以患者为中心的牙科之家:以患者为中心的牙科之家:质量衡量、改进和整合框架》。

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
JDR Clinical & Translational Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1177/23800844231190640
J B Herndon, J C Reynolds, P C Damiano
{"title":"以患者为中心的牙科之家:以患者为中心的牙科之家:质量衡量、改进和整合框架》。","authors":"J B Herndon, J C Reynolds, P C Damiano","doi":"10.1177/23800844231190640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study completed the development of a standardized patient-centered dental home (PCDH) framework to align and integrate with the patient-centered medical home. This study identified measure concepts and specific measures and standards to complete the 4-level measurement framework to implement and evaluate a PCDH. This study built on prior model development, which identified the PCDH definition and characteristics and the components nested within those characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An environmental scan identified existing oral health care quality measure concepts, measures, and standards for rating by the project's National Advisory Committee (NAC). A modified Delphi process, adapted from the RAND appropriateness method, was used to obtain structured feedback from the NAC. NAC members rated measure concepts on importance and, subsequently, specific measures and standards on feasibility, validity, and actionability using a 1 to 9 rating scale. Criteria for model inclusion were based on median ratings and rating dispersion. Open-ended comments were elicited to inform model inclusion as well as identify additional concepts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified more than 500 existing oral health care measures and standards. A structured process was used to identify a subset that best aligned with a PCDH for rating by the NAC. Four Delphi rounds were completed, with 2 rounds to rate measure concepts and 2 rounds to rate measures and standards. NAC quantitative ratings and qualitative comments resulted in a total of 61 measure concepts and 47 measures and standards retained for inclusion in the framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NAC ratings of measure concepts, and specific measures and standards nested within those concepts, completed the 4-level PCDH measurement framework. The resulting framework allows for the development and implementation of core measure sets to identify and evaluate a PCDH, facilitating quality improvement and dental-medical integration.</p><p><strong>Knowledge transfer statement: </strong>Clinicians, payers, health care systems, and policy makers can use the results of this study to guide and assess implementation of the various components of a patient-centered dental home and to support dental-medical integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":14783,"journal":{"name":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","volume":" ","pages":"123-139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Patient-Centered Dental Home: A Framework for Quality Measurement, Improvement, and Integration.\",\"authors\":\"J B Herndon, J C Reynolds, P C Damiano\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23800844231190640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study completed the development of a standardized patient-centered dental home (PCDH) framework to align and integrate with the patient-centered medical home. This study identified measure concepts and specific measures and standards to complete the 4-level measurement framework to implement and evaluate a PCDH. This study built on prior model development, which identified the PCDH definition and characteristics and the components nested within those characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An environmental scan identified existing oral health care quality measure concepts, measures, and standards for rating by the project's National Advisory Committee (NAC). A modified Delphi process, adapted from the RAND appropriateness method, was used to obtain structured feedback from the NAC. NAC members rated measure concepts on importance and, subsequently, specific measures and standards on feasibility, validity, and actionability using a 1 to 9 rating scale. Criteria for model inclusion were based on median ratings and rating dispersion. Open-ended comments were elicited to inform model inclusion as well as identify additional concepts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified more than 500 existing oral health care measures and standards. A structured process was used to identify a subset that best aligned with a PCDH for rating by the NAC. Four Delphi rounds were completed, with 2 rounds to rate measure concepts and 2 rounds to rate measures and standards. NAC quantitative ratings and qualitative comments resulted in a total of 61 measure concepts and 47 measures and standards retained for inclusion in the framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NAC ratings of measure concepts, and specific measures and standards nested within those concepts, completed the 4-level PCDH measurement framework. The resulting framework allows for the development and implementation of core measure sets to identify and evaluate a PCDH, facilitating quality improvement and dental-medical integration.</p><p><strong>Knowledge transfer statement: </strong>Clinicians, payers, health care systems, and policy makers can use the results of this study to guide and assess implementation of the various components of a patient-centered dental home and to support dental-medical integration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JDR Clinical & Translational Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"123-139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JDR Clinical & Translational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844231190640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844231190640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:本研究完成了以患者为中心的牙科之家(PCDH)标准化框架的开发,使其与以患者为中心的医疗之家相一致和整合。本研究确定了测量概念和具体的测量方法及标准,以完成实施和评估以患者为中心的医疗之家的四级测量框架。本研究以先前的模型开发为基础,确定了以患者为中心的医疗之家的定义和特征,以及嵌套在这些特征中的组成部分:环境扫描确定了现有的口腔医疗质量测量概念、测量方法和标准,供项目的国家咨询委员会(NAC)评定。根据兰德公司的适当性方法改良的德尔菲流程被用来从国家咨询委员会获得结构化反馈。国家咨询委员会成员根据重要性对措施概念进行评分,随后根据可行性、有效性和可操作性对具体措施和标准进行评分,评分标准为 1 到 9 分。纳入模型的标准基于评分中值和评分离散度。我们还征求了开放式意见,以便为纳入模式提供信息并确定其他概念:结果:我们确定了 500 多个现有的口腔保健措施和标准。我们采用了一种结构化的程序来确定最符合 PCDH 的子集,以便由 NAC 进行评级。我们完成了四轮德尔菲评估,其中两轮评估措施概念,两轮评估措施和标准。通过国家咨询委员会的定量评级和定性评论,共有 61 个措施概念和 47 个措施与标准被保留纳入框架:国家咨询委员会对测量概念以及嵌套在这些概念中的具体测量和标准的评级完成了 4 级 PCDH 测量框架。由此产生的框架允许开发和实施核心测量集,以识别和评估 PCDH,促进质量改进和牙科医疗整合:临床医生、付款人、医疗保健系统和政策制定者可以利用本研究的结果来指导和评估以患者为中心的口腔医疗之家的各个组成部分的实施,并支持口腔医疗整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Patient-Centered Dental Home: A Framework for Quality Measurement, Improvement, and Integration.

