定性数据分析的现实主义方法。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nursing Research Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-17 DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000686
Arcellia Farosyah Putri, Colin Chandler, Jennifer Tocher
{"title":"定性数据分析的现实主义方法。","authors":"Arcellia Farosyah Putri,&nbsp;Colin Chandler,&nbsp;Jennifer Tocher","doi":"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A realist approach has gained popularity in evaluation research, particularly in understanding causal explanations of how a program works (or not), the circumstances, and the observed outcomes. In qualitative inquiry, the approach has contributed to better theoretically based explanations regarding causal interactions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to discuss how we conducted a realist-informed data analysis to explore the causal interactions within qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We demonstrated a four-step realist approach of retroductive theorizing in qualitative data analysis using a concrete example from our empirical research rooted in the critical realism philosophical stance. These steps include (a) category identification, (b) elaboration of context-mechanism-outcome configuration, (c) demi-regularities identification, and (d) generative mechanism refinement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The four-step qualitative realist data analysis underpins the causal interactions of important factors and reveals the underlying mechanisms. The steps produce comprehensive causal explanations that can be used by related parties-especially when making complex decisions that may affect wide communities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The core process of realist data analysis is retroductive theorizing. The four-step qualitative realist data analysis facilitates this theorizing by allowing the researcher to identify (a) patterns, (b) fluctuation of patterns, (c) mechanisms from collected data, and (d) to confirm proposed mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":49723,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"481-488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Realist Approach to Qualitative Data Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Arcellia Farosyah Putri,&nbsp;Colin Chandler,&nbsp;Jennifer Tocher\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A realist approach has gained popularity in evaluation research, particularly in understanding causal explanations of how a program works (or not), the circumstances, and the observed outcomes. In qualitative inquiry, the approach has contributed to better theoretically based explanations regarding causal interactions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to discuss how we conducted a realist-informed data analysis to explore the causal interactions within qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We demonstrated a four-step realist approach of retroductive theorizing in qualitative data analysis using a concrete example from our empirical research rooted in the critical realism philosophical stance. These steps include (a) category identification, (b) elaboration of context-mechanism-outcome configuration, (c) demi-regularities identification, and (d) generative mechanism refinement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The four-step qualitative realist data analysis underpins the causal interactions of important factors and reveals the underlying mechanisms. The steps produce comprehensive causal explanations that can be used by related parties-especially when making complex decisions that may affect wide communities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The core process of realist data analysis is retroductive theorizing. The four-step qualitative realist data analysis facilitates this theorizing by allowing the researcher to identify (a) patterns, (b) fluctuation of patterns, (c) mechanisms from collected data, and (d) to confirm proposed mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"481-488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000686\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000686","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:现实主义方法在评估研究中越来越受欢迎,尤其是在理解项目如何运作(或是否运作)、环境和观察到的结果的因果解释方面。在定性研究中,该方法有助于更好地对因果关系进行基于理论的解释。目的:本研究的目的是讨论我们如何进行现实主义的知情数据分析,以探索定性数据中的因果关系。方法:我们通过一个植根于批判现实主义哲学立场的实证研究的具体例子,展示了在定性数据分析中回溯理论的四步现实主义方法。这些步骤包括(a)类别识别,(b)上下文机制结果配置的细化,(c)半规律识别,以及(d)生成机制细化。结果:四步定性现实主义数据分析支持了重要因素的因果相互作用,并揭示了潜在的机制。这些步骤产生了全面的因果解释,可供相关方使用,尤其是在做出可能影响广泛社区的复杂决策时。讨论:现实主义数据分析的核心过程是回溯理论。四步定性现实主义数据分析通过允许研究人员识别(a)模式,(b)模式的波动,(c)收集的数据中的机制,以及(d)确认所提出的机制,促进了这一理论化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Realist Approach to Qualitative Data Analysis.

Background: A realist approach has gained popularity in evaluation research, particularly in understanding causal explanations of how a program works (or not), the circumstances, and the observed outcomes. In qualitative inquiry, the approach has contributed to better theoretically based explanations regarding causal interactions.

Objective: The aim of this study was to discuss how we conducted a realist-informed data analysis to explore the causal interactions within qualitative data.

Methods: We demonstrated a four-step realist approach of retroductive theorizing in qualitative data analysis using a concrete example from our empirical research rooted in the critical realism philosophical stance. These steps include (a) category identification, (b) elaboration of context-mechanism-outcome configuration, (c) demi-regularities identification, and (d) generative mechanism refinement.

Results: The four-step qualitative realist data analysis underpins the causal interactions of important factors and reveals the underlying mechanisms. The steps produce comprehensive causal explanations that can be used by related parties-especially when making complex decisions that may affect wide communities.

Discussion: The core process of realist data analysis is retroductive theorizing. The four-step qualitative realist data analysis facilitates this theorizing by allowing the researcher to identify (a) patterns, (b) fluctuation of patterns, (c) mechanisms from collected data, and (d) to confirm proposed mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Research
Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Research is a peer-reviewed journal celebrating over 60 years as the most sought-after nursing resource; it offers more depth, more detail, and more of what today''s nurses demand. Nursing Research covers key issues, including health promotion, human responses to illness, acute care nursing research, symptom management, cost-effectiveness, vulnerable populations, health services, and community-based nursing studies. Each issue highlights the latest research techniques, quantitative and qualitative studies, and new state-of-the-art methodological strategies, including information not yet found in textbooks. Expert commentaries and briefs are also included. In addition to 6 issues per year, Nursing Research from time to time publishes supplemental content not found anywhere else.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信