预防“新”痴呆症的新兴技术:加拿大背景下的模糊乐观主义。

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Medical Anthropology Pub Date : 2023-10-03 Epub Date: 2023-08-08 DOI:10.1080/01459740.2023.2244649
Annette Leibing, Cynthia Lazzaroni, Niklas Petersen
{"title":"预防“新”痴呆症的新兴技术:加拿大背景下的模糊乐观主义。","authors":"Annette Leibing,&nbsp;Cynthia Lazzaroni,&nbsp;Niklas Petersen","doi":"10.1080/01459740.2023.2244649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Experts' views on the use of mostly digital technologies for dementia prevention are characterized by a simultaneity of \"gerontechnological optimism\" and skeptical hesitancy. Despite the hope for progress in dementia prevention through preventive technologies, experts also point to the complexity of prevention, the importance of environmental factors and public health policies, and the danger of an excessive focus on individual interventions. Without questioning the positive impact such technologies can have on many people, we claim that the experts' ambiguity reveals a deeper concern, a kind of \"cruel optimism\" that is based on a fantasy of \"supported autonomy\".</p>","PeriodicalId":47460,"journal":{"name":"Medical Anthropology","volume":" ","pages":"607-622"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emerging Technologies for Preventing the 'New' Dementia: Ambiguous Optimism in the Canadian Context.\",\"authors\":\"Annette Leibing,&nbsp;Cynthia Lazzaroni,&nbsp;Niklas Petersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01459740.2023.2244649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Experts' views on the use of mostly digital technologies for dementia prevention are characterized by a simultaneity of \\\"gerontechnological optimism\\\" and skeptical hesitancy. Despite the hope for progress in dementia prevention through preventive technologies, experts also point to the complexity of prevention, the importance of environmental factors and public health policies, and the danger of an excessive focus on individual interventions. Without questioning the positive impact such technologies can have on many people, we claim that the experts' ambiguity reveals a deeper concern, a kind of \\\"cruel optimism\\\" that is based on a fantasy of \\\"supported autonomy\\\".</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Anthropology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"607-622\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2023.2244649\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2023.2244649","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

专家们对主要使用数字技术预防痴呆症的看法同时具有“老年技术乐观主义”和怀疑犹豫的特点。尽管人们希望通过预防技术在预防痴呆症方面取得进展,但专家们也指出了预防的复杂性、环境因素和公共卫生政策的重要性,以及过度关注个人干预的危险。在不质疑这些技术对许多人的积极影响的情况下,我们声称专家们的模棱两可揭示了一种更深层次的担忧,一种基于“支持自主”幻想的“残酷乐观主义”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emerging Technologies for Preventing the 'New' Dementia: Ambiguous Optimism in the Canadian Context.

Experts' views on the use of mostly digital technologies for dementia prevention are characterized by a simultaneity of "gerontechnological optimism" and skeptical hesitancy. Despite the hope for progress in dementia prevention through preventive technologies, experts also point to the complexity of prevention, the importance of environmental factors and public health policies, and the danger of an excessive focus on individual interventions. Without questioning the positive impact such technologies can have on many people, we claim that the experts' ambiguity reveals a deeper concern, a kind of "cruel optimism" that is based on a fantasy of "supported autonomy".

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Medical Anthropology provides a global forum for scholarly articles on the social patterns of ill-health and disease transmission, and experiences of and knowledge about health, illness and wellbeing. These include the nature, organization and movement of peoples, technologies and treatments, and how inequalities pattern access to these. Articles published in the journal showcase the theoretical sophistication, methodological soundness and ethnographic richness of contemporary medical anthropology. Through the publication of empirical articles and editorials, we encourage our authors and readers to engage critically with the key debates of our time. Medical Anthropology invites manuscripts on a wide range of topics, reflecting the diversity and the expanding interests and concerns of researchers in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信