Objective: This study completed the development of a standardized patient-centered dental home (PCDH) framework to align and integrate with the patient-centered medical home. This study identified measure concepts and specific measures and standards to complete the 4-level measurement framework to implement and evaluate a PCDH. This study built on prior model development, which identified the PCDH definition and characteristics and the components nested within those characteristics.

Methods: An environmental scan identified existing oral health care quality measure concepts, measures, and standards for rating by the project's National Advisory Committee (NAC). A modified Delphi process, adapted from the RAND appropriateness method, was used to obtain structured feedback from the NAC. NAC members rated measure concepts on importance and, subsequently, specific measures and standards on feasibility, validity, and actionability using a 1 to 9 rating scale. Criteria for model inclusion were based on median ratings and rating dispersion. Open-ended comments were elicited to inform model inclusion as well as identify additional concepts.

Results: We identified more than 500 existing oral health care measures and standards. A structured process was used to identify a subset that best aligned with a PCDH for rating by the NAC. Four Delphi rounds were completed, with 2 rounds to rate measure concepts and 2 rounds to rate measures and standards. NAC quantitative ratings and qualitative comments resulted in a total of 61 measure concepts and 47 measures and standards retained for inclusion in the framework.

Conclusions: The NAC ratings of measure concepts, and specific measures and standards nested within those concepts, completed the 4-level PCDH measurement framework. The resulting framework allows for the development and implementation of core measure sets to identify and evaluate a PCDH, facilitating quality improvement and dental-medical integration.

Knowledge transfer statement: Clinicians, payers, health care systems, and policy makers can use the results of this study to guide and assess implementation of the various components of a patient-centered dental home and to support dental-medical integration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JDR Clinical & Translational Research
JDR Clinical & Translational Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: JDR Clinical & Translational Research seeks to publish the highest quality research articles on clinical and translational research including all of the dental specialties and implantology. Examples include behavioral sciences, cariology, oral & pharyngeal cancer, disease diagnostics, evidence based health care delivery, human genetics, health services research, periodontal diseases, oral medicine, radiology, and pathology. The JDR Clinical & Translational Research expands on its research content by including high-impact health care and global oral health policy statements and systematic reviews of clinical concepts affecting clinical practice. Unique to the JDR Clinical & Translational Research are advances in clinical and translational medicine articles created to focus on research with an immediate potential to affect clinical therapy outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信