由医生领导的有多个医学专业的院内多学科小组会议-范围审查。

Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen, Zandra Nymand Ennis, Vasiliki Panou, Jørgen Hangaard, Per Bruno Jensen, Sofie Lock Johansson, Subagini Nagarajah, Marianne Kjær Poulsen, Mette Juel Rothmann, Karoline Schousboe, Stine Jorstad Bugge, Louise Brügmann Jessen, Ida Ransby Schneider, Ann Dorthe Olsen Zwisler, Kurt Højlund, Per Damkier
{"title":"由医生领导的有多个医学专业的院内多学科小组会议-范围审查。","authors":"Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen,&nbsp;Zandra Nymand Ennis,&nbsp;Vasiliki Panou,&nbsp;Jørgen Hangaard,&nbsp;Per Bruno Jensen,&nbsp;Sofie Lock Johansson,&nbsp;Subagini Nagarajah,&nbsp;Marianne Kjær Poulsen,&nbsp;Mette Juel Rothmann,&nbsp;Karoline Schousboe,&nbsp;Stine Jorstad Bugge,&nbsp;Louise Brügmann Jessen,&nbsp;Ida Ransby Schneider,&nbsp;Ann Dorthe Olsen Zwisler,&nbsp;Kurt Højlund,&nbsp;Per Damkier","doi":"10.1177/26335565221141745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multidisciplinary Team Conferences (MDTs) are complex interventions in the modern healthcare system and they promote a model of coordinated patient care and management. However, MDTs within chronic diseases are poorly defined. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review was to summarise the current literature on physician-led in-hospital MDTs in chronic non-malignant diseases.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Following the PRISMA-ScR guideline for scoping reviews, a search on MDT interventions in adult patients, with three or more medical specialties represented, was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 2790 studies, from which 8 studies were included. The majority of studies were non-randomised and focused on a single disease entity such as infective endocarditis, atrial fibrillation, IgG4-related disease, or arterial and venous thrombosis. The main reason for referral was confirmation or establishment of a diagnosis, and the MDT members were primarily from medical specialties gathered especially for the MDT. Outcomes of the included studies were grouped into process indicators and outcome indicators. Process indicators included changes in diagnostic confirmation as well as therapeutic strategy and management. All studies reporting process indicators demonstrated significant changes before and after the MDT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MDTs within chronic diseases appeared highly heterogeneous with respect to structure, reasons for referral, and choice of outcomes. While process indicators, such as change in diagnosis, and treatment management/plan seem improved, such have not been demonstrated through outcome indicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":73843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","volume":"12 ","pages":"26335565221141745"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f3/9f/10.1177_26335565221141745.PMC9742578.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physician-led in-hospital multidisciplinary team conferences with multiple medical specialities present - A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen,&nbsp;Zandra Nymand Ennis,&nbsp;Vasiliki Panou,&nbsp;Jørgen Hangaard,&nbsp;Per Bruno Jensen,&nbsp;Sofie Lock Johansson,&nbsp;Subagini Nagarajah,&nbsp;Marianne Kjær Poulsen,&nbsp;Mette Juel Rothmann,&nbsp;Karoline Schousboe,&nbsp;Stine Jorstad Bugge,&nbsp;Louise Brügmann Jessen,&nbsp;Ida Ransby Schneider,&nbsp;Ann Dorthe Olsen Zwisler,&nbsp;Kurt Højlund,&nbsp;Per Damkier\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26335565221141745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multidisciplinary Team Conferences (MDTs) are complex interventions in the modern healthcare system and they promote a model of coordinated patient care and management. However, MDTs within chronic diseases are poorly defined. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review was to summarise the current literature on physician-led in-hospital MDTs in chronic non-malignant diseases.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Following the PRISMA-ScR guideline for scoping reviews, a search on MDT interventions in adult patients, with three or more medical specialties represented, was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 2790 studies, from which 8 studies were included. The majority of studies were non-randomised and focused on a single disease entity such as infective endocarditis, atrial fibrillation, IgG4-related disease, or arterial and venous thrombosis. The main reason for referral was confirmation or establishment of a diagnosis, and the MDT members were primarily from medical specialties gathered especially for the MDT. Outcomes of the included studies were grouped into process indicators and outcome indicators. Process indicators included changes in diagnostic confirmation as well as therapeutic strategy and management. All studies reporting process indicators demonstrated significant changes before and after the MDT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MDTs within chronic diseases appeared highly heterogeneous with respect to structure, reasons for referral, and choice of outcomes. While process indicators, such as change in diagnosis, and treatment management/plan seem improved, such have not been demonstrated through outcome indicators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"26335565221141745\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f3/9f/10.1177_26335565221141745.PMC9742578.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565221141745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565221141745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

简介:多学科团队会议(MDTs)是现代医疗保健系统中的复杂干预措施,它们促进了协调患者护理和管理的模式。然而,慢性疾病的mdt定义不清。因此,本综述的目的是总结目前关于慢性非恶性疾病中由医生主导的住院mdt的文献。方法:根据PRISMA-ScR指南进行范围审查,对有三个或更多医学专业代表的成年患者进行MDT干预的搜索。结果:我们纳入了2790项研究,其中8项研究被纳入。大多数研究是非随机的,集中于单一疾病实体,如感染性心内膜炎、心房颤动、igg4相关疾病或动脉和静脉血栓形成。转诊的主要原因是确认或确定诊断,联合治疗小组成员主要来自专门为联合治疗小组聚集的医学专家。纳入研究的结果分为过程指标和结果指标。过程指标包括诊断确认以及治疗策略和管理的变化。所有报告过程指标的研究都显示了MDT前后的显著变化。结论:慢性疾病的MDTs在结构、转诊原因和结局选择方面表现出高度异质性。虽然过程指标,如诊断的改变和治疗管理/计划似乎有所改善,但这并没有通过结果指标来证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Physician-led in-hospital multidisciplinary team conferences with multiple medical specialities present - A scoping review.

Physician-led in-hospital multidisciplinary team conferences with multiple medical specialities present - A scoping review.

Physician-led in-hospital multidisciplinary team conferences with multiple medical specialities present - A scoping review.

Introduction: Multidisciplinary Team Conferences (MDTs) are complex interventions in the modern healthcare system and they promote a model of coordinated patient care and management. However, MDTs within chronic diseases are poorly defined. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review was to summarise the current literature on physician-led in-hospital MDTs in chronic non-malignant diseases.

Method: Following the PRISMA-ScR guideline for scoping reviews, a search on MDT interventions in adult patients, with three or more medical specialties represented, was performed.

Results: We identified 2790 studies, from which 8 studies were included. The majority of studies were non-randomised and focused on a single disease entity such as infective endocarditis, atrial fibrillation, IgG4-related disease, or arterial and venous thrombosis. The main reason for referral was confirmation or establishment of a diagnosis, and the MDT members were primarily from medical specialties gathered especially for the MDT. Outcomes of the included studies were grouped into process indicators and outcome indicators. Process indicators included changes in diagnostic confirmation as well as therapeutic strategy and management. All studies reporting process indicators demonstrated significant changes before and after the MDT.

Conclusion: MDTs within chronic diseases appeared highly heterogeneous with respect to structure, reasons for referral, and choice of outcomes. While process indicators, such as change in diagnosis, and treatment management/plan seem improved, such have not been demonstrated through outcome indicators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信