[COVID-19 中的无创呼吸支持和有创通气 :我们的现状如何?]

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Anaesthesist Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-09 DOI:10.1007/s00101-022-01114-x
Ines Schroeder, Michael Irlbeck, Michael Zoller
{"title":"[COVID-19 中的无创呼吸支持和有创通气 :我们的现状如何?]","authors":"Ines Schroeder, Michael Irlbeck, Michael Zoller","doi":"10.1007/s00101-022-01114-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The controversy surrounding ventilation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues. Early in the pandemic it was postulated that the high intensive care unit (ICU) mortality may have been due to too early intubation. As the pandemic progressed recommendations changed and the use of noninvasive respiratory support (NIRS) increased; however, this did not result in a clear reduction in ICU mortality. Furthermore, large studies on optimal ventilation in COVID-19 are lacking. This review article summarizes the pathophysiological basis, the current state of the science and the impact of different treatment modalities on the outcome. Potential factors that could undermine the benefits of noninvasive respiratory support are discussed. The authors attempt to provide guidance in answering the difficult question of when is the right time to intubate?</p>","PeriodicalId":50796,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesist","volume":"71 5","pages":"333-339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8994638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Noninvasive respiratory support and invasive ventilation in COVID‑19 : Where do we stand today?]\",\"authors\":\"Ines Schroeder, Michael Irlbeck, Michael Zoller\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00101-022-01114-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The controversy surrounding ventilation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues. Early in the pandemic it was postulated that the high intensive care unit (ICU) mortality may have been due to too early intubation. As the pandemic progressed recommendations changed and the use of noninvasive respiratory support (NIRS) increased; however, this did not result in a clear reduction in ICU mortality. Furthermore, large studies on optimal ventilation in COVID-19 are lacking. This review article summarizes the pathophysiological basis, the current state of the science and the impact of different treatment modalities on the outcome. Potential factors that could undermine the benefits of noninvasive respiratory support are discussed. The authors attempt to provide guidance in answering the difficult question of when is the right time to intubate?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesist\",\"volume\":\"71 5\",\"pages\":\"333-339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8994638/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-022-01114-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/4/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-022-01114-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

围绕 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)通气的争议仍在继续。大流行初期,有人推测重症监护室(ICU)的高死亡率可能是由于过早插管造成的。随着大流行的发展,相关建议发生了变化,无创呼吸支持(NIRS)的使用有所增加;然而,这并没有明显降低重症监护室的死亡率。此外,还缺乏关于 COVID-19 最佳通气的大型研究。这篇综述文章总结了病理生理学基础、当前的科学现状以及不同治疗模式对结果的影响。文章还讨论了可能影响无创呼吸支持效果的潜在因素。作者试图为回答 "何时插管最合适?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

[Noninvasive respiratory support and invasive ventilation in COVID‑19 : Where do we stand today?]

[Noninvasive respiratory support and invasive ventilation in COVID‑19 : Where do we stand today?]

[Noninvasive respiratory support and invasive ventilation in COVID‑19 : Where do we stand today?]

[Noninvasive respiratory support and invasive ventilation in COVID‑19 : Where do we stand today?]

The controversy surrounding ventilation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues. Early in the pandemic it was postulated that the high intensive care unit (ICU) mortality may have been due to too early intubation. As the pandemic progressed recommendations changed and the use of noninvasive respiratory support (NIRS) increased; however, this did not result in a clear reduction in ICU mortality. Furthermore, large studies on optimal ventilation in COVID-19 are lacking. This review article summarizes the pathophysiological basis, the current state of the science and the impact of different treatment modalities on the outcome. Potential factors that could undermine the benefits of noninvasive respiratory support are discussed. The authors attempt to provide guidance in answering the difficult question of when is the right time to intubate?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesist
Anaesthesist 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Anaesthesist is an internationally recognized journal de­aling with all aspects of anaesthesia and intensive medicine up to pain therapy. Der Anaesthesist addresses all specialists and scientists particularly interested in anaesthesiology and it is neighbouring areas. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics reflecting the multidisciplinary environment including pharmacotherapy, intensive medicine, emergency medicine, regional anaesthetics, pain therapy and medical law. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of relevant clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信