pro re nata (PRN) regimen and bimonthly fixed-dosing regimen of aflibercept. One observational study of 42 eyes found a similar change in BCVA from baseline and complete polyp closure rate between a PRN regimen and bimonthly fixed-dosing regimen of aflibercept. One RCT of 249 eyes found a similar change in BCVA and RT from baseline, as well as polyp closure, between a T&E regimen and fixed 12-week dosing regimen of conbercept. One observational study of 30 eyes found a superiority of T&E aflibercept for change in BCVA and risk of polyp recurrence, compared to a PRN regimen.

Conclusion: Overall, there is a paucity of evidence comparing various treatment regimens of anti-VEGF therapy in patients with PCV. This limited evidence suggests that current treatment regimens are similarly efficacious, though T&E aflibercept achieved superior outcomes when compared to bimonthly dosing or PRN in some individual studies. Further trials are needed to confirm or refute these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmologica
Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
39
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1899, ''Ophthalmologica'' has become a frequently cited guide to international work in clinical and experimental ophthalmology. It contains a selection of patient-oriented contributions covering the etiology of eye diseases, diagnostic techniques, and advances in medical and surgical treatment. Straightforward, factual reporting provides both interesting and useful reading. In addition to original papers, ''Ophthalmologica'' features regularly timely reviews in an effort to keep the reader well informed and updated. The large international circulation of this journal reflects its importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信