比较干针与穴位干针治疗中风后腕屈肌痉挛疗效的临床试验方案。

IF 0.9 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Najmeh Nazari, Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari, Soofia Naghdi, Pablo Herrero Gallego, Roshanak Honarpisheh
{"title":"比较干针与穴位干针治疗中风后腕屈肌痉挛疗效的临床试验方案。","authors":"Najmeh Nazari,&nbsp;Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari,&nbsp;Soofia Naghdi,&nbsp;Pablo Herrero Gallego,&nbsp;Roshanak Honarpisheh","doi":"10.51507/j.jams.2022.15.4.273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke is the leading cause of disability in adults worldwide, with spasticity after stroke being one of the more common complications. Dry needling (DN) has been demonstrated to decrease spasticity in stroke patients, although its effects on improving function remain unclear. The purpose of this study protocol is to compare the short-term effects of DN versus acupoint DN on wrist flexor spasticity and upper extremity function in patients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind, randomized clinical trial will be conducted to include patients with stroke and upper extremity spasticity and functional disability. Twenty-four patients with stroke will be randomly assigned to either the DN or acupoint DN (DNap) group. These groups will receive three DN sessions during a one-week period of the wrist flexor muscles or at the LI4 & TE5 acupoints, respectively. The primary outcome measure is the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS) of spasticity. The secondary outcomes are the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of motor function (FMA) and the goniometry to assess the active and passive range of motion of the wrist. Data will be collected at baseline, immediately after the end of three sessions DN, and at a one-week follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of this comparative study will help to determine the more effective method for reducing spasticity and improving motor function in patients with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":46854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Clinical Trial Protocol to Compare the Effect of Dry Needling and Acupoint Dry Needling on Wrist Flexor Spasticity after Stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Najmeh Nazari,&nbsp;Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari,&nbsp;Soofia Naghdi,&nbsp;Pablo Herrero Gallego,&nbsp;Roshanak Honarpisheh\",\"doi\":\"10.51507/j.jams.2022.15.4.273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke is the leading cause of disability in adults worldwide, with spasticity after stroke being one of the more common complications. Dry needling (DN) has been demonstrated to decrease spasticity in stroke patients, although its effects on improving function remain unclear. The purpose of this study protocol is to compare the short-term effects of DN versus acupoint DN on wrist flexor spasticity and upper extremity function in patients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind, randomized clinical trial will be conducted to include patients with stroke and upper extremity spasticity and functional disability. Twenty-four patients with stroke will be randomly assigned to either the DN or acupoint DN (DNap) group. These groups will receive three DN sessions during a one-week period of the wrist flexor muscles or at the LI4 & TE5 acupoints, respectively. The primary outcome measure is the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS) of spasticity. The secondary outcomes are the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of motor function (FMA) and the goniometry to assess the active and passive range of motion of the wrist. Data will be collected at baseline, immediately after the end of three sessions DN, and at a one-week follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of this comparative study will help to determine the more effective method for reducing spasticity and improving motor function in patients with stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51507/j.jams.2022.15.4.273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51507/j.jams.2022.15.4.273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:中风是全世界成年人致残的主要原因,中风后痉挛是最常见的并发症之一。干针(DN)已被证明可以减少中风患者的痉挛,尽管其对改善功能的影响尚不清楚。本研究方案的目的是比较DN与穴位DN对脑卒中患者腕屈肌痉挛和上肢功能的短期影响。方法:采用双盲随机临床试验,纳入脑卒中合并上肢痉挛及功能障碍患者。24例脑卒中患者随机分为DN组和穴位DN组(DNap)。这些组将在一周的时间内分别接受三次腕屈肌或LI4和TE5穴位的DN疗程。主要预后指标是痉挛的改良改良Ashworth量表(MMAS)。次要结果是Fugl-Meyer运动功能评估(FMA)和角形测量来评估手腕的主动和被动运动范围。数据将在基线、三个疗程DN结束后立即收集,并在一周的随访中收集。讨论:本比较研究的结果将有助于确定卒中患者减少痉挛和改善运动功能的更有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Clinical Trial Protocol to Compare the Effect of Dry Needling and Acupoint Dry Needling on Wrist Flexor Spasticity after Stroke.

Background: Stroke is the leading cause of disability in adults worldwide, with spasticity after stroke being one of the more common complications. Dry needling (DN) has been demonstrated to decrease spasticity in stroke patients, although its effects on improving function remain unclear. The purpose of this study protocol is to compare the short-term effects of DN versus acupoint DN on wrist flexor spasticity and upper extremity function in patients with stroke.

Methods: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial will be conducted to include patients with stroke and upper extremity spasticity and functional disability. Twenty-four patients with stroke will be randomly assigned to either the DN or acupoint DN (DNap) group. These groups will receive three DN sessions during a one-week period of the wrist flexor muscles or at the LI4 & TE5 acupoints, respectively. The primary outcome measure is the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS) of spasticity. The secondary outcomes are the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of motor function (FMA) and the goniometry to assess the active and passive range of motion of the wrist. Data will be collected at baseline, immediately after the end of three sessions DN, and at a one-week follow-up visit.

Discussion: The results of this comparative study will help to determine the more effective method for reducing spasticity and improving motor function in patients with stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies
Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal featuring high-quality studies related to basic and clinical acupuncture and meridian research. It also includes new paradigm of integrative research, covering East–West and traditional–modern medicine. Manuscripts should fall into one of the categories: topical review, original research paper, brief ... click here for full Aims & Scope The Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal featuring high-quality studies related to basic and clinical acupuncture and meridian research. It also includes new paradigm of integrative research, covering East–West and traditional–modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信