引导者模式:开放式设计课程的新型双学分体验研究。

Scott Thorne, Greg J Strimel, Nathan Mentzer, David Sears
{"title":"引导者模式:开放式设计课程的新型双学分体验研究。","authors":"Scott Thorne,&nbsp;Greg J Strimel,&nbsp;Nathan Mentzer,&nbsp;David Sears","doi":"10.1007/s41979-022-00075-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored the implementation of a novel approach to dual credit referred to as the facilitator model that can be suited for STEM-focused coursework such as courses focused on engineering, design, technology, and innovation. Unlike other models, high school teachers facilitate the implementation of a college course for both high school and college credit in <i>collaboration</i> with a university instructor who evaluates student learning. This novel approach was specifically implemented for an open-ended undergraduate design course within an engineering technology college, similar to many first-year engineering course experiences that emphasize project-based learning, from a large research-intensive public university. For this study, the facilitator model was piloted with five high school teachers as facilitators of an undergraduate design course for dual credit at two innovative, STEM-focused public charter schools. The qualitative research design focused on examining (1) teacher needs while implementing, and perceptions of, the dual credit facilitator model for an undergraduate design course in urban public charter schools and (2) the impact of this model on student learning. This study included the collection and analysis of over 90 h of interviews, focus groups, surveys, and observations. Results provide a promising outlook for the use of the facilitator model when delivering dual credit content that is open ended and within the context of design, technology, and engineering by (1) navigating multiple institutional policies and processes related to dual-credit implementation, (2) providing ongoing support and fostering collaboration between high schools and university, (3) enabling students to earn directly transcripted college credits that count as a required course toward degree completion, and (4) increasing affordability and access to dual credit coursework. These potential advantages over other dual credit models can help address barriers that may limit access to dual credit coursework, specifically for underserved high schools.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41979-022-00075-5.</p>","PeriodicalId":73571,"journal":{"name":"Journal for STEM education research","volume":"5 3","pages":"479-508"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9559547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Facilitator Model: Investigating a Novel Dual Credit Experience for Open-Ended Design Coursework.\",\"authors\":\"Scott Thorne,&nbsp;Greg J Strimel,&nbsp;Nathan Mentzer,&nbsp;David Sears\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41979-022-00075-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study explored the implementation of a novel approach to dual credit referred to as the facilitator model that can be suited for STEM-focused coursework such as courses focused on engineering, design, technology, and innovation. Unlike other models, high school teachers facilitate the implementation of a college course for both high school and college credit in <i>collaboration</i> with a university instructor who evaluates student learning. This novel approach was specifically implemented for an open-ended undergraduate design course within an engineering technology college, similar to many first-year engineering course experiences that emphasize project-based learning, from a large research-intensive public university. For this study, the facilitator model was piloted with five high school teachers as facilitators of an undergraduate design course for dual credit at two innovative, STEM-focused public charter schools. The qualitative research design focused on examining (1) teacher needs while implementing, and perceptions of, the dual credit facilitator model for an undergraduate design course in urban public charter schools and (2) the impact of this model on student learning. This study included the collection and analysis of over 90 h of interviews, focus groups, surveys, and observations. Results provide a promising outlook for the use of the facilitator model when delivering dual credit content that is open ended and within the context of design, technology, and engineering by (1) navigating multiple institutional policies and processes related to dual-credit implementation, (2) providing ongoing support and fostering collaboration between high schools and university, (3) enabling students to earn directly transcripted college credits that count as a required course toward degree completion, and (4) increasing affordability and access to dual credit coursework. These potential advantages over other dual credit models can help address barriers that may limit access to dual credit coursework, specifically for underserved high schools.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41979-022-00075-5.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for STEM education research\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"479-508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9559547/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for STEM education research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-022-00075-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for STEM education research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-022-00075-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探索了一种新的双学分方法的实施,这种方法被称为促进者模型,适用于以stem为重点的课程,如以工程、设计、技术和创新为重点的课程。与其他模式不同,高中教师与评估学生学习的大学讲师合作,促进大学课程的实施,以获得高中和大学学分。这种新颖的方法是专门为工程技术学院的开放式本科设计课程实施的,类似于许多来自大型研究型公立大学的第一年工程课程经验,强调基于项目的学习。在本研究中,在两所创新的、以stem为重点的公立特许学校,五名高中教师作为双学分本科设计课程的辅导员,对引导者模式进行了试点。定性研究设计的重点是考察(1)教师在实施城市公立特许学校本科设计课程时对双学分促进模式的需求和看法,以及(2)该模式对学生学习的影响。这项研究包括收集和分析超过90小时的访谈、焦点小组、调查和观察。研究结果为在设计、技术和工程的背景下,通过(1)引导与双学分实施相关的多种制度政策和流程,(2)提供持续的支持和促进高中和大学之间的合作,在提供开放式双学分内容时使用促进者模式提供了一个有希望的前景。(3)使学生能够直接获得大学学分,作为完成学位的必修课程;(4)增加双学分课程的可负担性和可获得性。与其他双学分模式相比,这些潜在的优势可以帮助解决可能限制获得双学分课程的障碍,特别是对于服务不足的高中。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址:10.1007/s41979-022-00075-5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Facilitator Model: Investigating a Novel Dual Credit Experience for Open-Ended Design Coursework.

The Facilitator Model: Investigating a Novel Dual Credit Experience for Open-Ended Design Coursework.

The Facilitator Model: Investigating a Novel Dual Credit Experience for Open-Ended Design Coursework.

The Facilitator Model: Investigating a Novel Dual Credit Experience for Open-Ended Design Coursework.

This study explored the implementation of a novel approach to dual credit referred to as the facilitator model that can be suited for STEM-focused coursework such as courses focused on engineering, design, technology, and innovation. Unlike other models, high school teachers facilitate the implementation of a college course for both high school and college credit in collaboration with a university instructor who evaluates student learning. This novel approach was specifically implemented for an open-ended undergraduate design course within an engineering technology college, similar to many first-year engineering course experiences that emphasize project-based learning, from a large research-intensive public university. For this study, the facilitator model was piloted with five high school teachers as facilitators of an undergraduate design course for dual credit at two innovative, STEM-focused public charter schools. The qualitative research design focused on examining (1) teacher needs while implementing, and perceptions of, the dual credit facilitator model for an undergraduate design course in urban public charter schools and (2) the impact of this model on student learning. This study included the collection and analysis of over 90 h of interviews, focus groups, surveys, and observations. Results provide a promising outlook for the use of the facilitator model when delivering dual credit content that is open ended and within the context of design, technology, and engineering by (1) navigating multiple institutional policies and processes related to dual-credit implementation, (2) providing ongoing support and fostering collaboration between high schools and university, (3) enabling students to earn directly transcripted college credits that count as a required course toward degree completion, and (4) increasing affordability and access to dual credit coursework. These potential advantages over other dual credit models can help address barriers that may limit access to dual credit coursework, specifically for underserved high schools.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41979-022-00075-5.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信